Beowulf said:
Well, Taylor, I see you are studiously avoiding any mention of that security cam video. Can you explain that? Don't tell me you think that is a 757.
Rather recently I submitted a link showing the OUTSIDE of the Pentagon, and it was pretty obvious that there was hardly any damage to the Pentagon wall. It was still standing intact, and a CNN reporter was attesting that he could not find more than small pieces of debris on the lawn. The video was not closed captioned, so it was difficult to knw what he was saying. Perhaps you could listen for me and tell me what he really says, i could be wrong.
http://www.total911.info/2005/02/video-cnn-reported-no-plane-hit.html
And as for the question of why no other missiles were involved...who says there aren't? Look at the flash in the following link.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/index.htm
We could argue over this till we're blue in the face, and I will take a sabbath from this subject for a little while. But I am most assuredly not letting it go. I notice more people are discussing this 911 matter and not being so timid in asking questions.
The movement for the truth will keep going to its inevitable conclusion.
I'll translate it for you. He does mention that at the beginning, but you have to look at the entire transcript to understand what he is talking about:
From my close up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building thats crashed in and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail section, wing sections, a fuselodge, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed in to the side of pentagon and then caused this side to collapse. now, even though if you look at the pictures of the pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
As you see, he goes on to explain that there is no tail section, wing sections or other parts that would indicate that it was a plane. Any visible pieces were small enough to fit into the hand. As I've mentioned, and I thought was common knowledge until 9/11 was that when a plane crashes, there often isn't large debris, let alone identifiable parts. It happens if a plane comes in flat and hits the ground as its level, there will be identifiable parts...but a jetliner that impacts at a 90 degree angle, whether its the ground or a building, there won't be much left to it but a bunch of small fragments.
And as for the question of why no other missiles were involved...who says there aren't? Look at the flash in the following link.
I was on the air at radio station on 9/11. I remember being glued to the TV in the studio...and myself along with other people saw an image similar to this:
Sure looks like a cruise missle and not a commercial airliner to me.
Well, Taylor, I see you are studiously avoiding any mention of that security cam video. Can you explain that? Don't tell me you think that is a 757.
What did I avoid? I broke each image down and talked about each one. Look at that video again, compare the 'object' to the right to the pentagon at the left. It is a fairly sizable object that is coming in...while difficult to identify exactly what it is from that video, it is large and traveling at a high rate of speed...and when I say 'large' I say the size of a 757.
Lets look at a couple of other things while we are at it. Prior to 9/11, we were able to fly around the Pentagon. I am familar with where that camera is at the corner edge of the Pentagon. Take a look at what I believe to have occured:
Lets start with a photo Pre-911
Here is a link to a very large photo I have of the Pentagon from above (post 9/11). Be sure to click the little icon in the picture that Windows puts there so you can see the large image (windows automatically resizes large images to fit into your monitor). I will scale it down momentarily but the large one helps you put it into perspective.
That photo is
HERE (again, its big so take a look around and get a feel for the surroundings. It gives you an idea of just how big the Pentagon is.
Lets break it down. I've chopped out the surround area to give us an image we can work with. I've pointed out where the Camera is located. I've pointed out where the Heli-pad is...and I've pointed out the point of impact.
Lets add some lines to one of the photos from the security camera to give you an idea of angles and distance. You'll see the area of impact and where the Helipad is:
Lets do an overhead of the pentagon with those same lines in place:
So, in my opinion, the object you see in the camera is quite a distance away and not directly in front of the camera....What you are seeing is certainly large enough to be a 757.
I have a photo somewhere (looking for it now) of when I was flying traffic and we flew over national airport (prior to 9/11 we were allowed to). In this photo, there is a 757 visible on the runway underneath of us as I snapped the picture. We were at approx 1300 feet overhead and he was on the runway. It gives a good perspective as to what a 757 looks like from 1300 feet.
