ah of course you would say that. please do continue on spinning and twisting.
And do continue to make links say only what you want them to say, that is comical

ah of course you would say that. please do continue on spinning and twisting.

Why twist my post? That's not exactly what I said. BTW, if they don't welcome her back, that's a shame.
And do continue to make links say only what you want them to say, that is comical![]()
Despite its prominence, several profound misconceptions exist about Roe. These misconceptions help to explain why it remains so controversial 36 years after it was handed down.
The first misconception is that the right to abortion has constitutional roots. But Roe’s justification actually derives from an abstract interpretation of the 14th Amendment’s premise of liberty and the malleable concept of a right to privacy found not in the actual text of the Constitution but rather in its “penumbras” and emanations. These foundations are so dubious that even leading lights on the left have criticized Roe’s legal reasoning. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for example, has called Roe “heavy-handed judicial intervention.”
A second misconception is that Americans overwhelming support Roe v. Wade. But the public remains remarkably uninformed about what the court ruling means. The left has done a great job convincing many Americans that Roe is simply a synonym for abortion rights and that, if one supports even a limited right to abortion, one must also support Roe.
In a 2007 study of registered voters, respondents were asked whether they wanted Roe overturned. A majority (55 percent) said no, while 34 percent said yes. But when respondents were told what Roe means — that it prohibits states from limiting abortion during the first six months of pregnancy and that, if Roe were overturned, states could pass laws that would permit abortion — the share who opposed reversing Roe dropped 7 points, to 48 percent. Meanwhile, the number of people who supported overturning Roe jumped 9 points, to 43 percent. That’s a 16-point swing.
The survey actually understated how extreme Roe is. For instance, surveyors didn’t explain that the “health” exception to late-term prohibitions is so expansive that abortion is effectively available for any reason through all nine months of pregnancy, something most Americans oppose.
Another misconception concerns what would happen if Roe were overturned. The day after Roe’s reversal, abortion policy would revert back to the states. Some states would severely restrict abortion, while a bigger group of more populous states would likely pass laws guaranteeing the same access to abortion they have now. So, far from ending the abortion battle, Roe’s reversal would mark the beginning of a battle to which the past 35 years have been a prelude.
A post-Roe America would look like the America of today in terms of the sheer volume of abortions. The major difference would be an anti-abortion movement toiling to tackle 50 separate abortion policies simultaneously. Another important difference is that we would no longer teach young Americans the lie that — among their cherished constitutional rights of free speech, religion and assembly — there is also a right to take the life of an unborn baby.
A final misconception about Roe is one too often held by its opponents: that Roe’s reversal is the ultimate anti-abortion goal and that support for constitutional protections for the unborn betrays the federalist principles of conservatism. But by asserting states’ rights, Roe’s anti-abortion opposition effectively (if unwittingly) accepts Roe’s reasoning that prenatal life is not a due process right within the constitutional framework and, therefore, that the unborn child is not a constitutional “person.”
Excuse me, I don't read all cap lock so well and I felt that you are shouting at me.
I have therapist and psychiatrist who diagnose me with bipolar disorder and they don't say if it was hereditary or not, even sometime, it is unknown. There is no test to make proper diagnose on bipolar, just only mental evaluation do.
Lastly, the bipolar disorder is underdiagnosed for me and I have none of my families who diagnose with bipolar disorder.
better ask him if his church would kick'em out or not.
I seriously doubt that any Christian church worth it's salt would kick any woman out for having an abortion. Most would not condone it but they would support her in her grief. Or at least they should.
oh you don't want to hear facts? I see.
Opinion: Debunking myths of Roe v. Wade - Gary Bauer - POLITICO.com
grief?
Like I said, you want your links to say only what you want them to.
This link in NO WAY speaks about stopping a beating heart and that is the whole point you are ignoring from the beginning. Go back and re-read post #224.
Yes grief! Any woman who has ever had an abortion will tell you that they grieved! Just ask those that have if you have the nerve to do so. I have done so personally and have heard their stories. Depression and grief. Sometimes even heath problems or complications from the "procedure". Sad!
I would be willing to bet that 99.9% don't have a party after they have an abortion! They grieve and are depressed. Part of their body has been ripped out of them! It is a physical and psychological change in their body and mind! If they have any conscience then they will be thinking about what they have done for years to come!
ah... then you understand why abortion should remain legal otherwise... your churchgoer could die from back alley abortion with a coat hanger.
exactly!!! lot of people seem to think abortion is like a drive-thru birth control facility.
NOPE! That has happened even during the legal days! It is still killing a human! Mostly no excuses! I only agree in rape, incest or life of mother being threatened! Then only in very early stage. Very few cases like these. Very few!
Do you realize that most pregnancies that have serious birth defects end naturally in miscarriage?!
has that ever happened?
Unfortunately some do use it like that!
Sorry foxrac, I guess I kind of was yelling and that is rude of me. But my point is that bi-polar IS hereditary and that means one had it from birth. I'm not saying that all bi-polar diagnosed people had it in their family genes but probably did somewhere on one side or the other in the past. Maybe someday they will come up with a test that conclusively finds bi-polar disorder. Yes it is diagnosed by observing behaviors and by a psychiatrist. Do you take medication for it?
Aborting because of deafness? YES it has happened many times. My mom is a nurse, she knows. Terible tragedy and no value of human life. So sad and wrong.
what do you think in majority of abortions - what's the reason?