Obama's Legacy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Poor Chris Matthews of MSNBC, he just outed himself as being a lackey for Obama. Not really a journalist but an activist with a tv program. We knew that all along and how he had this thrill that went up and down his leg. Now, that thrill drips down his legs into a puddle beneath his feet. Here's a partial transcript of what he said:

In a Sunday evening interview on MSNBC, “Hardball” host Chris Matthews spoke candidly not just of his allegiance to the president’s agenda, but also of the frustrations many on the professional left are feeling with the administration’s lack of leadership.

“There’s nothing to root for,” Matthews lamented. “What are we trying to do in this administration? Why does he want a second term, would he tell us? What’s he going to do in his second term, more of this? Is this it? Is this as good as it gets? Where are we going? Are we going to do something his second term? He’s yet to tell us.”

“He has not said one thing about what he’d do in his second term,” Matthews continued. “He never tells us what he’s going to do with reforming our health care systems, Medicare, Medicaid. How he’s going to reform Social Security? Is he going to deal with long-term debt? How? Is he going to reform the tax system? How?”

“Just tell us — why are we in this with him? Just tell us, commander. Give us our orders and tell us where we’re going. Give us the mission.”

“And he hasn’t done it,” Matthews said, blaming not just the president but those closest to him in the White House.

“I think it’s the people around him,” Matthews asserted. “Too many people around are little kids with propeller hats on their heads. They’re all virtual — politics, the social networking. … Their idea of running a campaign is a virtual universe of sending emails around to people.”
Click to expand...

Read more: Chris Matthews | MSNBC | Obama | The Daily Caller

StageRightShow's Channel - YouTube

Captioning is, well, eh. Probably captured 60 to 70% of what he said correctly. I wonder if Matt will do a golf story on Obama?
 
kokonut said:
Poor Chris Matthews of MSNBC, he just outed himself as being a lackey for Obama. Not really a journalist but an activist with a tv program. We knew that all along and how he had this thrill that went up and down his leg. Now, that thrill drips down his legs into a puddle beneath his feet. Here's a partial transcript of what he said:



Read more: Chris Matthews | MSNBC | Obama | The Daily Caller

StageRightShow's Channel - YouTube

Captioning is, well, eh. Probably captured 60 to 70% of what he said correctly. I wonder if Matt will do a golf story on Obama?
Click to expand...

Isn't doing golf stories on Obama your job? You are such a joke.:laugh2: Conveniently overlooked this quote:

“There’s nothing to root for,” Matthews lamented. “What are we trying to do in this administration? Why does he want a second term, would he tell us? What’s he going to do in his second term, more of this? Is this it? Is this as good as it gets? Where are we going? Are we going to do something his second term? He’s yet to tell us.”

Your selective reading is why you make so many mistakes.
 
kokonut said:
Poor Chris Matthews of MSNBC, he just outed himself as being a lackey for Obama. Not really a journalist but an activist with a tv program. We knew that all along and how he had this thrill that went up and down his leg. Now, that thrill drips down his legs into a puddle beneath his feet. Here's a partial transcript of what he said:



Read more: Chris Matthews | MSNBC | Obama | The Daily Caller

StageRightShow's Channel - YouTube

Captioning is, well, eh. Probably captured 60 to 70% of what he said correctly. I wonder if Matt will do a golf story on Obama?
Click to expand...

I guess Matt did.

Matthews Obama Economy | Obama Christie Economy | Video | Mediaite

The thrill is gone....I think he's realizing now that he and millions others have been duped by the Messiah with his latest rant.
 
kokonut said:
Kind of like getting more credit cards and use them to help pay off other previous credit cards debts? And repeat that indefinitely?

Rather an insane thing to do.
Click to expand...

Yes it is, but your goal in this case is different. During recession, you're not trying to get rid of debt so much as control the flow of money. You are trying to disperse wealth (to the right people) which is what makes the economy run. Productivity is an illusion, what really matters is the flow money and if people don't have it they can't make it flow.

Now, who gets the money is, of course, a great argument, but there is no question that the money has to be given in order to get the economy moving again.
 
VacationGuy234 said:
Yes it is, but your goal in this case is different. During recession, you're not trying to get rid of debt so much as control the flow of money. You are trying to disperse wealth (to the right people) which is what makes the economy run. Productivity is an illusion, what really matters is the flow money and if people don't have it they can't make it flow.

Now, who gets the money is, of course, a great argument, but there is no question that the money has to be given in order to get the economy moving again.
Click to expand...

The credit cards example is an apt one. The ability to control the flow of money increasingly gets harder only because the interest owed gets higher and higher each year where more and more of our money will get diverted to. Spending is part of the bigger problem here.
 
kokonut said:
The credit cards example is an apt one. The ability to control the flow of money increasingly gets harder only because the interest owed gets higher and higher each year where more and more of our money will get diverted to. Spending is part of the bigger problem here.
Click to expand...

No it isn't. It is just one that conservatives with no understanding of an economic system use. And you keep repeating. Showing that you have no understanding, either.
 
Babyblue said:
Now that just do not make sense. A deaf horse? :roll:
Click to expand...

Goes back to the other thread where posters were "beating a dead horse to death".
Now they are beating a "deaf horse" (i.e. me)
In the meantime the national debt went up-up-and-away (source: National Debt Clock)
 
jillio said:
You are such a 30 Watt. The newspaper posted their source and then you plagairised it. Your source was the newspaper.

**jillio smacking rolling7 on the nose with a rolled up newspaper**

If you want to come across as having any credibility and any intelligence at all, stop plagairizing other people's work and claiming it as your own. :roll:
Click to expand...

It is called "inevitable discovery".....you can thank me for todays legal lesson
Stop being violent and hitting people, it'll get you thrown in jail (and I ain't talking about AD jail).
 
rolling7 said:
Goes back to the other thread where posters were "beating a dead horse to death".
Now they are beating a "deaf horse" (i.e. me)
In the meantime the national debt went up-up-and-away (source: National Debt Clock)
Click to expand...

That's even funnier :laugh2:

Try saying "Beating a dead horse"
 
rolling7 said:
It is called "inevitable discovery".....you can thank me for todays legal lesson
Stop being violent and hitting people, it'll get you thrown in jail (and I ain't talking about AD jail).
Click to expand...

You obviously don't know anything more about legal issues than you do about citing your sources.:roll:
 
deafskeptic said:
Beating a dead horse to the death is a bit redundant. :giggle:
Click to expand...

Yeah, if the horse is already dead, how do you beat it to death a second time?

Maybe he meant, "beating a deaf horse to death.":lol:
 
rolling7 said:
Perhaps it is time to put Santa Clause in the White House, he seems to be the only fellow capable of getting jobs for America.
Click to expand...

ho ho ho!

lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top