Cheney linked to concealment of CIA project

Status
Not open for further replies.

Liebling:-)))

Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
31,020
Reaction score
9
Cheney linked to concealment of CIA project

Former vice president told agency to hide it from Congress, 2 sources say



The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agency’s director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.

The report that Mr. Cheney was behind the decision to conceal the still-unidentified program from Congress deepened the mystery surrounding it, suggesting that the Bush administration had put a high priority on the program and its secrecy.

Mr. Panetta, who ended the program when he first learned of its existence from subordinates on June 23, briefed the two intelligence committees about it in separate closed sessions the next day.

Efforts to reach Mr. Cheney through relatives and associates were unsuccessful.

The question of how completely the C.I.A. informed Congress about sensitive programs has been hotly disputed by Democrats and Republicans since May, when Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the agency of failing to reveal in 2002 that it was waterboarding a terrorism suspect, a claim Mr. Panetta rejected.

Some leeway on disclosure
The law requires the president to make sure the intelligence committees “are kept fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States, including any significant anticipated intelligence activity.” But the language of the statute, the amended National Security Act of 1947, leaves some leeway for judgment, saying such briefings should be done “to the extent consistent with due regard for the protection from unauthorized disclosure of classified information relating to sensitive intelligence sources and methods or other exceptionally sensitive matters.”

In addition, for covert action programs, a particularly secret category in which the role of the United States is hidden, the law says that briefings can be limited to the so-called Gang of Eight, consisting of the Republican and Democratic leaders of both houses of Congress and of their intelligence committees.

The disclosure about Mr. Cheney’s role in the unidentified C.I.A. program comes a day after an inspector general’s report underscored the central role of the former vice president’s office in restricting to a small circle of officials knowledge of the National Security Agency’s program of eavesdropping without warrants, a degree of secrecy that the report concluded hurt the effectiveness of the counterterrorism surveillance effort.

Democrats in Congress, who contend that the covert action provision was abused to cover up programs under President Bush, are seeking to change the law to permit the full committees to be briefed on more matters. President Obama, however, has threatened to veto the intelligence authorization bill if the changes go too far, and the proposal is now being negotiated by the White House and the intelligence committees.

A spokesman for the intelligence agency, Paul Gimigliano, declined on Saturday to comment on the report of Mr. Cheney’s role.

“It’s not agency practice to discuss what may or may not have been said in a classified briefing,” Mr. Gimigliano said. “When a C.I.A. unit brought this matter to Director Panetta’s attention, it was with the recommendation that it be shared appropriately with Congress. That was also his view, and he took swift, decisive action to put it into effect.”

Program still classified
Bill Harlow, a spokesman for George J. Tenet, who was the C.I.A. director when the unidentified program began, declined to comment on Saturday, noting that the program remains classified.

Intelligence and Congressional officials have said the unidentified program did not involve the C.I.A. interrogation program and did not involve domestic intelligence activities. They have said the program was started by the counterterrorism center at the C.I.A. shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, but never became fully operational, involving planning and some training that took place off and on from 2001 until this year.

“Because this program never went fully operational and hadn’t been briefed as Panetta thought it should have been, his decision to kill it was neither difficult nor controversial,” one intelligence official, who would speak about the classified program only on condition of anonymity. “That’s worth remembering amid all the drama.”

CONTINUED : Cheney defended secrecy of government activities

NYT: Cheney linked to hiding of CIA project - The New York Times- msnbc.com
 
Members of Congress have differed on the significance of the program, whose details remain secret. Most of those interviewed, however, have said that it was an important activity that they felt should have been disclosed.

In the eight years of his vice presidency, Mr. Cheney was the Bush administration’s most vehement defender of the secrecy of government activities, particularly in the intelligence arena. He went to the Supreme Court to keep secret the advisers to his task force on energy, and won.

A report released on Friday by the inspectors general of five agencies about the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program makes clear that Mr. Cheney’s legal adviser, David S. Addington, had to personally approve every government official who was told about the program. The report said “the exceptionally compartmented nature of the program” frustrated F.B.I. agents who were assigned to follow up on tips it turned up.

High-level N.S.A. officials who were responsible for ensuring that the surveillance program was legal, including the agency’s inspector general and general counsel, were not permitted by Mr. Cheney’s office to read the Justice Department opinion that found the eavesdropping legal, several officials said.

Mr. Addington could not be reached for comment on Saturday.

CIA truthfulness long questioned

Questions over the adequacy and the truthfulness of the C.I.A.’s briefings for Congress date back to the creation of the intelligence oversight committees in the 1970s after disclosures of agency assassination and mind-control programs and other abuses. But complaints increased in the Bush years, when the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies took the major role in pursuing Al Qaeda.


The use of harsh interrogation methods, including waterboarding, for instance, was first described to a handful of lawmakers for the first time in September 2002. Ms. Pelosi and the C.I.A. have disagreed about what she was told, but in any case, the briefing occurred only after a terrorism suspect, Abu Zubaydah, had been waterboarded 83 times.

Representative Jan Schakowsky, a Democrat of Illinois on the House committee, wrote on Friday to the chairman, Representative Silvestre Reyes, Democrat of Texas, to demand an investigation of the unidentified program and why Congress was not told of it. Aides said Mr. Reyes was reviewing the matter.

“There’s been a history of difficulty in getting the C.I.A. to tell us what they should,” said Representative Adam Smith, Democrat of Washington. “We will absolutely be held accountable for anything the agency does.”

Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, the committee’s top Republican, said he would not judge the agency harshly in the case of the unidentified program, because it was not fully operational. But he said that in general, the agency has not been as forthcoming as the law requires.

“We have to pull the information out of them to get what we need,” Mr. Hoekstra said.

NYT: Cheney linked to hiding of CIA project - The New York Times- msnbc.com
 
Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'

The head of the CIA has accused former US Vice-President Dick Cheney of concealing an intelligence programme from Congress, a top US senator says.

The existence of the programme, set up after 9/11, was hidden for eight years and its precise nature remains unclear.

Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein confirmed that CIA chief Leon Panetta told Congressional committees he had abandoned the project on hearing of it.

He said that Mr Cheney was behind the secrecy, Sen Feinstein said.

There has been no comment from Mr Cheney.

War of words

'Congress should have been told,' said Sen Feinstein
The California senator, who is chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee, told Fox News on Sunday that Mr Panetta told her about the programme on 24 June, shortly after hearing about it, and said he had cancelled it.

The Bush administration may have broken the law, Sen Feinstein said, adding that Congress should never be kept in the dark, even though the country was still in shock after the 9/11 attacks.

"This is a big problem," she said.

"I understand the need of the day... but I think you weaken your case when you go outside the law."

But Texas Republican John Cornyn told Fox News that the allegations were part of political moves to distract attention from problems faced by Democrat leaders in Congress.

The claims come amid an increasingly bitter row between the CIA and Congress over whether key information was withheld about other aspects of the agency's operations.

'Capture or kill'

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has claimed that the CIA misled her about interrogation methods including water-boarding, while other senior Democrats have quoted Mr Panetta as admitting that his agency regularly misled Congress before he took office.



CIA chief Leon Panetta is said to have closed the programme
Details of the newly-revealed secret programme have still not been divulged.

However, the Wall Street Journal reports that the programme was an attempt to act on a 2001 presidential authorisation issued by President George W Bush to capture or kill al-Qaeda operatives.

Quoting current and former government officials, the newspaper says the CIA spent money on planning and possibly some training.

The New York Times, which broke the story about Mr Cheney's alleged role, also quoted officials as saying the programme was launched by anti-terror operatives at the CIA soon after the 2001 attacks, and involved planning and training but never became fully operational.

Another unnamed official told AP it was an embryonic intelligence-gathering effort, aimed at yielding intelligence that would be used to conduct covert operations abroad.

But the BBC's Kim Ghattas, in Washington, says there is some debate in the intelligence world about how significant the programme actually was.

Regardless of the details, the debate now is about the secrecy that surrounded the programme and whether by concealing it the Bush administration broke the law, our correspondent says.

Veto threat

Mr Panetta - who took over directorship of the CIA under President Obama's administration - is said to have learnt about the programme only on 23 June.

The next day he called an emergency meeting with congressional intelligence committees to tell them about its existence and to say that it was being cancelled.

The allegations come as Democrats in Congress are trying to push through new rules that would increase the number of members of Congress who are told about covert operations.

The White House is threatening to veto the bill, fearing that operational secrecy could be compromised.

The CIA has not commented on the reports of Mr Cheney's role.

"It's not agency practice to discuss what may or may not have been said in a classified briefing," said spokesman Paul Gimigliano.

"When a CIA unit brought this matter to Director Panetta's attention, it was with the recommendation that it be shared appropriately with Congress. That was also his view, and he took swift, decisive action to put it into effect."

A CIA spokesman insisted earlier this week that "it is not the policy or practice of the CIA to mislead Congress".


ROUND-UP OF OPINIONS ACROSS THE WEB

CIA chief Leon Panetta's accusation has got columnists, commentators and bloggers talking about the implications for Dick Cheney and the intelligence community.

Fox News's Congress correspondent Chad Pergram wonders what the news reveals about the relationship between the intelligence community and politicians:


All of this is baffling. But it points to one thing: a potential politicization of U.S. intelligence. Someone leaking the allegation that this program was hidden from Congress by Vice President Cheney is political. True or not, someone wanted to get that out. The fact that the gang of seven leaked its letter is political. Someone wanted that document publicized.

Rupert Cornwell in the Independent says that the US now needs a truth and reconciliation inquiry:

There will surely also be new demands for a broad investigation into how the Bush administration waged its war on terror. The White House has so far rejected demands for a South African-style truth and reconciliation commission to examine what happened. But for how much longer?

In the New York Times' politics and government blog, The Caucus, Janie Lorber pictures the scene of the CIA chief finding out about the project:


By law, intelligence committees are to be "kept fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States, including any significant anticipated intelligence activity." But an amendment leaves some leeway for judgment when it comes to "exceptionally sensitive matters".

While few details about the program have emerged, we do know that the agency's current director, Leon Panetta, did not know about the program until June 23 when he was alerted by subordinates—imagine that conversation—at which point he halted the program and alerted Congress in closed-door meetings the following day.

Kansas City Star Editorial Page columnist Yael T. Abouhalkah looks at what this will mean for Cheney's reputation:


Former Vice President Dick Cheney's penchant for keeping secrets may permanently damage his legacy as a patriotic American.

…If Cheney were involved in purposefully misleading Congress, that could wind up being a huge black mark against the former vice president.
It begs for a complete congressional investigation, so the American people know whether Cheney violated his oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States.

Republican strategist Mary Matalin said on CNN that the reports about Cheney were a distraction designed to avert attention away from the policy struggles of the Obama administration:


The president's agenda is almost in shambles. His [poll] numbers are dropping. Isn't it coincidental …Every time they get in trouble . . . they dredge up a Darth Vader story.

The US veterans' blog This Aint Hell takes a tongue-in-cheek look at the story:

The media and the Democrat Congress is having conniption fits because they think that the Evil Bush Administration (TM) had a secret program to kill terrorist leaders and they didn't bother to tell Congress about it ...Oh, no! Bush and Cheney didn't support the operation? But that doesn't fit the narrative! Look, fellas, if we're going to have an evil plot against Congress, we're going to need Bush and Cheney involved, otherwise, how will we ever be able to impeach them? Um, retroactively?
If I was going to have an operation against the nation's enemies and I needed to keep it secret, I wouldn't tell the drama queen, leaky Democrats until the last possible moment either.

In the Huffington Post, comedian John Marshall sends up the story:

In lieu of an investigation, officials are considering commemorating Cheney's vice presidency with an all-star memorial, to be broadcast on five networks and feature video clips of water boarding, sleep deprivation, e-mail mining, iPhone tapping and face shooting. Fans could Twitter their favorite Cheney security violations.


BBC NEWS | Americas | Cheney 'ordered CIA to hide plan'
 
This doesn't look good.

I'm also not surprised that this happened considering the history of the last 8 years. :roll:
 
This doesn't look good.

I'm also not surprised that this happened considering the history of the last 8 years. :roll:

Its not surprise that the Republicans tried to cover up Bush's crimes.
 
Republicans sounds like corrupted in many cases, some members aren't.
 
Bush and Cheney committed so many crimes that they are "pardoned" by the government just because they are President and Vice President who thinks they can get away from that shit they caused.

Bush ruined everything and the Iraqi War was a very poor idea EVER.

*sigh* at least he's out of office for good and it's gonna leave us years to clean up the whole shit they left behind.
 
This is something that has always bothered me. Members of Congress aren't held to the same levels of security that military people are. Just because they are elected to office it is assumed that they qualify for access to classified information. There have been too many leaks of classified information when dealing with members of Congress. If military members blabbed as much as Congressmen, they'd be court martialed and sent to prison.

FDR never informed Congress of the development of the atom bomb during WWII. Apparently presidents of the past didn't trust Congress either.
 
This is something that has always bothered me. Members of Congress aren't held to the same levels of security that military people are. Just because they are elected to office it is assumed that they qualify for access to classified information. There have been too many leaks of classified information when dealing with members of Congress. If military members blabbed as much as Congressmen, they'd be court martialed and sent to prison.

FDR never informed Congress of the development of the atom bomb during WWII. Apparently presidents of the past didn't trust Congress either.

Exactly why I don't really care about CIA "omitting" information to Congress. However it is a serious serious concern to me if CIA did same to White House.

Was Bush given a faulty information by CIA? yes
Was Bush misled or lied to by CIA? no
 
Bush and Cheney committed so many crimes that they are "pardoned" by the government just because they are President and Vice President who thinks they can get away from that shit they caused.

Bush ruined everything and the Iraqi War was a very poor idea EVER.

*sigh* at least he's out of office for good and it's gonna leave us years to clean up the whole shit they left behind.

In case you didn't know - Obama is not interested in pursuing Bush and Cheney. Obama's Attorney General has not decided on investigating them either. If you think Bush & Cheney can get away with it, then Obama is getting away with it too by turning a blind eye on it. Obama's as guilty as them..... that's if you want to go down that road.
 
Its not surprise that the Republicans tried to cover up Bush's crimes.

and Democrats too... and Pelosi... and Hillary Clinton.... the list will run deep on both parties.

Not surprising either. please get a new hobby.
 
yes, right. President, Vice-President, all 435 Members of Congress are not required to have security clearances (S, TS, SCI, etc) because they are elected.

This is something that has always bothered me. Members of Congress aren't held to the same levels of security that military people are. Just because they are elected to office it is assumed that they qualify for access to classified information. There have been too many leaks of classified information when dealing with members of Congress. If military members blabbed as much as Congressmen, they'd be court martialed and sent to prison.

FDR never informed Congress of the development of the atom bomb during WWII. Apparently presidents of the past didn't trust Congress either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top