Suggest one reread post #1- opinions etc re D. who is deaf/Deaf.
As I noted in #7- does one treat DEAF as a condition or "cultural configuration"? Also note: if a hearing person uses ASL accepts that the Deaf has/is being "oppressed" than the label Deaf can be utilized.
Only in ideology/Sociology can this "discussion" seem to "some" "reasonable."
Again Sociology can be interesting at times.
I think I see one area you are confused and mistaken. "Deaf" with a capital D is NOT a synonym for " Oppressed" it is a Cultural identification just like saying you are Canadian or Italian or Black, Hispanic, Chinese etc. sure most minorities experience oppression of one sort of another. those experiences over time by a group contribute characteristics to the cultural identity of that group but it is just one of many shared experiences that creates the identity.
As soon as you think of the word "D"eaf it seems you think of Oppression due to hearing loss a person has and that the person or group exists to rebel or resist the oppression this is completely off base. oppression in Deaf Culture is just a topic like any politics, sports, religion etc that we discuss and will try to infulence changes in the country, majority culture that will be beneficial to us. Just and any business, religion, cultural or political group will do.
Deaf makes me think of ASL and all sign languages that have provided a natural language to deaf persons so they can have a 100% unhindered language to communicate in. Thus the language has bought us together, educated us, created our community, etc. Think of China town or Korea town etc. folks with a common language and culture come together so they can live and interact in an uninhibited community that understands then and their customs, history, interests, experiences etc...
THIS IS WHAT Deaf MEANS.... Maybe DEAF as you yell it, means how you have suffered or been oppressed due to hearing loss, but it does not apply to how we , Deafies use the word or how we intend for it to be defined or understood
PS, Please stop quoting the same 32 year old text book that is totally irrelevant in every other thread you contribute to . the number of pages has nothing to do with the validity of a book. Have you actually read any Deaf History books at all or modern works on Deaf Culture and ASL???? I can quote dozens of books that Identify Deaf Culture that your book missed. Did you book happen to address LGBT culture, Generation X, Y, etc? just because every possible group is not listed in one outdated sociology book, does not mean they don't exist... Most likely your author had never been exposed to Deaf Culture as 32 years ago it was kept quiet from hearing folks... If the author was/ is still alive and was presented with modern academia on why Deaf is a culture I am pretty sure he would agree it is and add it if it were relevant to an updated edition of his text.
Edit: I do have trouble understanding some of Bill's comments do to strange punctuation, fragments and statements that seem to not make any coherent thought. basically every post he made from #50 onward. Maybe I need a DEAF to written English Interperter to translate the DrPhilisms