CIA Report

[Foxrac]

That's probably true. We all know that it was him and his cocky Dick the VP.

Oh whoa, you have very poor judgment on both of them.

Both of Bush and Cheney aren't only two of them who are responsible, there's many people are responsible for that, such as CIA and both of Bush and Obama admin.

 

[webexplorer]

Oh whoa, you have very poor judgment on both of them.

Both of Bush and Cheney aren't only two of them who are responsible, there's many people are responsible for that, such as CIA and both of Bush and Obama admin.

You said to add politicians... I haven't made a poor judgment. Whoa, Bush and Cheney were the bosses that told them do and don't. You could be right that Obama admin that I haven't thought. Whoa, my horse is running too fast.

 

[SoS]

Again. Read a law book. Study some social psych of justice. I'm not telling you to read a law book so you will adopt my point of view. I am telling you that you need to inform yourself of the implications before you make a definitive statement. I have pointed you to the source. It isn't my job to spoon feed it to you. It is up to you to educate yourself.....or not.

It got nothing to do with that, it got to do with the fact that you are running away from my direct question. Why you are doing this? :roll:

If you were writing a paper about Bush & Company broke some serious laws in an argument writing class, would u tell your teacher to go read a law book? HELL NO! I know you will backup it very well.

My conclusion is that you are too lazy to backup your allegations in fear someone will rip up your points.

TRY AGAIN!

 

[Beowulf]

I do not believe so, but you can certainly state so Byrdie.


Good question, and the answer is..No, it wasn't illegal.

Bush did not lie.
There certainly were WMD's.
To prosecute 'Bush and his companions' would include Democrats including possibly Obama.
and lastly, Only speaking for myself. I do not care what skewed ideas other countries have about Bush, Obama, or America(ns). I would love it if Germany, for example, were to kick out their leader and place Obama there. I think the blinded love fest would quickly wear off.

rly:

 

[jillio]

It got nothing to do with that, it got to do with the fact that you are running away from my direct question. Why you are doing this? :roll:

If you were writing a paper about Bush & Company broke some serious laws in an argument writing class, would u tell your teacher to go read a law book? HELL NO! I know you will backup it very well.

My conclusion is that you are too lazy to backup your allegations in fear someone will rip up your points.

TRY AGAIN!

Big difference...you are not a teacher. I am. And I am telling the student what he/she needs to do to learn.

 

[SoS]

Big difference...you are not a teacher. I am. And I am telling the student what he/she needs to do to learn.

See, there u go again, running away from the question.

Try Again.

 

[Byrdie714]

I do not believe so, but you can certainly state so Byrdie.


Good question, and the answer is..No, it wasn't illegal.

Bush did not lie.
There certainly were WMD's.
To prosecute 'Bush and his companions' would include Democrats including possibly Obama.
and lastly, Only speaking for myself. I do not care what skewed ideas other countries have about Bush, Obama, or America(ns). I would love it if Germany, for example, were to kick out their leader and place Obama there. I think the blinded love fest would quickly wear off.

The WMD's were provided to the Iraq's by the Americans. Afterall it was a WMD made in the USA that killed off the Kurds.......

Bush needs to be prosecuted. Period.

 

[jillio]

See, there u go again, running away from the question.

Try Again.

Not running away from the question at all. Simply telling you how to answer it for yourself. You must be used to someone doing everything for you.

 

[Jiro]

You said to add politicians... I haven't made a poor judgment. Whoa, Bush and Cheney were the bosses that told them do and don't. You could be right that Obama admin that I haven't thought. Whoa, my horse is running too fast.

yes. Last time I checked - this country has check and balance system. People (both Republicans and Democrats) enabled Bush & Cheney to authorize such thing. Like I said again.... and again..... and again..... if you're going to prosecute Bush & Cheney - that means you will find at least hundred of people responsible (most likely a handful of them are currently in Obama Administration). The blood is on their hands.....

so ladies & gentlemen.... prosecution? good luck

 

[Jiro]

Again. Read a law book. Study some social psych of justice. I'm not telling you to read a law book so you will adopt my point of view. I am telling you that you need to inform yourself of the implications before you make a definitive statement. I have pointed you to the source. It isn't my job to spoon feed it to you. It is up to you to educate yourself.....or not.

work with us, not against us. help us understand your POV.... along with source.

 

[jillio]

work with us, not against us. help us understand your POV.... along with source.

Matter of perspective. I don't see that getting people to do their own research, and thus become independent learners, is working against them. I see it as them developing valuable skills that can be used for the rest of their lives to continue learning.

 

[jillio]

yes. Last time I checked - this country has check and balance system. People (both Republicans and Democrats) enabled Bush & Cheney to authorize such thing. Like I said again.... and again..... and again..... if you're going to prosecute Bush & Cheney - that means you will find at least hundred of people responsible (most likely a handful of them are currently in Obama Administration). The blood is on their hands.....

so ladies & gentlemen.... prosecution? good luck

The blood is on their hands? Interesting turn of phrase, there. That is usually a phrase used when guilt is evident.

 

[SoS]

Not running away from the question at all. Simply telling you how to answer it for yourself. You must be used to someone doing everything for you.

You see, you are trying to avoid the question and take alot of low cheap shot at me. I can read between the line more than u realize.

I will say this, when you argue a point, you need to back it up. That's the art of debating. Another conclusion that you are giving out that you hate Bush so bad that you will say anything against him without backing it up. Very similar to the behavior of some of the liberals during Nixon's time.

I read alot of your posts (you got a long history) and one thing that come to mind, you don't like it when people go around your questions, but at same time you are doing it yourself.

If the shoe fits, wear it.

 

[jillio]

You see, you are trying to avoid the question and take alot of low cheap shot at me. I can read between the line more than u realize.

I will say this, when you argue a point, you need to back it up. That's the art of debating. Another conclusion that you are giving out that you hate Bush so bad that you will say anything against him without backing it up. Very similar to the behavior of some of the liberals during Nixon's time.

I read alot of your posts (you got a long history) and one thing that come to mind, you don't like it when people go around your questions, but same time you are doing it yourself.

If the shoe fits, wear it.

I'm not avoiding the question at all. In fact, I have answered it twice. Nor am I taking a cheap shot at you. I am simply assuming that you are capable of learning. Perhaps I was wrong?

What's to like about Bush? For that matter, what was to like about Nixon? But it is interesting that you would link the two. I see many similarities, as well. Both have been an embarrassment. I have lived through both presidencies, and am far more familiar with the political climate during both than you seem to think I am.

What shoe might that be?

 

[ASLGAL]

The WMD's were provided to the Iraq's by the Americans. Afterall it was a WMD made in the USA that killed off the Kurds.......

Bush needs to be prosecuted. Period.

Since that was not under President Bush's watch then I assume you want Clinton prosecuted?

 

[Byrdie714]

Since that was not under President Bush's watch then I assume you want Clinton prosecuted?

Actually it was under Bush I administration.

 

[Reba]

I can't believe you actually asked that.

Is that your answer to my question?

 

[jillio]

Is that your answer to my question?

Yep.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

Bush did not lie.
There certainly were WMD's.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-10-06-wmd_x.htm

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq - Conflict in Iraq- msnbc.com

Inspector says Iraq had no WMD - Conflict in Iraq- msnbc.com

It shows itself that Bush lied and started a war. This is a fact that he is responsible for the hundred thousands deaths of innocent people. Yes I know that Bush is not alone but his people including Blair as well.

To prosecute 'Bush and his companions' would include Democrats including possibly Obama.

Obama? How? I do not see anything that he authoritied the form of torture but inherited Bush´s BIG mess.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

Oh whoa, you have very poor judgment on both of them.

Both of Bush and Cheney aren't only two of them who are responsible, there's many people are responsible for that, such as CIA and both of Bush and Obama admin.

Actually, Bush and his people are responsible for this, not just Bush but Obama admin? How? It´s him who said last January that he know the form of torture, Bush & his people authority is wrong and have all form of torture banned under his admin.

Could you please provide the link to support your claim that Obama is also responsible, too.