Zimmerman's Bail Revoked

[Jiro]

Nope the quote came from my post.

actually you were wrong in case you didn't know.

The PROSECUTION must prove beyond a reasonable doubt at trial but must only prove by preponderance in the immunity hearing.

that would be incorrect

 

[TXgolfer]

actually you were wrong in case you didn't know.



that would be incorrect

Ah you missed the point.... The point is the bar for the defense is much lower at trial than in an immunity hearing. With preponderance one side has to win by 51% theoretically. Essentially it is the same standard as a civil case. No biggie.

 

[saywhatkid]

Interesting view. I don't take prozac so I can't see things from your angle.

I would need much more than prozac to see things your way.

 

[Jiro]

Ah you missed the point.... The point is the bar for the defense is much lower at trial than in an immunity hearing. With preponderance one side has to win by 51% theoretically. Essentially it is the same standard as a civil case. No biggie.

sssssssshhhhhhhh...... you were wrong. clearly. end of case

 

[Steinhauer]

I would need much more than prozac to see things your way.

(yeah, like a formal education for starters)

Did you make that one up all by yourself? :roll:

 

[Foxrac]

sssssssshhhhhhhh...... you were wrong. clearly. end of case

It isn't good to feed the quibbler.

Let think about alligators spread to NJ and NYC due to climate change.

 

[TXgolfer]

sssssssshhhhhhhh...... you were wrong. clearly. end of case

If it makes you feel better to believe that.

Yes taken out of context it could appear to be incorrect. I left out a "they" but oh well.

 

[rockin'robin]

I would need much more than prozac to see things your way.

Here....have a couple of swigs from my Mason jar full of white lightning I brought back from the backwoods in NC....It's guaranteed.

 

[TXgolfer]

Here....have a couple of swigs from my Mason jar full of white lightning I brought back from the backwoods in NC....It's guaranteed.

Have had some of that before..... Woooooo

 

[Jiro]

If it makes you feel better to believe that.

Yes taken out of context it could appear to be incorrect. I left out a "they" but oh well.

wwoooooowwwwww I never thought you could continue to spin this even further when in fact you were clearly wrong on the part that it falls on prosecutor's burden in immunity hearing. It's actually on defense's burden in immunity hearing.

oh well. this is just too sad and painful to see you continuing this comical farce.

 

[TXgolfer]

wwoooooowwwwww I never thought you could continue to spin this even further when in fact you were clearly wrong on the part that it falls on prosecutor's burden in immunity hearing. It's actually on defense's burden in immunity hearing.

oh well. this is just too sad and painful to see you continuing this comical farce.

Again, I left out one word... But it's ok. No biggie. I had already covered the "defense choice" in a post prior to the one you are referring to so the meaning of that post should have still been clear. Oh well.

 

[saywhatkid]

(yeah, like a formal education for starters)

Did you make that one up all by yourself? :roll:

Troll much? I don't beat around the bush like you. Try it. See if they ban you. I still have a membership.

BTW, if formal education delineates level of intelligence, you better check in for a refund, with interest. Your grammar alone is downright frightening.

However, it would be good to focus on your defense of Zimmerman, and conviction of the DA. It suits you. Is the DA black, by chance?