Only 55 percent of young Americans have jobs, lowest since WWII

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,430
Reaction score
551
Unemployment among young adults is at its highest point since World War II, new data show. And it's having a disconcerting impact on the trajectory of their careers and lives.

"We have a monster jobs problem, and young people are the biggest losers," Andrew Sum, an economist with the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University told the Associated Press.

Just 55.3 percent of people between 16 and 29 were employed in 2010 on average, the according to new figures released by the Census Bureau. That represents an enormous drop from 67.3 percent in 2000. Among teens the figure was less than 30 percent.

The result? Young people are delaying taking the steps that traditionally represent movement into adult life: moving to a new place, getting married, and buying a new home. Just 4.4 percent of 18- to 34-year olds moved across state lines -- again, the lowest level since World War Two (though such moves have been declining since long before the recent downturn, it's worth noting). Roughly 5.9 million Americans between 25 and 34 lived with their parents. That's up by 25 percent since before the recession began in late 2007. (Men are nearly twice as likely as women to move back in with Mom and Dad.) The marriage rate for those between 25 and 34 fell to 44.2 percent, also a new low. And home ownership declined for the fourth straight year.

"Many young adults are essentially postponing adulthood and all of the family responsibilities and extra costs that go along with it," Mark Mather of the Population Reference Bureau told the AP. If that continues, it would make the U.S. more like Europe, where youth unemployment is far higher and many people continue to live with their parents into their 30s.

In addition, studies have shown that when people experience unemployment at a young age, it depresses their likely earning power over the course of their entire career. "These people will be scarred, and they will be called the 'lost generation' - in that their careers would not be the same way if we had avoided this economic disaster," Richard Freeman, an economist at Harvard, said.

Only 55 percent of young Americans have jobs, lowest since WWII | The Lookout - Yahoo! News
 
• lacking employe-search online
• selfish for not move to the region where have high-demand job
• spend too much at online
 
it took me 6 months of constant searching to get a job and one of my friends over a year. There are too many bodies for jobs and people do not want to hire people with no experience.

They hire the older more experienced people and the less experienced people get left behind growing older without the opportunity to gain experience because honestly

why would you hire a 25 year old with no experience if there is a 40 year old with years of experience wanting the same job.

I could not move out of my parents place until after I had a job because I did not have the finances to do so.
I can not support kids until I have a better job so, am I avoiding the family responsibilities out of selfishness so common sense? Why would I have a kid if it means we'll be living in a cardboard box?

We honestly have to wait until the bodies begin to move out of the job market before I can have kids or buy a house.
 
Very sad...my 20 yr. old can only find a part time job, not enough to support himself....My other son, soon as he graduates, hopes to join the Navy.
 
Yeah, but how many in that age group are full time students? Not enough information here, and what is here is skewed.
 
Anybody remember the prediction that there wouldn't be enough employees available for all the jobs open because of retiring baby boomers?

Well, so much for that prediction.
 
Unemployment among young adults is at its highest point since World War II, new data show. And it's having a disconcerting impact on the trajectory of their careers and lives.

"We have a monster jobs problem, and young people are the biggest losers," Andrew Sum, an economist with the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University told the Associated Press.

Just 55.3 percent of people between 16 and 29 were employed in 2010 on average, the according to new figures released by the Census Bureau. That represents an enormous drop from 67.3 percent in 2000. Among teens the figure was less than 30 percent.

The result? Young people are delaying taking the steps that traditionally represent movement into adult life: moving to a new place, getting married, and buying a new home. Just 4.4 percent of 18- to 34-year olds moved across state lines -- again, the lowest level since World War Two (though such moves have been declining since long before the recent downturn, it's worth noting). Roughly 5.9 million Americans between 25 and 34 lived with their parents. That's up by 25 percent since before the recession began in late 2007. (Men are nearly twice as likely as women to move back in with Mom and Dad.) The marriage rate for those between 25 and 34 fell to 44.2 percent, also a new low. And home ownership declined for the fourth straight year.

"Many young adults are essentially postponing adulthood and all of the family responsibilities and extra costs that go along with it," Mark Mather of the Population Reference Bureau told the AP. If that continues, it would make the U.S. more like Europe, where youth unemployment is far higher and many people continue to live with their parents into their 30s.

In addition, studies have shown that when people experience unemployment at a young age, it depresses their likely earning power over the course of their entire career. "These people will be scarred, and they will be called the 'lost generation' - in that their careers would not be the same way if we had avoided this economic disaster," Richard Freeman, an economist at Harvard, said.

Only 55 percent of young Americans have jobs, lowest since WWII | The Lookout - Yahoo! News

broken link I saw it that is sad suffer
 
Anybody remember the prediction that there wouldn't be enough employees available for all the jobs open because of retiring baby boomers?

Well, so much for that prediction.
The Boomers haven't all retired yet. :giggle:

Seriously, the next generation has to have the right skills and work ethics in order to fill the shoes of the retirees.
 
The Boomers haven't all retired yet. :giggle:

Seriously, the next generation has to have the right skills and work ethics in order to fill the shoes of the retirees.

Well, I am finally on my way to build up skills of being paperpusher. :giggle:
 
The Boomers haven't all retired yet. :giggle:

Seriously, the next generation has to have the right skills and work ethics in order to fill the shoes of the retirees.

Work ethics is a big issue in this age of entitlement.
 
This sucks...especially since I fall into the category of wanting a job, but unable to get one due to lack of experience. It's not a matter of not looking, either.

This is really sad that the economy's gone this far down the drain.
 
This sucks...especially since I fall into the category of wanting a job, but unable to get one due to lack of experience. It's not a matter of not looking, either.

This is really sad that the economy's gone this far down the drain.

The economy can't be used as a scapegoat. It has an impact, to be certain, but it is not the whole story.
 
Wirelessly posted (droid)

According to the current fiancial news, average of 4 people for each job opening. It's brutal out there. Some employers refuse to even interview people who are currently unemployed. If you look in the listings, some of them specifically say this.
The hardest hit are the young and older workers (50+).
Older people always complain about the younger generation. You hear complaints but no one ever recognizes the good kids. My teen is a great kid. He's kind. He's earned college credit while in highschool. And I can introduce you to a lot of kids like him.
 
This sucks...especially since I fall into the category of wanting a job, but unable to get one due to lack of experience. It's not a matter of not looking, either.

This is really sad that the economy's gone this far down the drain.

Start volunteering in the field u would like to work in the future. It is a great way to get experience and gain the skills u need for the career you want. Plus you will be contributing to the community. Everyone is a winner.
 
Start volunteering in the field u would like to work in the future. It is a great way to get experience and gain the skills u need for the career you want. Plus you will be contributing to the community. Everyone is a winner.

I'm going into interpreting, and as I have no skills as of yet that's hardly an option. If I could, I would, but it's not possible right now. That, and any volunteering would have to be a short gig, because with recent events my family's unable to keep up with the bills. I need to be working in a job.

@ Jillio- I understand that the economy is not a scapegoat, but I've filled out over 100 job applications and sent out loads of resumes as well. I'm not expecting to be handed a job, but at the same time all the letters I get returned say that I don't have enough experience to be considered as a candidate. I haven't been able to volunteer due to a tremendous increase in responsibilities at home. Basically, if I ignore those responsibilities I need to be making money.
 
Start volunteering in the field u would like to work in the future. It is a great way to get experience and gain the skills u need for the career you want. Plus you will be contributing to the community. Everyone is a winner.

Yep, plus it will look good on the resume.
 
I'm going into interpreting, and as I have no skills as of yet that's hardly an option. If I could, I would, but it's not possible right now. That, and any volunteering would have to be a short gig, because with recent events my family's unable to keep up with the bills. I need to be working in a job.

@ Jillio- I understand that the economy is not a scapegoat, but I've filled out over 100 job applications and sent out loads of resumes as well. I'm not expecting to be handed a job, but at the same time all the letters I get returned say that I don't have enough experience to be considered as a candidate. I haven't been able to volunteer due to a tremendous increase in responsibilities at home. Basically, if I ignore those responsibilities I need to be making money.

The question I have is what jobs are you turning in applictions for? I am not saying that you didn't apply at these places that I'm gonna ask about. However could it be possible you are aiming high? Not applying at starting jobs like Mcdonalds or etc doing dish washing and then build from there?

My first job was dishwashing. I hated it but had to start somewhere. I've been wanting an office job pushing paper for a while due to me getting older and thinking of future and what I might or might not able to do.. I just finally got that job I've been wanting after working for 20 years sometimes doing jobs I hated.
 
The economy can't be used as a scapegoat. It has an impact, to be certain, but it is not the whole story.

we should be leery of big businesses and politicians using economy as an ecuse....im sick of it honesty i mean im sick of thei dishonesty
 
The question I have is what jobs are you turning in applictions for? I am not saying that you didn't apply at these places that I'm gonna ask about. However could it be possible you are aiming high? Not applying at starting jobs like Mcdonalds or etc doing dish washing and then build from there?

My first job was dishwashing. I hated it but had to start somewhere. I've been wanting an office job pushing paper for a while due to me getting older and thinking of future and what I might or might not able to do.. I just finally got that job I've been wanting after working for 20 years sometimes doing jobs I hated.

I haven't been applying for fast food that often, but that's more because I'm a sucker for it and I'm really trying to get my health on track and lose weight. I have applied mostly to retail and stuff, whatever entry-level stuff I could find.
 
I haven't been applying for fast food that often, but that's more because I'm a sucker for it and I'm really trying to get my health on track and lose weight. I have applied mostly to retail and stuff, whatever entry-level stuff I could find.

Have you checked out positions available at your school's work study program? They always have student positions available. Granted, they don't pay much, but they do provide experience and look good on a resume.
 
Back
Top