Polanski free, Swiss reject US extradition request

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,419
Reaction score
551
BERN, Switzerland – The Swiss government declared renowned film director Roman Polanski a free man on Monday after rejecting a U.S. request to extradite him on a charge of having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

The Swiss mostly blamed U.S. authorities for failing to provide confidential testimony about Polanski's sentencing procedure in 1977-1978.

The stunning decision could end the United States' three-decade pursuit of Polanski, unless he travels to another country that would be willing to apprehend him and weigh sending him to Los Angeles. France, where he has spent much of his time, does not extradite its own citizens, and the public scrutiny over Switzerland's deliberations may dissuade other nations from making such a spectacular arrest.

The Swiss government said it had sought confidential testimony given on Jan. 26 by Roger Gunson, the Los Angeles attorney in charge of the original prosecution against Polanski. Washington rejected the request.

"Mr. Polanski can now move freely. Since 12:30 today he's a free man," Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf declared.

Authorities in Los Angeles and Washington cannot appeal the Swiss decision. Sandy Gibbons, a spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, declined to comment.

The Oscar-winning director of "Rosemary's Baby," "Chinatown" and "The Pianist" was accused of plying his victim with champagne and part of a Quaalude during a 1977 modeling shoot and raping her. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy, but pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse.

In exchange, the judge agreed to drop the remaining charges and sentence him to prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation. However, he was released after 42 days by an evaluator who deemed him mentally sound and unlikely to offend again. The judge responded by saying he was going to send Polanski back to jail for the remainder of the 90 days and that afterward he would ask Polanski to agree to a "voluntary deportation." Polanski then fled the country on the eve of his Feb. 1, 1978, sentencing.

Based on references to Gunson's testimony in U.S. courts, the Swiss said it "should prove" that Polanski served his sentence after undergoing 42 days of diagnostic study.

"If this were the case, Roman Polanski would actually have already served his sentence and therefore both the proceedings on which the U.S. extradition request is founded and the request itself would have no foundation," the ministry said.

The Justice Ministry also said that national interests were taken into consideration in the decision, and the wishes of the victim, Samantha Geimer, who long ago publicly identified herself and has joined in Polanski's bid for dismissal.

The 76-year-old French-Polish film director Roman Polanski will not be extradited to the USA," the ministry said in a statement. "The freedom-restricting measures against him have been revoked."

Polanski's lawyer Herve Temime said the director was still at his Swiss chalet in the resort of Gstaad, where he has been held under house arrest since December.

Switzerland's top justice official said he could now leave.

Temime told The Associated Press by telephone from his office in Paris that his client was ready to enjoy his freedom.

"This decision was certainly not expected," Temime said.

He praised Swiss authorities for making the responsible decision.

Approving extradition had seemed the likeliest scenario after Polanski was arrested on Sept. 26 as he arrived in Zurich to receive a lifetime achievement award from a film festival. Polanski had also suffered a series of legal setbacks this year in California courts.

Switzerland handles about 200 extradition requests a year and only about 5 percent are rejected, Widmer-Schlumpf said.

Widmer-Schlumpf said this decision was not meant to excuse Polanski's crime, saying the issue was "not about deciding whether he is guilty or not guilty."

The government said extradition had to be rejected "considering the persisting doubts concerning the presentation of the facts of the case."

Beyond the legal confusion, Polanski's extradition is a complicated and diplomatically sensitive because of Polanski's status as a cultural icon in France and Poland, where he holds dual citizenship, and his history as a Holocaust survivor whose first wife was murdered by crazed followers of cult leader Charles Manson in California.

French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand's office expressed satisfaction with the decision, nine months after Mitterrand said Polanski had been "thrown to the lions."

Widmer-Schlumpf said she informed authorities in the United States, France and Poland, in addition to Polanski's lawyer.

She said she hoped the decision wouldn't harm relations with Washington. The two countries have bickered in recent years over wealthy Americans hiding their money in the biggest Swiss bank, UBS AG, but have cooperated well on resettling prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

"These were three completely different cases that have to be treated completely differently," Widmer-Schlump said.

Polanski free, Swiss reject US extradition request - Yahoo! News
 
Mm.. this is kind of iffy. I know Polanski, read about his history before. He has appeared in a few movies, most notably Rush Hour 3 as a recent one.

You know his wife was killed by Charles Manson and his cronies?
 
Mm.. this is kind of iffy. I know Polanski, read about his history before. He has appeared in a few movies, most notably Rush Hour 3 as a recent one.

You know his wife was killed by Charles Manson and his cronies?

Oh yeah....famous director, and the movie "Rosemary's Baby"....
but the fact was, he drugged and raped a 13 yr. old girl, then left the country....ahh....he's in his early/late 70's now....but no matter....I'm really disappointed at this turn of events, as it's been in the news, off and on, for years....
 
Yeah, I remember that from a long time go. To be frank it was in like 1977? That's 33 years ago..

I never bothered to look up the girl he raped, but I just did now after reading this article. She has actually forgave him for it. Her name is Samantha Geimer.

alg_samantha_geimer.jpg

Roman Polanski's victim Samantha Geimer, now 45, 'got over it long ago'

Roman Polanski's victim Samantha Geimer, now 45, 'got over it long ago'

BY Helen Kennedy
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Monday, September 28th 2009, 4:00 AM


Roman Polanski's most compelling defender is the woman he raped at Jack Nicholson's house when she was just 13.
Now 45, Samantha Geimer is a mother of three who lives quietly in Hawaii and works as a bookkeeper.
In January, Geimer, who publicly forgave Polanski in 1997, filed a formal request that Los Angeles prosecutors drop the charges against him.
"I have survived, indeed prevailed, against whatever harm Mr. Polanski may have caused me as a child," she said at the time. "I got over it a long time ago."
Geimer said Polanski had paid, and she wanted to move on and stop reliving the details of the assault every time he made headlines.
"True as they may be, the continued publication of those details causes harm to me, my beloved husband, my three children and my mother," she said.

In 2003, she wrote a generous Op-Ed in the Los Angeles Times, saying Polanski should not be barred from receiving a Best Director Oscar for "The Pianist."

"I don't really have any hard feelings toward him, or any sympathy, either. He is a stranger to me," she wrote.

The last time Geimer saw Polanski she was a 13-year-old aspiring model lured to a house in the Hollywood Hills for a photo shoot. Polanski plied her with champagne and a Quaalude and took nude pictures of her in a hot tub, despite her requests to go home.
She told the grand jury Polanski then had sex with her and that she was afraid to resist "much."

The director later pleaded guilty to having sex with a minor.

"What happened that night, it's hard to believe, but it paled in comparison to what happened to me in the next year of my life," she said last year, when she appeared in a documentary about problems with the case.

In the end, she was relieved when Polanski fled because reporters stopped calling.
"He did something really gross to me, but it was the media that ruined my life," she told People in 1997.
Geimer did not comment Sunday, when the events of 31 years ago resurfaced once more and reporters started knocking on her door again.

What do you guys think about it now? She's 45 years old now.. She personally forgave him 7 years ago using the mass media for her article.
 
What makes you feel that he needs to be convicted?
I am not saying what he did was right or wrong, just curious about your opinion because it doesn't tell me much about your thoughts.
 
What makes you feel that he needs to be convicted?
I am not saying what he did was right or wrong, just curious about your opinion because it doesn't tell me much about your thoughts.

You are not gonna say what he did was wrong?
 
You are not gonna say what he did was wrong?


It's not the moral issue, that obviously has no other answer, pretty simple (black and white).

It's the legal direction that I am curious about.. two different things.
 
What makes you feel that he needs to be convicted?
I am not saying what he did was right or wrong, just curious about your opinion because it doesn't tell me much about your thoughts.


He has already been convicted. Guilty Plea. Of course he didn't agree to being executed. But he should be executed.
 
It seems to be that she is actually "enjoying" being in the spotlight over this, by granting interviews and making public statements.....

I would not be surprised if Polanski didn't pay her off, as well.....

Polanski is a rapist....it's coming back to bite him in the ass, whether not in this world, but surely the next....

Sure, she can "forgive" him at 45 years old, but not at "13"...it must have been a horrific experience to her as a child!....And we do have to "forgive", in order not to carry the bitterness on our shoulders for life....but "forgetting" is another issue.....

What he should have done in the first place, and the right thing to do, was to have "served whatever time" was given to him by our courts of law...but he chose to run.

I really don't feel he should get off for something as drastic and terrible as this!...He deserves some time in prison, be fined very heavily and ordered to contribute to other rape victims.
 
Yeah, I remember that from a long time go. To be frank it was in like 1977? That's 33 years ago..

I never bothered to look up the girl he raped, but I just did now after reading this article. She has actually forgave him for it. Her name is Samantha Geimer.

What do you guys think about it now? She's 45 years old now.. She personally forgave him 7 years ago using the mass media for her article.
Whether victims forgive their rapists or not is a personal decision, not a legal one. If her decision gives her peace, that's fine for her. It's not fine for society.

Criminal charges are "The State of" or "The United States of America" versus the defendant, not "The Victim" versus the defendant.

Crimes against persons are also crimes against society, and they cannot be ignored. If rapists are allowed to be forgiven and forgotten in one case, the precedent is established for the next case.
 
...What he should have done in the first place, and the right thing to do, was to have "served whatever time" was given to him by our courts of law...but he chose to run....
Exactly. Should we say that anyone who is convicted of a crime can have their sentence overlooked if they manage to escape the country? In other words, is punishment for poor people without passports and connections only?

No.
 
Whether victims forgive their rapists or not is a personal decision, not a legal one. If her decision gives her peace, that's fine for her. It's not fine for society.

Criminal charges are "The State of" or "The United States of America" versus the defendant, not "The Victim" versus the defendant.

Crimes against persons are also crimes against society, and they cannot be ignored. If rapists are allowed to be forgiven and forgotten in one case, the precedent is established for the next case.

Exactly. I am not sure what kind of lawyer would file such a motion. The only thing she can do is refuse to testify.....and she can be charged for doing that since you agree to testify when you file the complaint.

That still wouldn't have an effect in this case because he already entered a plea.
 
Exactly. Should we say that anyone who is convicted of a crime can have their sentence overlooked if they manage to escape the country? In other words, is punishment for poor people without passports and connections only?

No.

Unfortunately that is what happened with Marc Rich.

Any bets on whether obama pardons Polanski???
 
["She added that she was confident that the American public would understand the Swiss decision."
Oh, really? That's rather presumptive. Humph!
 
I don't pardon what Polanski did on moral grounds. What's history is history.

What's going on in the court of law.. particularly for his case alone, is well over 30 years of measures.

If the US court has accepted the denied response from the Swiss authorities, is not enough to say the law is the law? They would also have no means for an appeal, documentation reveals.

As I stated right at the start in post #3.. very iffy situation.


I had read about the US response to the Swiss prior to posting.
 
Back
Top