Archaeologists find 'gay caveman'

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,160
Reaction score
7
Archaeologists find 'gay caveman'

It has taken five thousand years, but it appears a caveman has finally been able to come clean on his sexual orientation.

According to archaeologists, the way the "gay caveman" was buried suggests he was considered more effeminate than other male peers, the Daily Mail reports.

The skeleton of the early homo-sapien was recently unearthed during excavations in the Czech Republic, and is believed to date back to between 2900 and 2500 BC.

Experts say during that period, men were traditionally buried lying on their right side, with the head pointing towards the west, alongside weapons, hammers and flint knives.

In this case, the man was on his left side, his head facing west, and surrounded with household jugs, not weapons — usually symbolism reserved for women.

The team carrying out the dig said because of the layout of the grave, it was likely to indicate the person was a transvestite or "third gender", which is sometimes associated in Western Culture with being gay.

The late Stone Age man was also buried with an oval, egg-shaped container, usually associated with female burials.

"From history and ethnology, we know that people from this period took funeral rites very seriously so it is highly unlikely that this positioning was a mistake," said lead researcher Kamila Remisova Vesinova.

"Far more likely is that he was a man with a different sexual orientation, homosexual or transvestite. What we see here does not add up to traditional Corded Ware cultural norms."

Another member of the archaeological team, Katerina Semradova, added: " We believe this is one of the earliest cases of what could be described as a transvestite or third-gender grave in the Czech Republic."
 
Many crossdressers would take offense to being called gay.......

But it is interesting...
 
Unless they found CD's of Broadway show tunes buried with him, I'm not convinced.


j/k :lol:
 
Unless they found CD's of Broadway show tunes buried with him, I'm not convinced.


j/k :lol:

:lol:

It could represent lots of things, including that he worked as a cook.

Of course he could have been gay too.
 
Wirelessly posted (sent from a smartphone. )

So thats 4500 years ago when the scene of crime happened.
 
Wow, talk about making assumptions and jumping to conclusions based on very little scientific evidence.

This is irresponsible archaeology, and even more irresponsible reporting.

How do we know that the man wasn't a stay-at-cave dad and he was buried with his favorite cooking pot or something? Does that make him gay or transvestite? I think people are applying 21st century notions of gender and sexuality to a 5000 year old skeleton.


Also, 2500-2900 BC = "caveman"? Really? Civilizations had been around for thousands of years prior to that...
 
Wow, talk about making assumptions and jumping to conclusions based on very little scientific evidence.

This is irresponsible archaeology, and even more irresponsible reporting.

How do we know that the man wasn't a stay-at-cave dad and he was buried with his favorite cooking pot or something? Does that make him gay or transvestite? I think people are applying 21st century notions of gender and sexuality to a 5000 year old skeleton.


Also, 2500-2900 BC = "caveman"? Really? Civilizations had been around for thousands of years prior to that...
The irony of fate: the popular macho gay hating cook in the bronze age czech village is buried to honor the superb meals he served, only to be buried up again thousands of years later, and declared a silly transexual gay to his millions of grandchildrens.
 
The irony of fate: the popular macho gay hating cook in the bronze age czech village is buried to honor the superb meals he served, only to be buried up again thousands of years later, and declared a silly transexual gay to his millions of grandchildrens.

:lol:

I was thinking in the back of mind - how do they even come to that conclusion based on the items and positioning in the grave? It might have been a different culture where men did the cooking and so forth while the women took charge.
 
I find this thread hilarious!...ummmm...could be that once he tasted his wife's cooking in one or several of the pots...he turned over and "died"...he could have been poisoned...or simply wasn't quite dead when they buried him..and just "rolled over" to the other side.
 
gay people still can have children through the opposite people who can produce to have babies.
 
...How do we know that the man wasn't a stay-at-cave dad and he was buried with his favorite cooking pot or something? Does that make him gay or transvestite?
Maybe it was the flamboyant loincloth he was wearing?
 
If he was gay, would he have any grandchildren?
I was not saying he was gay. Blame my english-as-second language skills if I wrote that. Anyway, I think it's a modern western thing that gay people can't have kids. History books are full of (wo)men who loved (wo)men and had men/wives and kids.
 
If he was gay, would he have any grandchildren?

Being gay doesn't necessarily stop one's abilities to reproduce. Ever heard of surrogate parenting? It's possible he mated with at least one woman.
 
Back
Top