- Joined
- Oct 20, 2006
- Messages
- 7,614
- Reaction score
- 27
oh and I blame seasonal change too. Now it's almost time for me to hibernate back to my bear cave. that will mean less riding, more
![]()
Oh the Humanity!
oh and I blame seasonal change too. Now it's almost time for me to hibernate back to my bear cave. that will mean less riding, more
![]()
Weather was beautiful here. TCS and I took a short ride. Very nice.oh and I blame seasonal change too. Now it's almost time for me to hibernate back to my bear cave. that will mean less riding, more
![]()

No, it's not a secret; it's just irrelevant.
correct me if I'm wrong - there's not a single mention of CCW or guns in the report.
Looks like somebody with training and certification in horticulture poses a much more danger than a CCW holder :Ohno:
Why would CCW be mentioned in a document detailing ILLEGAL activity? Doesn't mean they didn't have one. Just means that it isn't illegal to have a CCW.
To uh... Carry out terrorist attack?
I think a bigger question in here is.... Why would even think about CCW in this case? No need to answer this question because I've had enough tabloid nonsense for today.
Here you go again.
I told you. I was interested in the history of these men. Perhaps you don't see psychological profiles as an interest in criminal activity. I do. As do several others on this forum.
You'd make an excellent researcher for Brady Campaign.
The Brady campaign doesn't do the kind of research I do.