Captionists help deaf students keep up in class

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,160
Reaction score
7
Captionists help deaf students keep up in class - College Heights Herald: News

Cortney Scott is an agriculture education major and is ahead of schedule on academic hours.

She is also considered half deaf.

Scott, Clarksville senior who is in her thrid year at WKU, is gradually losing hearing in both of her ears.

“They think I was born with it, but they’re not sure,” said Scott, who uses aids for both ears.

Scott is one of seven students at WKU who uses the captioning system provided by the Deaf & Hard of Hearing Services, coordinator Sarah Gibbs said.

The system, run by a program called C-Print, allows students to read everything spoken in the classroom as it is typed by a hired individual called a captionist.

“We type everything that’s said in class,” Gibbs said.

This includes comments and jokes made by students, she said.

After class, the captionist saves the content, edits for grammar or other mistakes and e-mails the transcript to the student.

“It’s a real-time accommodation,” Gibbs said.

Captionists use a variety of abbreviations and shorthand, aiming to record “concept for concept, not necessarily word for word,” she said.

Gibbs said without the system, students would be struggling to understand the content of the lecture or discussion.

“The student would be trying to lipread or trying to catch what the (professors) said,” Gibbs said. “This helps them get all the information they need to be successful in the classroom.”

WKU has the largest captioning program in the state, Gibbs said.

“Our Deaf & Hard of Hearing Services may not be the largest, but our C-Print is,” she said.

The program is also used on other media, such as Youtube clips and short videos.

“We try and get them beforehand so that we can caption them and the student has the transcript to read during class,” Gibbs said.

She also said C-Print can be used for services outside of the classroom, such as guest speakers and “anything that the university sponsors.”

Scott said that in high school, she used the 504 Plan, which ensures students will not be segregated or discriminated in the classroom, according to Section 504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

However, Scott said the 504 Plan does not legally require the school to provide accommodation services.

“In high school, I had to do a lot of fending for myself and advocating for myself,” she said.

When Scott toured WKU, she met with Student Disabilities Services and learned about what they offer.

“That was the determining decision,” she said. “I knew I wanted to be here. It felt like home.”

Scott uses the captioning to supplement her note-taking.

“If I miss something or misunderstand something, I can go back,” she said. “It helps me have a better overall understanding.”

Karen Porter, who works full time with the captioning system, is one of Scott’s four captionists.

Porter, a WKU alumna and captionist for three years, applied for the position after seeing an ad in the newspaper.

“I’m retired, and I was looking for something that I thought would be personally rewarding,” Porter said.

Porter captions for three different students this semester but said it varies depending on students’ schedules.

“Our goal is really to blend in the classroom,” she said. “Captioning is really to help our students have the same experience that any other student would have.

“We’re trying to level the playing field for our students as much as possible.”

Porter said she is with the students in class, regardless of the circumstances.

She said her strangest experience was providing captions during an animal science class.

“One day, they were dissecting the stomach of a cow,” she said.

Porter also sees her job as a challenge.

“I can kind of personally motivate myself,” she said.

Porter said she enjoys knowing her position is impacting her students.

“I feel like I am providing a service to students that will have a difference in their lives,” she said. “I just have the best of all worlds.”
 
I'm wondering if there's some type of a speech to text service that does not involve a 3rd live person?
 
I'm wondering if there's some type of a speech to text service that does not involve a 3rd live person?

I would LOVE that. The technology already exists, but it's not accurate most of the time, especially when you don't train the software with the speaker's voice. And if you use it in meetings? FUHGETABOUTIT!
 
I would LOVE that. The technology already exists, but it's not accurate most of the time, especially when you don't train the software with the speaker's voice. And if you use it in meetings? FUHGETABOUTIT!
I could follow the speaker pretty good in a small setting. However, I could use something like this within a large setting or when I do not have a good view of the speaker, including those that could be speaking from the audience.

I also figured that this technology could come in handy that if there were to be a seminar or event I might be interested to go to. And that rather than checking with "one sponsor or one event or one company or one organization at a time..." if they'll provide the accommodations, I'll just take care of my end and "go!".
 
I could follow the speaker pretty good in a small setting. However, I could use something like this within a large setting or when I do not have a good view of the speaker, including those that could be speaking from the audience.

Ditto. I wouldn't need this technology for a small setting. However, sometimes I go to meetings with 10 or more people. Also, some of the meetings are done via telecon/webcon. There is no way I can understand someone without lipreading. However, there IS some capability to have a transcriber to listen in the telecon/webcon and type out everything for you.

But... there is 1 problem. It's a security issue if the material is sensitive.
 
I could follow the speaker pretty good in a small setting. However, I could use something like this within a large setting or when I do not have a good view of the speaker, including those that could be speaking from the audience.

I also figured that this technology could come in handy that if there were to be a seminar or event I might be interested to go to. And that rather than checking with "one sponsor or one event or one company or one organization at a time..." if they'll provide the accommodations, I'll just take care of my end and "go!".

Blah, I would love that too!!!!

I use CART for my college classes, which was bit of a challenge for my typists because of the volume of the materials and lots of new terminologies, especially for math and science classes I took. But I pretty much like CART.
 
Blah, I would love that too!!!!

I use CART for my college classes, which was bit of a challenge for my typists because of the volume of the materials and lots of new terminologies, especially for math and science classes I took. But I pretty much like CART.
Yes, I like using CART too. It's a good "backup" tool. So you can look at the screen if needed if you do not have a good view of the speaker, etc.

However, having an automated speech to text translator without involving a live 3rd person would be taking it to the next level. For instance, if you could just take your laptop with you and use it there. That would be cool!
 
However, Scott said the 504 Plan does not legally require the school to provide accommodation services.

That surprised me. Won't that be part of having a deaf student attend classroom??
 
What's the difference C-Print and Cart?

Thanks!

I've had both services. CART is better but depending on your location, CART service may not be available so C-Print is an alternative solution. and cost-effective too because CART service is expensive.

while CART service is done with a stenographer (aka court reporter) with a special machine connected to laptop for your viewing... C-PRINT is done with a regular laptop with special program to catch up to a speed of CART as close as possible.

I would say that CART captures probably 95-98% of 1-hr lecture and C-Print captures probably 85-90%.
 

I had my professors in collage use one of the old Betas for this (type of program) by setting up a one hour appointment with them and having them teach the program.

It did well.

I had seven virtual machines set up on my computer because the program I was using (vaporware now actually they were bought by AT&T or something) only allowed one speech profile.

I audio taped every lecture and then played the audio back to the computer - then I could watch the lecture in real time and not worry about notes, and have all the lecture verbatim (mostly) later.

I went to JU, they were awesome.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top