kokonut
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
- Messages
- 15,855
- Reaction score
- 2
1. It has its own concept different from Ford concept.
2. It does not pay exhuberant amount for its executives
3. It has program to make its workers happy
4. It took over 20 years to solidify its reputation as reliable & cheap cars
5. It never stops progressing and innovating
6. it has one of the most efficient and cutting edge supply management system
GM did none of those.... thus continues to fail. GM has one of the most inefficient supply system, continues to pay exuberant amount to CEO's, succumb to UAW, place priority on looks instead of functionality, and so many more. That's why this is a common subject for business classes. Toyota Model is a well-studied case for business students. Who the F***! want to buy a shit American car for same price as japanese car (but cheaper maintenance and cheaper parts)? Exception is Cadillac. There's a reason why "Cadillac" is universally-known term.
something for you to read why Toyota is winning - Amazon.com: Toyota: Books or Let me google that for you
btw - you might want to check on what you just said. But that's ok... since you have no business background![]()
Um, there are Toyota plants *in* the USA. There are American made cars but with foreign parts shipped in. Plus, Toyota plants in America use non-union labor. That's the key in keeping cost down. Plus, they are not restricted in getting the parts needed while UAW ensures that inflexibility against GM such as contract agreements against from using lower-wage, non-union workers to get the needed parts. Toyota, in the United States, are not bounded by that inflexibility. This allows them to adjust and streamline their work to improve efficiency of scale and where they can get their parts. The shorter the distance in getting the parts, the less money it'll cost to transport them. So, yeah, I don't know what I'm talking about Jiro. It's the UAW's demand and inflexibility by keeping it "only union" in all aspect from buying parts from companies that use union labor to their own employees. No wonder GM had this long, long slide over the last decade to the point of bankruptcy. They were unable to compete because they were totally inflexible. That was not the case for Toyota. Oh, there's something else in my background I haven't divulged but since you assumed....I'll go with that.