Two black suspects assaults 88 yr WWII vet

It wasn't enough to just rob the man, they had to beat him to death. I hope they put them away forever when they find them.
 
It wasn't enough to just rob the man, they had to beat him to death. I hope they put them away forever when they find them.

I hope they share a jail cell with someone just as morally depraved as they are....
 
I appreciate your answer, Reba. :wave:
But how is that a description any more than "white person attacked World War 2 Vet" " would be a description? People of all races and ethnicities have various appearance and details to them....

Why mention race in the title? Why not say, "Two Man Brutally Killed a Man who is a WWII Veteran"

Then we leave Al Shepard and reverend Jackson out of it and focus on what the local authorities are doing to bring justice for the victim. Bringing race and protestors in this is not going to help matters.

What happened in the Martin case was a tragedy for both the shooter and the victim but what does it have to do with this case just like what do Shepard and Jackson as well?

That's the problem with America these days.

Might as well bring OJ Simpson and Johnny Concran into it while we are at it.:roll:
 
Why mention race in the title? Why not say, "Two Man Brutally Killed a Man who is a WWII Veteran"

Then we leave Al Shepard and reverend Jackson out of it and focus on what the local authorities are doing to bring justice for the victim. Bringing race and protestors in this is not going to help matters.

What happened in the Martin case was a tragedy for both the shooter and the victim but what does it have to do with this case just like what do Shepard and Jackson as well?

That's the problem with America these days.

Might as well bring OJ Simpson and Johnny Concran into it while we are at it.:roll:

Oh....dont forget Jeffrey Dahmer or the Midnight Stalker into it as well.
 
Why mention race in the title? Why not say, "Two Man Brutally Killed a Man who is a WWII Veteran"

Then we leave Al Shepard and reverend Jackson out of it and focus on what the local authorities are doing to bring justice for the victim. Bringing race and protestors in this is not going to help matters.

What happened in the Martin case was a tragedy for both the shooter and the victim but what does it have to do with this case just like what do Shepard and Jackson as well?

That's the problem with America these days.

Might as well bring OJ Simpson and Johnny Concran into it while we are at it.:roll:
What Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson did didn't help matters, either, being the race-baiters they are by profiting off of it.
 
What Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson did didn't help matters, either, being the race-baiters they are by profiting off of it.

Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson are important person to you? :ugh:
 
You have better to say instead of make political discussion and trolling me. :roll:

No, my VR evaluation and English professors show that my English is below than average. I have reading problem and have trouble to understand - I have LD in reading and slow learning since childhood. I do not understand any words that are strong or right choice - it means I don't think that "hate" is strong word.
To be honest, your English is much better than alot of my deaf friends. :)

I don't think hate is a strong word, either. Example: I don't like Sarah Palin. I dislike Sarah Palin. I hate Sarah Palin. All of them mean the same thing. It doesn't necessarily involve a desire to cause a physical harm to her. Another example: some people hate gays but they leave them alone.
 
I'm curious, what has our Commander in Chief said about the killing of one of his country's veterans?
 
...I don't think hate is a strong word, either. Example: I don't like Sarah Palin. I dislike Sarah Palin. I hate Sarah Palin. All of them mean the same thing....
No, they don't mean the same thing. Why do you think they are different words? It's because they have different meanings.
 
To be honest, your English is much better than alot of my deaf friends. :)

I don't think hate is a strong word, either. Example: I don't like Sarah Palin. I dislike Sarah Palin. I hate Sarah Palin. All of them mean the same thing. It doesn't necessarily involve a desire to cause a physical harm to her. Another example: some people hate gays but they leave them alone.

Yes, I realized my English is better than other people and in some case, some of my grammars are perfect. :ty:

I have same feeling about what you said about hate - it seems not strong word to me but it is strong word to some people like Reba.

Sometime, I don't have best decision about words will be fit - I use "troubled teen" and I don't think it was excuse. There is no excuse to kill anyone for no reason and I have no sympathy for murderers (adults and teens alike).
 
I'm curious, what has our Commander in Chief said about the killing of one of his country's veterans?

I think about want type a letter to remind our Commander in Chief to make statement about WWII veteran. :hmm:

I have seen some news about cold blooded thugs killed homeless veterans and some states (Florida is one of them) passed the bill to make hate crime to attack on homeless people.
 
...I have same feeling about what you said about hate - it seems not strong word to me but it is strong word to some people like Reba….
No, it's not just a strong word to me. It is a strong word according to its definition.
 
I think about want type a letter to remind our Commander in Chief to make statement about WWII veteran. :hmm:

I have seen some news about cold blooded thugs killed homeless veterans and some states (Florida is one of them) passed the bill to make hate crime to attack on homeless people.
Note: "hate" crime, not "dislike" crime.
 
I tried to make fair statement for you in private messaging but you chose to sticking with your way. I do not think that you understand about my point so that why I'm no longer to discuss with you.

No, I don't see any of my posts are trolling, however you trolled me because you made unnecessary attack about my situation.

I had actually explained to you that I disagreed with you about Benghazi. You had initiated the entire conversation as you had an "axe to grind" or some sort of agenda. I do not believe Benghazi was a "right wing conspiracy" like you were saying. I pointed out that the Special Forces Operators that are specifically trained to defend US embassies under attack were ordered to stand down. I also explained that there is only one person who can give that order, the commander-in-chief. I also explained to you that I have family members in the Special Forces, and a few are current operators. We never know where they are. Since I have family members, we do talk about "cool" stuff every once in a while. Nothing classified.

I then went on to elaborate that this administration blamed the whole Benghazi incident on an obscure youtube video that sparked a totally random riot. In other words, they believe the average American to be an idiot. When it was pointed out that this was a planned terrorist attack, and was not anything even remotely related to an obscure youtube video, Hillary Clinton very angrily replied "At this point, what difference does it make?"

Again, the assumption that the average American is an idiot.

After all of this was explained to you, in great painstaking detail, you went off on a very hateful diatribe targeting the Republican members on this forum. You then blocked me so I couldn't reply. This tells me that you know just how hateful you are, LD or not.
 
Back
Top