Here we go again. You're just putting more doubt in your story for me.
The reason why:
You said coordinator A is not there.
You said coordinator B was forced out.
And the question says "Is it appropriate for an administrator to ask you questions?"
Since there is NO coordinator - who the hell is supposed to be responsible for the accommodations - the administrators!!!
Hence the reason I said it was entirely acceptable.
Again, to me you're looking like you're trying to pick on them - for what I don't know. You seem to be intelligent. I have high expectations from my fellow intelligent human beings - they can find ways around problems, instead of holding grudges.
It's of absolutely no relevance to me what your expectations are.
I'm trying to pick on them? My question of whether it was appropriate was about trying to find out what others' experiences are with their coordinators.
How many coordinators have you had to deal with in a professional capacity in a college or university setting?
I have had experiences with several coordinators in California and Washington.
My experience with with coordinators in general is they ask "some" relevant questions, and make a determination based on what the answers are, their training and experience, and what resources are available. I never said asking some questions was inappropriate.
Coordinator A was asking a lot of questions to the point where I wondered if he was actually qualified. He'd ask things I had never heard from any coordinator ever.
As for your comment about finding ways around the problem, I tried. I'd meet with Coordinator A's supervisor. That was no help. I'd meet with the vice president of student affairs several times. Not much help there. I met with the provost too. No help there. The entire administration seems to believe there are no problems with the way they support deaf students. They seem to believe that all the problems I and several other deaf students had experienced with our accommodations were acceptable. I would have to say that my experiences as a deaf student at CWU were far and away the worst in all the schools I had ever been.
By the way, if you think my low opinion of CWU's support towards deaf students is only held by me, you'd be mistaken. There are several professionals in the deaf community who agree with me. Coordinator B, who was a nationally certified ASL interpreter with 20+ years of experience, is one of many who think CWU's program for deaf students is more appropriate for a vocational school than a 4-year university.
What would I like for CWU to do? I'd like for them to have a deaf program that offers equal access to deaf students in Washington. Equal access can mean many things. One thing it can mean is that the staff have the necessary training and experience, starting with the coordinator and including the interpreters, CART providers, TypeWell transcribers and whatever other forms of accommodations that would be most appropriate for deaf students. Equal access is not happening at CWU for deaf students because those students are assured of getting better accommodations at any 4-year school in this state and even some 2-year schools.
This is not about my "grudge" or my failure to find away around problems with my accommodations at CWU or things like that. It is about ensuring that all deaf students in Washington have the most opportunities to further their education should they decide to. It is about equality for deaf students. You'd think deaf students could chose to not go to CWU, but that limits their choices because CWU has unique programs that other schools in this state don't have.