Computerized Medical Files

Vance

New Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
4,265
Reaction score
1
BOSTON -- Doctors in Massachusetts would be able to access patients' records from any hospital or clinic in the state by computer under an initiative announced Monday.

The "eHealth" project will begin as a pilot program in three communities yet to be selected, with a goal of having a statewide system in place within five years. The insurance company Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts is providing $50 million in funding toward the project.

Gov. Mitt Romney said switching from paper records to easily shared electronic records could save the state millions of dollars while improving patient safety and quality of care.

Project leader Micky Tripathi said medicine is one of the few business sectors yet to embrace electronic information technology, mainly for a lack of financial incentive and the difficulty of making computer systems compatible.

Tripathi said Massachusetts could become the first state in the nation to have a statewide electronic medical record system. He said Indiana has launched a similar pilot program, but Tripathi said it doesn't have the funding or the industry support that exists in Massachusetts.

Tripathi said hospitals and doctors have had no financial incentive to invest in an electronic record-keeping system that primarily benefits insurance companies by keeping costs down. Now that an insurance company is making an investment, that concern could be allayed, he said.

Romney said the system would have strict controls to allow patients to control who sees their records.

The Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group, a consumer advocacy organization, said patients should have individual personal identification numbers by which they would control access to their records.

Source: http://www.boston.com/business/tech.../06/mass_launches_computerized_medical_files/


IMHO, it is too risk to have "ehealth" files. As long as it is digital, it is hackable and changeable. More reason why I better off to stay healthy by consuming the intelligent diet. Less computerized, more privacy.
 
i agree Magatsu -- i was thinking :wtf: and i sure as hell would not have supported that sort of project -- in today's age and time like u said, computer programs and etc CAN be hackable

i know for sure i would want my doctor visits to be private!
 
Fly Free said:
i know for sure i would want my doctor visits to be private!
I agree with you. I don't want anyone but my doctor to know about my conditions. Imagine the age of digital where the insurance companies can access your medical files and make a choice whether to support you or not. That's what will happen in the future. 40% of Americans are taking the drugs, that is something to consider about. Ack.
 
Misconception: Because it's Digital, it's hackable.

That's not quite true, just because something is digital, doesn't mean it's hackable. But when you place the computer so it can be accessed by the general public, then it becomes hackable if safeguards aren't taken.

There are lots of secure systems if the administrators know what they are doing, and stay on top of things. Hopefully this will be the case here.

Your paper records are almost as hackable as they are handled by so many people I'm sure there are oppurtunities to sneak a peak at your records or even change them by a corrupt employee.

As one who has had to shuttle my own records or have them sent FedEx overnight. A digital system sounds intriguing.
 
PeterEMT, I respectfully disagree with you. Well, what I learned from computer & programming courses. From what I understand is that digital will be always hackable regardless of security they installed. Yes papers can be hackable too but it will not be spread like a fire in the dryland as digital 'ehealth' files do when hacked. There is factors in 'ehealth' files, good example: insurance as I explained above.

As a doctor-student, I don't see any benefits in 'ehealth' files, not even one. It is called 'trust' between doctor and patient.
 
Back
Top