And we worry about international terrorists

Status
Not open for further replies.
rockin'robin said:
Yes, I believe I did....And in Georgia, of all states!....And the men were elderly, 60s-70s.....Guessing those "rednecks" are going high-tech! :giggle:

Anyhow, yes, it's to be taken seriously....and not forgeting that supposingly Anthrax threat letter I received in the mail last year. There are some really sick puppies out there.
Click to expand...

Rednecks is a derogatory slang term , I see nothing funny about using derogatory slang terms about about race.
 
whatdidyousay! said:
Rednecks is a derogatory slang term , I see nothing funny about using derogatory slang terms about about race.
Click to expand...
In my area, redneck is not a derogatory slang term about race. Rednecks are proud of themselves.

What these four men in Georgia are accused of doing does not qualify them as rednecks.
 
Reba said:
In my area, redneck is not a derogatory slang term about race. Rednecks are proud of themselves.

What these four men in Georgia are accused of doing does not qualify them as rednecks.
Click to expand...

It is a derogatory slang term where I live. I guess it depend in what neck of the woods you live in!
 
whatdidyousay! said:
Rednecks is a derogatory slang term , I see nothing funny about using derogatory slang terms about about race.
Click to expand...

You really need to "chill" WDYS....would it make you feel better if I said "Those Georgia Peaches are a little Rotten"?....
 
Jiro said:
you don't need CCW to carry out military-like attack on federal buildings. It's not exactly quite easy to conceal assault rifles, dontchathink?

again - CCW permit is for law-abiding citizens, not criminals. They are criminals. We are not. Please try not to confuse armed law-abiding citizens with criminals like them.
Click to expand...

So now one who has a CCW has ever committed a criminal act?:laugh2:
 
Reba said:
Yeah, maybe it would be more relevant to ask if the Georgia guys had drivers' licenses rather than CCW permits.
Click to expand...

Maybe, maybe not. No one should be afraid of disclosing either bit of information.
 
Here you go again, Jiro. Stick with what is written, instead of what you want it to say.
 
jillio said:
Maybe, maybe not. Don't see any reason why it should be kept a secret, though.
Click to expand...

Secret? Well let's put this way- either you can prove it or you can't. And if you can't, I'd say this is a rather offensive and extremely poor taste.
 
jillio said:
Here you go again, Jiro. Stick with what is written, instead of what you want it to say.
Click to expand...

Huh? They were killed by truck bomb. That is a fact. Are you saying otherwise? Were anybody else killed by their concealed weapon? Why are you associating armed law-abiding citizens with the like of these senseless terrorists?
 
Jiro said:
Secret? Well let's put this way- either you can prove it or you can't. And if you can't, I'd say this is a rather offensive and extremely poor taste.
Click to expand...

Of course you do.:laugh2:
 
Jiro said:
Huh? They were killed by truck bomb. That is a fact. Are you saying otherwise? Were anybody else killed by their concealed weapon? Why are you associating armed law-abiding citizens with the like of these senseless terrorists?
Click to expand...

That has virtually nothing to do with the post I was responding to. Where did the truck bomb come from?

Like I said, here we go again.:zzz: You would be interesting to debate with if you could manage to stick to logical progression.
 
jillio said:
That has virtually nothing to do with the post I was responding to. Where did the truck bomb come from?

Like I said, here we go again.:zzz: You would be interesting to debate with if you could manage to stick to logical progression.
Click to expand...

Wow.... I don't know where to begin. Irrational reasoning. Combative behavior. Intellectual dishonesty. Insulting people.

How am I supposed to have a logical discussion with you when you're attempting to tie CCW with building and driving truck bomb. And I thought 9/11 conspiracy talk was bad enough.
 
Jiro said:
Wow.... I don't know where to begin. Irrational reasoning. Combative behavior. Intellectual dishonesty. Insulting people.

How am I supposed to have a logical discussion with you if you're attempting to tie CCW with building and driving truck bomb. And I thought 9/11 conspiracy talk was bad enough.
Click to expand...

By answering simple questions as asked instead of dragging in thousands of strawmen.:dunno2: Easy really.
 
jillio said:
By answering simple questions as asked instead of dragging in thousands of strawmen.:dunno2: Easy really.
Click to expand...

Oh? You concocting CCW theory is not you making strawmen? And I asked you simple questions too such as:

Did they need CCW to rent a truck? To drive a truck to federal building? To obtain bomb materials? To kill people?

And are you linking people with CCW with tendency to commit domestic terrorism?
 
Jiro said:
Oh? You concocting CCW theory is not you making strawmen? And I asked you simple questions too such as:

Did they need CCW to rent a truck? To drive a truck to federal building? To obtain bomb materials? To kill people?

And are you linking people with CCW with tendency to commit domestic terrorism?
Click to expand...

Go back to the first question asked: were they CCW holders?

All of the following questions you are repeating were attempts to deflect and not answer the original question. Strawmen.;)

More of the same old, same old.
 
jillio said:
Go back to the first question asked: were they CCW holders?

All of the following questions you are repeating were attempts to deflect and not answer the original question. Strawmen.;)

More of the same old, same old.
Click to expand...

the answer is I don't know and I doubt it.

would it be possible if you can tone down your insulting behavior? it's tiresome and one step away from report button. you're insulting people left and right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top