Cops's Gun vs Taser Shock

Pinky

Pinky

New Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
5,888
Reaction score
0
I just thought to make a thread. I want to know about Gun and Taser shock between. It's American's choice to use a gun or taser shock. Gun can cause die. I heard taser shock can cause die too. is that right? You can discuss about Gun and Taser Shock between here.
 
Less likely to die from a tazer shock. I would hope guns would be the absolute last resort of police officers.
 
It's better to freeze them without harm warm-blood. then it would rocks and safe.
 
Okay... :hmm: Tell us about your opinions. Which is the best safe for gun or taser shock for suspects people?
 
I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser. :roll:
 
I highly highly highly support the use of Taser as the frontline defense weapon. The gun is always always the last resort because it is a deadly force and people will die.
 
VamPyroX said:
I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser. :roll:
Click to expand...

**nodding agreement** It would appear that as they are less deadly, the officers are much quicker to use them, and are using them excessively. That is real reason for concern.
 
jillio said:
**nodding agreement** It would appear that as they are less deadly, the officers are much quicker to use them, and are using them excessively. That is real reason for concern.
Click to expand...
I guess the cops are getting lazy and think that using the taser is the solution to everything. :roll:
 
Either.....but remember, taser shock has a very, very limited range. I rather the cops to have the pepperbag guns than taser shock. More range than taser shock, of course.

But I'd say, let the cops to have it both. They will need the gun, they'll never know if a suspect is armed or not.
 
Texan Guy said:
Either.....but remember, taser shock has a very, very limited range. I rather the cops to have the pepperbag guns than taser shock. More range than taser shock, of course.

But I'd say, let the cops to have it both. They will need the gun, they'll never know if a suspect is armed or not.
Click to expand...
but then... they could die of asthma attack or allergy...
 
Why should the majority be weighed down by a bunch of crippled or defective people, anyway? They shouldn't be trying to getting into trouble anyway!
 
Wokamuka said:
Why should the majority be weighed down by a bunch of crippled or defective people, anyway? They shouldn't be trying to getting into trouble anyway!
Click to expand...

:gpost: same for responsive legal gun owners for protection purpose!
 
Is it sense to taser, shot or beat up unarmed pregnant women, senior people, children, teenagers and speed drivers accord videos in other threads because they ignored Police Officer´s order or try to say or ask them something? To me, no but unprofessional for use weapons to abuse unarmed people like that...
 
VamPyroX said:
I'm not really worried about using tasers instead of guns, but my bigger worry is the fact that more and more police officers are using tasers more often for things that they could have done without using a taser. :roll:
Click to expand...

That worries me as well. I guess I'm already inclined to be afraid and distrusting of police officers in general, and maybe that affects how I feel, but it does scare me that it seems that "police brutality" seems to be on the rise.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
Yes but I would like to add to your post is their paraniod problem.
Click to expand...
Think of it this way...

They can waste 5 minutes wrestling with a guy in order to arrest him.

OR

They can just shoot a taser for 30 seconds. That gives them 4 and a half minutes of free time to stop by the local Krispy Kreme for some donuts. ;)
 
Back
Top