Glenn
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,908
- Reaction score
- 0
Hammer meets nail straight on!Perhaps she should have behaved in a way that would have precluded investigations and lawsuits.![]()

Hammer meets nail straight on!Perhaps she should have behaved in a way that would have precluded investigations and lawsuits.![]()

Those frivolous lawsuits get pretty expensive real quick. Kind of like being Gulliver tied down by so many Lilliputians, one cannot do its job effectively with all the investigation and lawsuits going on.
I think I am going to invest money in companies that manufacture black helicopters. And tinfoil hats. Diversify my investment portfolio ya know...![]()

Hence the word, "frivolous" lawsuits and other "legal stuff" which ought to tell a lot about the people doing the filings and ulterior motives for doing so.

Yeah, this crap all came up the day that he released it. Conclusion (by all those who are even vaguely intelligent): It was scanned in using software that created optimized PDFs, which is what creates the multiple layers and many of the effects mentioned here.
But you can just ignore that, I'm sure.
He's just rehashing an argument from the day that it was released. Nothing new to see here.
It was soooo predictable.It costs money just to file paperwork. It costs money to have people served.Hence the word, "frivolous" lawsuits and other "legal stuff" which ought to tell a lot about the people doing the filings and ulterior motives for doing so.
It costs money just to file paperwork. It costs money to have people served.
"Legal stuff" is such an exacting term. :roll:Is that a quote from Palin?![]()
It's an imperfect system, but what are the alternatives?Yes, and yet the frivolousness of it all is quite telling of the people doing the filing and charges. Doesn't cost them money to levy those charges.
It's an imperfect system, but what are the alternatives?
This is just incredible. The article exploits people's ignorance about JPEG algorithms and how they determine which data to discard and which to preserve to make a case that it's forged. Since it was saved as PDF, there's extensive amount of JPG compression going on and halo effect is a common side effect of jpeg compression. A lot of his "proofs" are pure bogus.
This one refutes nicely:
Reply to Douglas Vogt (Updated) | Obama Conspiracy Theories
Dougls Vogt is one of the crackpots working as a geologist - hardly an expert in OCR.
Reality Revealed, The Theory of Multidimensional Reality by Douglas Vogt
In civil cases, the loser pays the winner's court costs. That can add up to a lot of money. That is deterrent right there.Perhaps tack on a hefty fine for filing a frivolous charge as deemed by a judge for wasting everybody's time and money? And if there's a pattern, perhaps add criminal charges for repeated abuse of the system?
Again?Yup, that's great about Obama's birth certificate isn't forgery at all.
Now, this thread is moot and both of Yizuman and kokonut got owned.![]()
In civil cases, the loser pays the winner's court costs. That can add up to a lot of money. That is deterrent right there.
Got to file it before you get it in front of a judge. Federal court fees $300 or more the last time I looked.I'm talking about when a judge deems a suit frivolous and tosses it out before it begins.
Again?