jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 22
I certainly did, Charging a person with an additional "hate charge" in a violent crime in no way affects the sentencing in Crack vs Coke.![]()
You are really confused now.

I certainly did, Charging a person with an additional "hate charge" in a violent crime in no way affects the sentencing in Crack vs Coke.![]()
Nah that is why we have different laws such as manslaughter. You are just not thinking it through.
Yep, but there are different degrees of beating of course and the punishment varies. But as I said "assuming all other factors are the same"
Then what about the women? There is also a larger differential in the Asian population yet Asians are a protected minority by "Hate crime laws"
It's funny because people are arguing Crack vs Coke saying they have different sentences based on race, yet they WANT different sentences for the same assault if race was involved. Strange logic
To say 'I long for the Bush and Reagan years again" and show concern for the African American community is diametrically opposed.
I honestly don't know all the reasons why the ratio of men:women in jail are 14:1. There could be a lot of social, psychological factors or something going on during the court. Social-psychology would indicate reason for being involved in a crime: men may vary from women for why they commit crimes.
Like if a guy needed money, he might rob a kwik-e mart or the bank. A woman on the other hand can just become promiscuous as a service for money, slave herself. Who is more likely to be caught and jailed?
It makes me think of women who suspectedly or convictedly thought to have murdered their children: (Casey Anthony, Susan Smith, maybe even JonBenet Ramsey case) You on the other hand, as a male, might not see yourself kiling your children - domestically or corporally punishment you might be more inclined to do, but maybe a woman is more likely to kill them. I don't have numbers for these, but it is just a thought in my head for an explanation to why this 1:14 figure seems weird.
Wow, DD and other statisticians, check this one out.
If we say that crime is equal and happens to everyone equally (ie, 50% good 50% bad random figure) then it would say that the percentage of people in jail should reflect or be equal to the population, right?
Well, I combined both the census and the BoP stats and apparently it's not so. Are blacks, indians, and spanish people really more violent than white and asian folks?If they aren't, then why are there more in jail?
* likely includes hispanics that are detained whose native citizenships are from mexico or south america, etc, so have to be careful of what to assume from that data.Code:Blacks: 38,929,319 (12.6% of USA population) ...in jail: 82,595 (37.9% of jail population) Percentage of black population in jail: 0.212% Hispanics: 50,477,594 (16.3% of USA population) ...in jail: 43,839 (34.3% of jail population*) Percentage of spanish popluation in jail: 0.086%* Whites: 196,817,552 (63.7% of USA population) ...in jail: 31,058 (24.3% of jail population) Percentage of white population in jail: 0.015% Native Indians: 2,932,248 (0.9% of USA population) ...in jail: 4,035 (1.9% of jail population) Percentage of indian population in jail: 0.137% Asians: 14,674,252 (4.8% of USA population) ...in jail: 3,641 (1.7% of jail population) Percentage of asian population in jail: 0.024%
I've spent a large part of my life working in a North Philadelphia black community trying to help dually diagnosed drug addicts.
I've watched year after year go by and the conditions continue to get worse.
I've watched politicians in bed with the teachers union continue to produce schools that dropout rates get higher and higher every year.
I've watched politicians protect teachers unions who donate to their campaigns by preventing school reform or school choice.
Preventing poor minority students from getting the same quality education that wealthy white kids in the suburbs get.
And I watch the cycle of poverty continue...
It's very sad, and I have become very cynical over the years because I have witnessed it first hand.
Thank you so very much for this post. I can read and understand it completely.
What the data does NOT show is the reason women are in jail.
So see if you can get jillio to take a good look at your data because her post #631 is a royal screw-up.
I think it is if race is the reason for the attack.
Dear Victim,
While we realize you sustained severe injuries when your neighbor, who hated the color you painted your house, lost his temper and attacked you with a bat. It is our opinion we can not charge your attacker with the same crime as Jim Bob Bubba because Jim Bob Bubba's crime resulted from his dislike for skin color rather than paint color.
Best Wishes
Social Justice
Perhaps it is because you are attempting to help them from your own ethnocentric perspective. That is rarely effective.
I would have to know more about your program, and more about the theorerical perspective you use, as well as your credentials and your particular thereotical perspective and how you apply it to your treatment modalities, but if you are willing to provide that, we can engage in an indepth discussion of perhaps why the program isn't working.
Oh so
Got it
Just for you, Jillio:
Had Philly, Detroit, Camden, been run by Republicans, the outcomes would be the same!
There is no incentive to change anything when there is no threat of being thrown of of office.
And that is why we have difference in sentencing based on hate crimes.
Check and check mate.
Mayors sign bills passed through the city legislators. Mayors also help influence Governors in what laws get passed at a State level.
Lol! I wasn't trying to help them from a "ethnocentric" point of view. I worked in an African American owned, African American staffed drug rehabilitation out patient facility. In the poorest area of North Philadelphia.
Then what about the women? There is also a larger differential in the Asian population yet Asians are a protected minority by "Hate crime laws"
It's funny because people are arguing Crack vs Coke saying they have different sentences based on race, yet they WANT different sentences for the same assault if race was involved. Strange logic
No that is the fallacy of "hate crime laws"Equal damage, unequal punishment is not equal justice.
![]()
If he had of attacked the house, it would have been a hate crime.![]()
Wrong, it would have been vandalism.
so what would a libertarian party do in this case?