Only in America...you must vote or else you get fined.

Status
Not open for further replies.
No point in enforcing voting if they're going to add a "none of the above" option. May as well not try to enforce it to begin with.
 
Other trolling comment. :roll:
 
If only the Liberals never voted....:roll:
 
It's a shame that more Americans don't vote but forcing them to go to the polls is not the solution.
 
Wirelessly posted (T-Mobile)

Oh no! We best flee away from America Socialism! :o
 
Last edited:
souggy said:
Wirelessly posted

Usually I see conservatives in favour of this ideas.
Click to expand...

No. Forcing people to vote under the threat of fines are not what conservatives want. Just as forcing people to buy insurance under the threat of fines and/or jail is NOT their idea of liberty. Conservatives do not believe in acts of tyranny.
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted

netrox said:
souggy said:
Wirelessly posted

Usually I see conservatives in favour of this ideas.
Click to expand...

Only if they know that the majority agrees with them.
Click to expand...

Still a violation of freedom of speech.

I know a few people that didn't vote to manipulate the systen.

Anarchists? To let the government become a dictatorship and force the people to revolt.

Liberals? To weaken Canada by making the Conservatives try to ban separatist movements like tge Bloc Quebecois, which theorically piss off the French, and restore a Liberal-majority government.

Conservatives? To weaken Canada by allowing Liberal Party win, with its corrupted party members, which theorically will piss off the people and ensure a Conservative-majority government for decades to come.

Haven't heard the reasonings behind socialists (ie. NDP) not voting.
 
netrox said:
Only if they know that the majority agrees with them.
Click to expand...

Now isn't that ironic? That statement proves that liberals have a mental problem.

"Only if they know the majority agrees with them"


The majority agreed that Obamacare is NOT what our country needed.

I will break it down for you - Senators are supposed to represent their constituents. The constituents said NO!

Democrats voted for it anyway. The "majority" said no.

So, do liberals feel that the majority no longer matters?
 
kokonut said:
No. Forcing people to vote under the threat of fines are not what conservatives want. Just as forcing people to buy insurance under the threat of fines and/or jail is NOT their idea of liberty. Conservatives do not believe in acts of tyranny.
Click to expand...

Yet conservative and Republican bloggers signify otherwise.
 
Steinhauer said:
Now isn't that ironic? That statement proves that liberals have a mental problem.

"Only if they know the majority agrees with them"


The majority agreed that Obamacare is NOT what our country needed.

I will break it down for you - Senators are supposed to represent their constituents. The constituents said NO!

Democrats voted for it anyway. The "majority" said no.

So, do liberals feel that the majority no longer matters?
Click to expand...

Quit throwing around labels.

No matter what, you have people on both side of the fence that believe that everything should be fixed by forcing people to do things. It's not a liberalism versus conservatism thing.
 
souggy said:
Quit throwing around labels.

No matter what, you have people on both side of the fence that believe that everything should be fixed by forcing people to do things. It's not a liberalism versus conservatism thing.
Click to expand...

not really, that modus operandi belongs to the democrats, they own it.
 
why dont you yanks just vote for a communist party? because in the long term, it might prepare america to be a better competitor against China for exports .. lol .. but hell it could happen! never say never
 
souggy said:
Quit throwing around labels.

No matter what, you have people on both side of the fence that believe that everything should be fixed by forcing people to do things. It's not a liberalism versus conservatism thing.
Click to expand...

True it is a label, the term "Liberal", "Socialist", "Communism" all have the exact same definition, just different labels, same crap. It means to "control the people", anyone belonging to that particular party wants to control people in all shape and form.

They just use "political correctness" labels because they sound nicer and less menacing and or threatening to the masses.

Yiz
 
Wirelessly posted

yizuman said:
souggy said:
Quit throwing around labels.

No matter what, you have people on both side of the fence that believe that everything should be fixed by forcing people to do things. It's not a liberalism versus conservatism thing.
Click to expand...

True it is a label, the term "Liberal", "Socialist", "Communism" all have the exact same definition, just different labels, same crap. It means to "control the people", anyone belonging to that particular party wants to control people in all shape and form.

They just use "political correctness" labels because they sound nicer and less menacing and or threatening to the masses.

Yiz
Click to expand...

*facepalms*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top