Mexico suing AZ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want to rephrase, I criticized on GOP more than Dem because I don't agree with them but in old day, GOP was libertarian, especially conservative on fiscal issue but mixed/moderate on social issue, that which I like that and no worse as like today. Sure, Dem isn't perfect either but I agree with them so often than GOP does.

FYI, I'm proud to be voter since 2006 and vote on people that I like, not about political parties because parties can be joke.

:hmm:



:whistle:
 
Still didn't say anything about people who were "cool". And by "people that I like", he meant people whose policies he liked politically.

Yup, you are right and that what I was means.
 
continuing to read mind, I see...
 
Still didn't say anything about people who were "cool". And by "people that I like", he meant people whose policies he liked politically.

so its NOT ok to ask for clarification?
 
Sure it's okay to ask for clarification. But you inserted meaning into Foxrac's post that wasn't there.

I posed it as a question - to see if that was what he meant. Meaning, I was not sure what he was saying and wanted clarification.
 
I posed it as a question - to see if that was what he meant. Meaning, I was not sure what he was saying and wanted clarification.

You assume without asking any question at first place.

For your question, short answer is no.
 
You used wording that was not contained in his post. Eg "cool people".

so? I use wording not used in original context and pose as question to get clarification.


Its called "saying it in a different way".


example:

"I like people"

"Even bad people?"

"I never said the word 'bad' your taking my words out of context!"

"So, do you like bad people are not, because they are included in 'people'?"

"No, I do not like 'bad' people"

"thank you for clarifying that you do not like all people - which implies you only like people whom YOU think are good".
 
I asked question in the first place.

No, it wasn't valid question because you assume that I voted people that I like is about cool people. :roll:

Ask a plain question like clarification is appreciate instead assume about my personality with question.
 
No, it wasn't valid question because you assume that I voted people that I like is about cool people. :roll:

Ask a plain question like clarification is appreciate instead assume about my personality with question.

That is why I asked you for clarification. Saying "I only vote for people I like" leaves a lot of implications open.

Such as "Do you like people who do nothing about the Gulf Oil spill?"
 
That is why I asked you for clarification. Saying "I only vote for people I like" leaves a lot of implications open.

backpeddling, I see. You phrased the misleading question with intention to smear him.

Such as "Do you like people who do nothing about the Gulf Oil spill?"
but that's not what you asked but that question is still poorly constructed, poorly thought-out. You said
"so, if you think someone is "cool" you vote for them?

Its never based on policy?

I don't know why you asked such question. Foxrac's post is perfectly and clearly understood. It's so obvious - you as a voter would vote for this person because you like him/her since you share with his/her view, right?

By your logic - if you voted for this person and he's a strong Amendment 2 supporter... an opponent would say - "So do you like people who condone Wild West vigilantism and legalized murders?"
 
backpeddling, I see. You phrased the misleading question with intention to smear him.


but that's not what you asked but that question is still poorly constructed, poorly thought-out. You said

I don't know why you asked such question. Foxrac's post is perfectly and clearly understood. It's so obvious - you as a voter would vote for this person because you like him/her since you share with his/her view, right?

By your logic - if you voted for this person and he's a strong Amendment 2 supporter... an opponent would say - "So do you like people who condone Wild West vigilantism and legalized murders?"

that isn't anything at all like what I was asking - but if it makes you feel good, go ahead and make the accusation ;)

btw - I ask questions because I am NOT a mind reader. I don't make blanket accusations.
 
that isn't anything at all like what I was asking - but if it makes you feel good, go ahead and make the accusation ;)

ah... so we're in agreement that there isn't anything at all like what you thought in Foxrac's post.

:)
 
ah... so we're in agreement that there isn't anything at all like what you thought in Foxrac's post.

:)

so ... how did you make that leap of logic?


Saying "I vote for people I like" leaves a lot of implications open.

I clearly explained the reason I asked, but the reason does not satisfy you so your attempting to smear me. Your guilty of the exact same thing you just accused me of.

I could agree that your attempt to smear people by your leaps and bounds of logic is futile.
 
so ... how did you make that leap of logic?


Saying "I vote for people I like" leaves a lot of implications open.

I clearly explained the reason I asked, but the reason does not satisfy you so your attempting to smear me. Your guilty of the exact same thing you just accused me of.

I could agree that your attempt to smear people by your leaps and bounds of logic is futile.

whoa. umad?
 
I want to rephrase, I criticized on GOP more than Dem because I don't agree with them but in old day, GOP was libertarian, especially conservative on fiscal issue but mixed/moderate on social issue, that which I like that and no worse as like today. Sure, Dem isn't perfect either but I agree with them so often than GOP does.

FYI, I'm proud to be voter since 2006 and vote on people that I like, not about political parties because parties can be joke.

Now this I fully respect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top