Another, "I didn't do it!"

[Banjo]

I don't know. Let me check.

Just asking since I thought it was odd that you brought up the Koch Brothers after I just had read an e-mail about them a few minutes ago. Just forwarded you the e-mail in case you may be interested.

 

[sallylou]

If we discuss every politician who can't keep his weinie in his pants without regard to party affiliation, we'd be here a long time. I just assume that guys are perverts until proven otherwise. It saves me time and keeps me safe.

 

[jillio]

Umm, we haven't really heard much from the women yet. Hopefully they will have their joint press conference and we can learn more about their claims.

Yes, it is evident that some of you want all the gory details. Vicarious living.

 

[TXgolfer]

Where did I say that all 5 filed formal complaints? You are confused.

Meh, It happens

This was a strangely worded sentence

In order to believe that Cain is telling the truth, one has to believe that all 5 of these women, beginning in the late 90's with the formally filed complaints, are lying.

You have still not shown a "formally filed complaint" though. You also suggested there were "formal charges" but no proof of that either.

 

[TXgolfer]

If we discuss every politician who can't keep his weinie in his pants without regard to party affiliation, we'd be here a long time. I just assume that guys are perverts until proven otherwise. It saves me time and keeps me safe.

Interesting

 

[jillio]

Meh, It happens

This was a strangely worded sentence



You have still not shown a "formally filed complaint" though. You also suggested there were "formal charges" but no proof of that either.

Simple English. Beginning in 1990's with the formally filed complaints. The NRA has already admitted that the complaints were filed. In fact, Cain has even admitted the complaints were filed. And yet, you are still asking for proof. Pretty obvious what your motive is.

 

[TXgolfer]

Yes, it is evident that some of you want all the gory details. Vicarious living.

How rude. Some of us would just like proof before we condemn someone for their actions.

 

[jillio]

Just asking since I thought it was odd that you brought up the Koch Brothers after I just had read an e-mail about them a few minutes ago. Just forwarded you the e-mail in case you may be interested.

Cool. No, I just posted that excerpt to show that Cain has more issues than sexual harrassment to worry about. Looks like his boat has sprung a serious leak.

LOL, I guess great minds....you know the rest!:P

BTW, signed the petition. Looks like Cain's "brothers from another mother" are sleaze balls, too.

 

[jillio]

How rude. Some of us would just like proof before we condemn someone for their actions.

Right.:roll:

 

[TXgolfer]

Simple English. Beginning in 1990's with the formally filed complaints. The NRA has already admitted that the complaints were filed. In fact, Cain has even admitted the complaints were filed. And yet, you are still asking for proof. Pretty obvious what your motive is.

I have no motive It would be interesting to hear the women's version.

 

[jillio]

Bennett told reporters Friday that because multiple women have made accusations against Cain that there must be some truth to the allegations.

"There's an expression: where there's smoke, there's fire,” Bennett said. “The fact that there are multiple complaints tells me that it is more likely than not that there was some sexual harassment activity by this man at that time… the fact that there's more than one complaint is meaningful."

Bennett called Cain’s claims that the resolution was a severance agreement and not a legal settlement an “inaccurate description of the settlement agreement."

"This was a settlement of an internal complaint of sexual harassment,” Bennett said. “It was not a severance agreement."

Bennett also said there had been “more than one” incident of sexual harassment involving his client, and that Cain was made aware of all the incidents in the internal complaint filed in 1999.

"Mr. Cain knows the specific incidents that were alleged,” Bennett said. “My client filed a written complaint in 1999 against him specifically, and it had very specific incidents in it, and if he chooses to not remember or not acknowledge those that's his issue."

First Read - Restaurant group acknowledges settlement with Cain accuser

 

[jillio]

I have no motive It would be interesting to hear the women's version.

Yeah. I bet you would find it very interesting.

 

[Bottesini]

Yeah. I bet you would find it very interesting.

Usually one would expect to see some documentation. I am not interested in politics, or the shenanigans of politicos, but it seems a little unreasonable just to assume the man is guilty because someone accused him..

 

[jillio]

Usually one would expect to see some documentation. I am not interested in politics, or the shenanigans of politicos, but it seems a little unreasonable just to assume the man is guilty because someone accused him..

The documentation has been shown to attorneys. Everything has been confirmed. There is no need to release it to the general public. That is like asking a woman's sexual assault report to be printed in the local paper.

Five someones have accused him, two of which filed formal complaints many years prior to his even thinking about the Repub nomination.

 

[TXgolfer]

Bennett told reporters Friday that because multiple women have made accusations against Cain that there must be some truth to the allegations.

"There's an expression: where there's smoke, there's fire,” Bennett said. “The fact that there are multiple complaints tells me that it is more likely than not that there was some sexual harassment activity by this man at that time… the fact that there's more than one complaint is meaningful."

Bennett called Cain’s claims that the resolution was a severance agreement and not a legal settlement an “inaccurate description of the settlement agreement."

"This was a settlement of an internal complaint of sexual harassment,” Bennett said. “It was not a severance agreement."

Bennett also said there had been “more than one” incident of sexual harassment involving his client, and that Cain was made aware of all the incidents in the internal complaint filed in 1999.

"Mr. Cain knows the specific incidents that were alleged,” Bennett said. “My client filed a written complaint in 1999 against him specifically, and it had very specific incidents in it, and if he chooses to not remember or not acknowledge those that's his issue."

First Read - Restaurant group acknowledges settlement with Cain accuser

Somewhat more credible since this man can most likely be disbarred for lying.... But it's still just an allegation. Perhaps he will provide evidence later.

He also states that it was an internal complaint so no "formal charges" as you stated earlier in this thread.....In this case at least

 

[Steinhauer]

Usually one would expect to see some documentation. I am not interested in politics, or the shenanigans of politicos, but it seems a little unreasonable just to assume the man is guilty because someone accused him..

That is exactly what I have been saying - but you, of all people, got it down to a simple sentence.

 

[Steinhauer]

Somewhat more credible since this man can most likely be disbarred for lying.... But it's still just an allegation. Perhaps he will provide evidence later.

He also states that it was an internal complaint so no "formal charges" as you stated earlier in this thread.....In this case at least

Actually, if the attorney is representing what his client's views are, he cannot get disbarred for lying.

and ... attorneys have a reputation for .... lying. Not all of course ...

And to be very frank, open and honest - whether it was a "settlement" or a "severance" is not defined by his client. It is defined by the National Restaurant Association. If there was actually a court case with a file number and the case was settled instead of going to court, then it would be considered a settlement.

 

[jillio]

Somewhat more credible since this man can most likely be disbarred for lying.... But it's still just an allegation. Perhaps he will provide evidence later.

He also states that it was an internal complaint so no "formal charges" as you stated earlier in this thread.....In this case at least

What more evidence do you want? The details of what Cain actually did to get a complaint filed against him? The reports have been viewed by lawyers. There was more than one incident reported in the complaint. A second womal filed a formal complaint. Three more have reported being sexually harrassed by Cain. One gave the details.

I said, "formal complaint" not "formal charges". The woman was following company policy for filing a complaint for sexual harrassment. That is what is supposed to be done. The woman followed protocol.

 

[jillio]

Actually, if the attorney is representing what his client's views are, he cannot get disbarred for lying.

and ... attorneys have a reputation for .... lying. Not all of course ...

Did you read what the attorney said? He wasn't speaking in regard to his client's views. He was talking about the formal complaint that he has seen.

 

[TXgolfer]

What more evidence do you want? The details of what Cain actually did to get a complaint filed against him? The reports have been viewed by lawyers. There was more than one incident reported in the complaint. A second womal filed a formal complaint. Three more have reported being sexually harrassed by Cain. One gave the details.

I said, "formal complaint" not "formal charges". The woman was following company policy for filing a complaint for sexual harrassment. That is what is supposed to be done. The woman followed protocol.

Post 370

He knows who is accusers are. He knew who they were when the formal charges were filed. He just conveniently "forgot". Then, he slowly started regaining some "vague" memories. Seriously, this guy must have some serious cognitive issues. Definately not a good thing in a Presidential candidate.