kokonut
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 16,006
- Reaction score
- 2
More like an educated assumption.
More like harassment.
More like an educated assumption.
highly speculative and a waste of time. why don't we leave it to Judge to decide whether or not if it warrants revoking his bond. Apparently he had enough reason to revoke it.
More like harassment.
Oh? So what do you call all the blah blah blah stuff that I originally replied to, or are we walking the gangplank to troll and bait academy?
He made a targeted assumption on what a commenter would think and say, too, in this thread? All I saw is that he voiced his own opinion about a subject matter not involving a commenter.

And I replied. The difference: his opinion most closely matches yours, so you feel inclined to "big brother" him. Why not focus on the actual content, rather than the poster?![]()
No big brother here.
Actual content? Did you just see wrote in post #77? I'm fine for sticking to the actual content.
I stick by my reply. You defend the other side, if you wish. The facts are:
- He had 2 passports
- The judge revoked his bail for cause
Everything that followed (post 77) was speculation as to the validity of that decision.
Fine. Focus on the issue then...not the poster you want to speculate about what he or she might have reacted in a certain scenario. It'd be making a pointless argument.
The judge felt differently. I have no opinion on his decision, other than he most likely had more facts to work with than I do.
I think they call it reporting.
They told us that he had two passports, and he had his bail revoked. I gotta say, if the tables were turned, and this 17 year old black male was the shooter, you would have been screaming foul if he was even granted bail in the first place.
Perhaps you are forgetting how the media initially reported this story? Oh, and the reporters that got canned?
Perhaps you are forgetting how the media initially reported this story? Oh, and the reporters that got canned?
uuuummm actually it's an issue and it's certainly not about racism. he was facing a possible revocation due to his credibility issue.
and now it's been revoked because Judge Lester was clearly not happy to see that Zimmerman and his wife may have misled the court about their financial status.
George Zimmerman bond revoked - Orlando Sentinel
I never said it was about racism, I said it was about being a "flight risk". You still didn't answer the question. Did GZ leave the country? Did he attempt to flee?
I never said it was about racism, I said it was about being a "flight risk". You still didn't answer the question. Did GZ leave the country? Did he attempt to flee?
I never said it was about racism, I said it was about being a "flight risk". You still didn't answer the question. Did GZ leave the country? Did he attempt to flee?

Wow you just don't get it!! Zimmerman lied in court about how much money he had about his passport. It is illegal to lie to in court. Why do think Zimmerman should be about the law??