Heinous

Status
Not open for further replies.

kokonut

New Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
16,006
Reaction score
2
Video sting shows complicity in 'sex-selective' abortions | The Daily Caller
“In this video, what is astounding is that Rebecca, the Planned Parenthood counselor, starts arranging with the actor about how to get a late-term abortion,” Rose said. “To wait until her pregnancy is so developed that — and using Medicaid for this, using the state to pay for the ultrasound to determine the gender, and then to do a late term abortion if it was a little girl.”

Ok. How about this, allow late term abortion once a fetus is identified as having a hearing loss and then do an abortion?
 
what deafness got do with it...abortion re sex of fetus is appualling as is abortion because of deafness.;if having abortion because pregnancy mistake and not cope with pregnancy and baby then that your right i agree with abortion but not if doing it for disability or wrong sex
 
Truly a sad statement of the digression of our society! SICK! Really sick & wrong!
 
what deafness got do with it...abortion re sex of fetus is appualling as is abortion because of deafness.;if having abortion because pregnancy mistake and not cope with pregnancy and baby then that your right i agree with abortion but not if doing it for disability or wrong sex

Abortion is abortion regardless of the reason when it comes having the "right to choose" or decide. The reasoning doesn't matter because the results are still the same whether because one isn't ready to have a baby, one does not like the sex of the baby or one doesn't want to be burdened with a baby born with a disability.
 
Abortion is not for me, seems if you’re going to have sex (unprotected) then except the results.
 
What is their reason for not wanting a baby girl?

Is it because having a girl is expensive like clothes, shoes, makeup (cosmetics/beauty products), earrings, etc when she grows up?

I have one 17 yrs old daughter who costs me alot but I still love her dearly.
 
BTW, they have been doing this in China for many years, due to the One Child policy. The Chinese in rural areas tend to like males, because they can do more farm work. Hence, the chart below reflects that.
 

Attachments

  • Pyramide_ChineauthorfargomeDCC-BY-SA-470x325.png
    Pyramide_ChineauthorfargomeDCC-BY-SA-470x325.png
    66.5 KB · Views: 6
i support abortion. just saying

And I support your right to choose and will defend your choice.
What I do not care for is a group of people trying to tell everyone else how to choose and condemning the ones who choose another path. (Any path)
 
Cool strawman!

No. It's showing the one side of a person's hypocrisy by supporting abortion (as a choice) but wouldn't support such an abortion if the reason for an abortion (as a choice) was to not have a baby because of a different sex or a baby with a known disability (e.g. deafness, blindness, cerebral palsy, mental retardation, etc). After all, if having an abortion is a choice then aborting a fetus if found to be deaf is just as "logical" over a choice on aborting a fetus because one isn't ready for a baby.
 
No. It's showing the one side of a person's hypocrisy by supporting abortion (as a choice) but wouldn't support such an abortion if the reason for an abortion (as a choice) was to not have a baby because of a different sex or a baby with a known disability (e.g. deafness, blindness, cerebral palsy, mental retardation, etc). After all, if having an abortion is a choice then aborting a fetus if found to be deaf is just as "logical" over a choice on aborting a fetus because one isn't ready for a baby.

You are suggesting that someone supports aborting a fetus for no reason at all, or because they want a new car instead of the expenses of a baby, but is against doing it because it might be born deaf? Where is this?
 
Abortion is abortion regardless of the reason when it comes having the "right to choose" or decide. The reasoning doesn't matter because the results are still the same whether because one isn't ready to have a baby, one does not like the sex of the baby or one doesn't want to be burdened with a baby born with a disability.

this is your business..... how?

this affects you...... how?
 
this is your business..... how?

this affects you...... how?

Easy..... It influences the course of our nation....that should be important to everyone.
 
Easy..... It influences the course of our nation....that should be important to everyone.

Supreme Court disagrees with you. the nation disagrees with you. that's why the law legalizes it.

and I don't see how it influences the course of our nation. how? in what way?
 
You are suggesting that someone supports aborting a fetus for no reason at all, or because they want a new car instead of the expenses of a baby, but is against doing it because it might be born deaf? Where is this?

Whatever the reason for the abortion. This is all about choice, right? If one wants to abort a fetus that is found to bve deaf, for example, ought to be perfectly fine because it all falls in line regarding the right to choose to have an abortion. Right?
 
Whatever the reason for the abortion. This is all about choice, right? If one wants to abort a fetus that is found to bve deaf, for example, ought to be perfectly fine because it all falls in line regarding the right to choose to have an abortion. Right?

has that ever happened?
 
Supreme Court disagrees with you. the nation disagrees with you. that's why the law legalizes it.

and I don't see how it influences the course of our nation. how? in what way?

Basically my statement was on whether Koko has a right to have an opinion. (How is it his business?) The Supreme Court and the Constitution very much support me on this. :lol:
 
Basically my statement was on whether Koko has a right to have an opinion. (How is it his business?) The Supreme Court and the Constitution very much support me on this. :lol:

and the Supreme Court and Constitution very much support women's rights to abortion.

but you and koko are attempting to interfere with that rights so I'm asking you and koko how is it your business?
 
Basically my statement was on whether Koko has a right to have an opinion. (How is it his business?) The Supreme Court and the Constitution very much support me on this. :lol:

Certainly, I dont' see anywhere in the U.S. Constitution or the Supreme Court that says people cannot have an opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top