rockin'robin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
- Messages
- 24,425
- Reaction score
- 551
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former presidential candidate John Edwards was indicted by a federal grand jury following an investigation into money used to cover up an extramarital affair, a source with knowledge of the investigation told CNN.
A grand jury had been investigating that money given to support Edwards' mistress Rielle Hunter by benefactors of Edwards should have been considered campaign donations -- a contention Edwards' team has disputed.
Edwards does not want to plead guilty to a felony because he could lose his law license, a source familiar with the inquiry previously told CNN.
The case involves the financial aid given to Edwards' mistress, Rielle Hunter. During their affair, Hunter became pregnant with Edwards' baby, though at first he denied he was the father.
While prosecutors believe the monetary help given to Hunter by two of Edwards' political backers should have been considered campaign donations, Edwards' attorneys disagree.
Edwards' attorney Greg Craig has said his client "has done wrong in his life -- and he knows it better than anyone -- but he did not break the law." He said the government's theory of the case "is wrong on the facts and wrong on the law."
The government is believed to be building its case that Edwards violated campaign finance law on an 11-year-old advisory opinion issued by the Federal Election Commission, which asserted that a gift to a candidate for federal office would be considered a campaign contribution, a source with knowledge of the inquiry told CNN this week.
The decision, dated June 14, 2000, is known as "Harvey." It's named after a man named Phillip Harvey who sought guidance from the FEC because he wanted to give money to someone who was preparing to run for federal office, but didn't want the money to be used for campaign purposes.
The opinion is important because Hunter received more than $1 million from two contributors -- 100-year-old philanthropist Rachel "Bunny" Mellon of Virginia and attorney Fred Baron, who has since died.
Edwards' attorneys have said that the money was not and should not be considered political contributions. If it wasn't a political contribution, what was it? The most widely reported theory -- which the Edwards team has publicly neither confirmed nor denied -- is that the money was given to keep Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, from finding out about his mistress and child.
The source with knowledge of the inner workings of the case and other legal observers have noted that the advisory opinion is shaky ground to base a federal prosecution on because it is not a black-letter federal statute, and apparently has not been cited in any important case law, or as legal authority behind any important court decisions.
Federal prosecutors in North Carolina have declined to comment on the case because it is a matter relating to a grand jury.
Other experts have said the Justice Department would have a strong case in court if it could prove Edwards knew about the funds and what they were being used for - a contention he has denied.
John Edwards Indicted - Jacksonville News Story - WJXT Jacksonville
A grand jury had been investigating that money given to support Edwards' mistress Rielle Hunter by benefactors of Edwards should have been considered campaign donations -- a contention Edwards' team has disputed.
Edwards does not want to plead guilty to a felony because he could lose his law license, a source familiar with the inquiry previously told CNN.
The case involves the financial aid given to Edwards' mistress, Rielle Hunter. During their affair, Hunter became pregnant with Edwards' baby, though at first he denied he was the father.
While prosecutors believe the monetary help given to Hunter by two of Edwards' political backers should have been considered campaign donations, Edwards' attorneys disagree.
Edwards' attorney Greg Craig has said his client "has done wrong in his life -- and he knows it better than anyone -- but he did not break the law." He said the government's theory of the case "is wrong on the facts and wrong on the law."
The government is believed to be building its case that Edwards violated campaign finance law on an 11-year-old advisory opinion issued by the Federal Election Commission, which asserted that a gift to a candidate for federal office would be considered a campaign contribution, a source with knowledge of the inquiry told CNN this week.
The decision, dated June 14, 2000, is known as "Harvey." It's named after a man named Phillip Harvey who sought guidance from the FEC because he wanted to give money to someone who was preparing to run for federal office, but didn't want the money to be used for campaign purposes.
The opinion is important because Hunter received more than $1 million from two contributors -- 100-year-old philanthropist Rachel "Bunny" Mellon of Virginia and attorney Fred Baron, who has since died.
Edwards' attorneys have said that the money was not and should not be considered political contributions. If it wasn't a political contribution, what was it? The most widely reported theory -- which the Edwards team has publicly neither confirmed nor denied -- is that the money was given to keep Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, from finding out about his mistress and child.
The source with knowledge of the inner workings of the case and other legal observers have noted that the advisory opinion is shaky ground to base a federal prosecution on because it is not a black-letter federal statute, and apparently has not been cited in any important case law, or as legal authority behind any important court decisions.
Federal prosecutors in North Carolina have declined to comment on the case because it is a matter relating to a grand jury.
Other experts have said the Justice Department would have a strong case in court if it could prove Edwards knew about the funds and what they were being used for - a contention he has denied.
John Edwards Indicted - Jacksonville News Story - WJXT Jacksonville
