Rolling Stone 'rock star' treatment for accused Boston bomber?

Freedom of speech does not mean you can say what ever you want. For instance defamation of character is illegal as well as yelling fire in a theater.
OFC, it's illegal to give false alarm if there's actually no fire.

The press such as National Enquirer always defames many celebrities/entertainers but it's legal. It's up to them to sue the press. Most of them ignore it (some laugh their ass off). I remember Carol Burnett won a lawsuit against that company for libel.
 
That's what I meant. You can't yell fire if there is not fire. You can if there is :lol:
 
The U.S. Constitution:

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I stand corrected: Thank you, Reba.

But, I would just like to point out the following:

While personal freedom of speech is usually respected, freedom of press and mass publishing meet with some restrictions. Some of the recent issues include:

See also Roth v. United States

As of 2002, the United States was ranked 17th of 167 countries in annual Worldwide Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders. "The poor ranking of the United States (17th) is mainly because of the number of journalists arrested or imprisoned there. Arrests are often because they refuse to reveal their sources in court. Also, since the September 11 attacks, several journalists have been arrested for crossing security lines at some official buildings." In the 2006 index the United States fell further to 53rd of 168 countries; indeed, "relations between the media and the Bush administration sharply deteriorated" as it became suspicious of journalists who questioned the "War on Terrorism". The zeal of federal courts which, unlike those in 33 U.S. states, refuse to recognize the media's right not to reveal its sources, even threatened journalists whose investigations did not pertain to terrorism. The United States improved, moving up to 48th place in 2007, however, and to 20th in 2010. "Barack Obama's election as president and the fact that he has a less hawkish approach than his predecessor have had a lot to do with this."[34]
 
Now, I do have to admit, this is an interesting point. Could the board of health rule that the magazine is unhealthy or can cause mental health issues?

I guess the police could say that Rolling Stone cover of the Boston bomber could encourage other people to the same. I bet the terrorists like the cover. I hope the cop that put out the photos of the bomber with red target on his head does not lose his job. Someone brought up a good point that some photo like that just be show on TV already.
 
But I heard if a woman was getting rape she would get help faster yelling
FIRE! I have no idea if this is true.
I don't think it would help because once people hear someone yelling "Fire", they would leave the area immediately.
 
Back
Top