California Proposition 1A, High Speed Rail infrastructure

Status
Not open for further replies.

sequoias

Active Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
22,242
Reaction score
19
Yep, you read the title....it passed with a yes vote! California is gonna get a shiny new 220 mph high speed trains linking LA and SF and San Diego, etc. It should be open to service early as 2020. Check this out at California High-Speed Rail They got news on the home page of the site about the passing of the prop 1A.
 
Yep, you read the title....it passed with a yes vote! California is gonna get a shiny new 220 mph high speed trains linking LA and SF and San Diego, etc. It should be open to service early as 2020. Check this out at California High-Speed Rail They got news on the home page of the site about the passing of the prop 1A.

Boy, that is a looong wait and ask yourself as if the state of California could afford something like this? High unlikely!
 
Boy, that is a looong wait and ask yourself as if the state of California could afford something like this? High unlikely!

well, they have planned it for 14 years. The taxes to fund it will happen, which the voters approved that. It is not a long wait and that's normal length of time. You are building a state high speed rail system spanning hundred of miles, which takes a while to construct.
 
More high-speed train, I'll be more happy to ride. But it would be sour news for country home (farmer, outsider, etc)
 
well, they have planned it for 14 years. The taxes to fund it will happen, which the voters approved that. It is not a long wait and that's normal length of time. You are building a state high speed rail system spanning hundred of miles, which takes a while to construct.

Yes, I could imagine how much work it takes esp the mountain parts, but my point is the tax money needed to cover for it yet state of California's economy is not in good shape... almost bankruptcy.
 
More high-speed train, I'll be more happy to ride. But it would be sour news for country home (farmer, outsider, etc)

How? The high speed trains are generally quiet, they only make a whoosh sound when they go past. They are fenced away from the public, too. You can't drive across it, as it will be over traffic or under traffic like they do in Europe.

Yes, I could imagine how much work it takes esp the mountain parts, but my point is the tax money needed to cover for it yet state of California's economy is not in good shape... almost bankruptcy.

Well, wait til in a few years as California should recover. Arnold didn't do a good job with California. I wonder when California will have the next election for the governor. We already re-elected for WA state this year the same time Obama won.
 
How? The high speed trains are generally quiet, they only make a whoosh sound when they go past. They are fenced away from the public, too. You can't drive across it, as it will be over traffic or under traffic like they do in Europe.



Well, wait til in a few years as California should recover. Arnold didn't do a good job with California. I wonder when California will have the next election for the governor. We already re-elected for WA state this year the same time Obama won.

Hmm... wait n see if they eventually make it a reality or bust.

But sure enough, it would be nice if it turns into a reality... if so, I would hop on it someday, that is after the year 2020!
 
Hmm... wait n see if they eventually make it a reality or bust.

But sure enough, it would be nice if it turns into a reality... if so, I would hop on it someday, that is after the year 2020!

Depends how the tax structure works, the voters can dissolve the agency it if they ask for a ballot...
 
More high-speed train, I'll be more happy to ride. But it would be sour news for country home (farmer, outsider, etc)

Oh, it will definitely create some unhappy while some happy by selling some land for $$!

That's why it dragged so long for those southwestern Indiana parts where they planned for paving a new I-69 highway... still working on it for more than 15 years or more. (due to those complaint and hill reasons)
 
How? The high speed trains are generally quiet, they only make a whoosh sound when they go past. They are fenced away from the public, too. You can't drive across it, as it will be over traffic or under traffic like they do in Europe.



Well, wait til in a few years as California should recover. Arnold didn't do a good job with California. I wonder when California will have the next election for the governor. We already re-elected for WA state this year the same time Obama won.

It will have governor election in 2010.

Same here, Arnold isn't good governor when come with economy.

Congratulation on passed of vote for high speed rail, it would be very nice.
 
How? The high speed trains are generally quiet, they only make a whoosh sound when they go past. They are fenced away from the public, too. You can't drive across it, as it will be over traffic or under traffic like they do in Europe.

There is already set the example in Europe that there are certain people called it sore eyes when they want to see beautiful land.
 
Oh, it will definitely create some unhappy while some happy by selling some land for $$!

That's why it dragged so long for those southwestern Indiana parts where they planned for paving a new I-69 highway... still working on it for more than 15 years or more. (due to those complaint and hill reasons)

There are always people who choice to against, it's not about the money but it's about protect their land, or it's about safely issues as if it crash and it blew up over their properly. There are many reason.
 
this needs to happen not only in california but everywhere. Europe has transpo in the forms of speed rail trains like... everywhere, way way ahead os us on that curve. And California is in bad shape with their economy but at the same time its actually one of the biggest moneymakers too. This project will get funding somewhere. Guaranteed.
 
Yeah, the reason why we need high speed rail in California due to congested airports and cant expand anymore so people take the train instead and not worry about flight delays and cancellations, also.
 
There is already set the example in Europe that there are certain people called it sore eyes when they want to see beautiful land.

There's always pros and cons for everything and there's nothing we can do about it. Farms always take up land, so where would we build it, get over it and accept it.
 
Yup, we are broke yet we passed this. Should be exciting and vital....we will work out the money....
 
Yup, we are broke yet we passed this. Should be exciting and vital....we will work out the money....

Yeah, I find that ironic for California being broke and they passed with a yes vote.
 
Yep, you read the title....it passed with a yes vote! California is gonna get a shiny new 220 mph high speed trains linking LA and SF and San Diego, etc.
Wow! That's awesome! I wish Texas offers that!

High speed railroads will likely be one of the popular transportations as more people spread out.

And it would be so nice to see mountains on a high speed rail!
 
Yeah, I find that ironic for California being broke and they passed with a yes vote.

Yeah, we will just float some bonds and let the grand-kiddies take care of it! :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top