JoeyDeafNinja
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 1,332
- Reaction score
- 2
I read somewhere that they are coming out with waterproof cis. since you said yours broke, would you be interested in looking into the waterproof one?
I read somewhere that they are coming out with waterproof cis. since you said yours broke, would you be interested in looking into the waterproof one?
I'm not even a candidate for CI. The bone of my cochlea is eroding away. You can't put an implant in bone that's eroding away. I'm glad that I can tell hearing people "not a candidate" and be done with any discussion about CI.

Bottesini, I'm not surprised. haha
I understand that as the years go by it is easier and easier to not have to join the hearing world. I just wanted to know if you felt that cis are threatening your community.
I don’t think that Deaf people should join the hearing world, but that the two should overlap. Many hearing people just think that we need to "fix" deaf people. Except for in my ASL class, everyone is so ignorant. No one knows anything about Deaf culture, and that is a double standard brought on by ignorant people which is wrong.
Let's say a couple has a child and the child ends up being deaf. Would you still be upset if they gave the kid a ci and also taught them sign language and became part of the Deaf community?
I don't think they overlap well because it isn't a two way street. The hearing world expects deaf people to do all the work.
Depends on how old is that child and do their parent allow them to make a choice?
But to young children don't understand risks of CI. They likely will die if their parents aren't watching their children
I read somewhere that they are coming out with waterproof cis. since you said yours broke, would you be interested in looking into the waterproof one?
Under what circumstances?
You do realize that implants have nothing to do with waterprood right? Its the processors that the companies make that can be waterproof
No. They get the implant at six months (that's the earliest you get it, right?)
How can baby understand what CI is? Sorry but I still find it wrong.
electricution.
Hi! My 2 cents: I think the decision to get a CI is separate from the decision to pursue ASL. CIs are tools that provides access to sound and don't come programmed with language. They are not mutually exclusive, either /or situations. Many, many children with CIs also use sign language, it's just that most use spoken language as their primary language because it is easier for them to acquire in everyday life ( most don't have access to an ASL-immersive environment in which to learn, as they do for spoken languages) and the populations in which they live most often use spoken languages.How do you feel about cochlear implants? Do you feel that they will make sign language obsolete?
Ok, that's silly. You know what the odds would be? Post your stats here in regards to that before you go any further, please.
This is a DEAF forum where many people have CIs, HAs, etc. We're not exactly clueless here.
Bowing out of this thread now. Buh-bye.
I didn't say that. Someone else did.
Go back to the top of the page. Post #31. Yours. Please provide sources that say electrocution is a problem.
It's actually true.
I understand what you trying to say here. That's way different than CI because CI is a tool that "fix" deaf people. CI actually risk deaf people, even me. I am in greater risk of getting electriced if I'm only dumb enough to swim in while wearing CI, out in rain, and during thuderstorm if I only wearing CI. Getting a child's ear pierced is different.![]()