Another, "I didn't do it!"

Status
Not open for further replies.
rolling7 said:
Want to be reported as a BULLY?

trolling does NOT include an answer to a post put to me my a member.
You do NOT get to dictate what others ask me nor do you get to dictate my respond.
Click to expand...

I started the thread. Troll my thread and I will report you for such. Very simple.
 
Jiro said:
ah ok. this is the fact -

1. Newt Gingrich had an affair.
2. Four(?) women have came out and said they were sexually-harassed by Cain.

Whether or not if Cain sexually-harassed them is an issue of credibility - no doubt. Was it part of filthy low-ball smear campaign aka "Character Assassination"? probably. probably not. Did it really happen? probably. probably not. But we can look in the past and the history has shown that countless of men in power have repeatedly sexually-harassed or raped women and made them disappear by offering a hush hush money or a job somewhere far away. I wouldn't be surprised if women took the deal along with non-disclosure agreement because they knew very well that they stand no chance against men in power or they'll risk their own character assassination too.
Click to expand...

Your original post referred to them as POTUS, so I'm assuming you meant they are elected and did something equal or worst than Clinton did as POTUS.
 
Cheetah said:
Well, it's all ready out there. :dunno:
Click to expand...

How would the American public be aware that there was anything to investigate if it wasn't?:lol:

I suspect he tried to keep it from public knowlege, given that it is the public that casts the votes, but most voters want to know more about the candidates than whether they have an R or a D after their name.
 
rolling7 said:
Your original post referred to them as POTUS, so I'm assuming you meant they are elected and did something equal or worst than Clinton did as POTUS.
Click to expand...

Looks like you are looking for excuses to give them a break.:laugh2:

That is not what Jiro asked. He asked if as elected public officials, they should have their wrongdoings ignored.

Yes or no.
 
jillio said:
I started the thread. Troll my thread and I will report you for such. Very simple.
Click to expand...

Comical
You have 100% no right to tell anyone they can or can't come into a thread, trust me on that. Would you do the same to others who have came here far more than I?

I nor anyone else can't stop you from going to the MODS, go ahead if you wish.
 
rolling7 said:
Comical
You have 100% no right to tell anyone they can or can't come into a thread, trust me on that. Would you do the same to others who have came here far more than I?

I nor anyone else can't stop you from going to the MODS, go ahead if you wish.
Click to expand...

I can certainly report you for trolling. In fact, I just have. You are off topic and being argumentative for no reason other than you have some personal grudge to play out.
 
jillio said:
Looks like you are looking for excuses to give them a break.:laugh2:

That is not what Jiro asked. He asked if as elected public officials, they should have their wrongdoings ignored.

Yes or no.
Click to expand...

First you need to get some of Jiro's special glasses.
Then re-read post#660....the words "elected public officials" ain't there!

The answer is NO, but then they did ignore JFK's and Clinton's
by they I mean MM
 
rolling7 said:
First you need to get some of Jiro's special glasses.
Then re-read post#660....the words "elected public officials" ain't there!

The answer is NO, but then they did ignore JFK's and Clinton's
by they I mean MM
Click to expand...

This thread is not about JFK or Clinton. Funny that the only examples you can come up with are Democratic Presidents.

Run through a quick list of all the Repubs in politics that have been caught with their pants down, and your argument might start to have a little validity to it. As it stands, you simply look like a sore looser.
 
jillio said:
I can certainly report you for trolling. In fact, I just have. You are off topic and being argumentative for no reason other than you have some personal grudge to play out.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is off topic but I did not take us off topic. That happen long before me.
I posted replies in relationship to posting that others put up and gave my opinion.
Something you yourself do often, are you going to find yourself guilty of trolling.

hint: this post is off topic BUT it is in respond to yours.
 
rolling7 said:
Yes, it is off topic but I did not take us off topic. That happen long before me.
I posted replies in relationship to posting that others put up and gave my opinion.
Something you yourself do often, are you going to find yourself guilty of trolling.

hint: this post is off topic BUT it is in respond to yours.
Click to expand...

Keep it up.
 
Note to all ADers.
Put a question to me in topic or off topic and I'll answer it when I read it.
 
rolling7 said:
Your original post referred to them as POTUS, so I'm assuming you meant they are elected and did something equal or worst than Clinton did as POTUS.
Click to expand...

equal or worst?

Does it have to be something equal or worse to what Clinton did to make you lose respect for them?
 
rolling7 said:
First you need to get some of Jiro's special glasses.
Then re-read post#660....the words "elected public officials" ain't there!

The answer is NO, but then they did ignore JFK's and Clinton's
by they I mean MM
Click to expand...

do we have to spell it out for you?
 
since we've got President and Presidential candidates who can't keep their snakes in their pants and their hands to themselves.... how about this?

391216_256544634398082_213483202037559_863309_1040145746_n.jpg
 
Someone mentioned Coretta Scott King just endorsed Cain. I can't verify it ...
 
Cheetah said:
Do you agree that the allegations against Cain are troubling and worthy of investigating?
Click to expand...

At least one allegation was already investigated and found to have no merit ..... Nearly 15 years ago.
 
Herman Cain flatly denies the most serious allegation facing him – that he made an unwanted sexual advance toward a female employee at a work event – but POLITICO has learned new details making clear there were urgent discussions of the woman’s accusations at top levels of the National Restaurant Association within hours of when the incident was alleged to have occurred.

The new details—which come from multiple sources independently familiar with the incident at a hotel during a restaurant association event in the late 1990s—put the woman’s account even more sharply at odds with Cain’s emphatic insistence in news media interviews this week that nothing inappropriate happened between the two.


Read more: Herman Cain allegation: Sources reveal new details - Kenneth P. Vogel and Maggie Haberman and Alexander Burns - POLITICO.com
 
Analysis: Herman Cain has violated a cardinal campaign rule: If there is nothing to hide, don’t behave like there is

Read more: Analysis: Herman Cain has violated a cardinal campaign rule: If there is nothing to hide, don

Cain's attacks are just giving the story "new life": There is no "grand conspiracy" against Cain, says Andrew Sullivan at The Daily Beast. The only thing these women have in common is that they were "all grossed out by Herman Cain." By claiming the women are out to get him, Cain is only forcing them to "respond to being called liars." So instead of putting the matter behind him, "Cain has just given this story major new life."

And the lies from Team Cain are way over the line: This spectacle would be "pretty funny if it weren't so entirely pathetic," says Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway. Consider Mark Block's performance on Fox News. "The guy who is supposedly running the campaign of a Republican frontrunner has gone on television on multiple occasions and blatantly lied." Cain should fire Block immediately. "That this is the kind of person Herman Cain would hire" in the first place "speaks volumes" about the candidate. And the fact that Cain is still leading in the polls "speaks volumes about Republican voters in 2011."

http://news.yahoo.com/herman-cain-survive-attacking-accusers-092900472.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top