Sorenson again

Chevy57

Chevy57

Sherlock Hound
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
11,353
Reaction score
6
[yt]jZVnSjDxzkA[/yt]

Trayerade's Vlog report:

Sorenson requests that FCC re-consider their order.

I know that they won't want real 10-digital phone number.
 
dbarovian said:
[yt]jZVnSjDxzkA[/yt]

Trayerade's Vlog report:

Sorenson requests that FCC re-consider their order.

I know that they won't want real 10-digital phone number.
Click to expand...

Are you sure that what Sorenson doesn't want that 10 digital number? They already have one which they are current beta stage. Mean we will get that 10 digital numbers soon.

He has one misleading that he didn't pay attention on one condition....

VRS MUST pay their own expense to buy us a default 10 digital numbers. Mean that VRS have enough fund compare what Sorenson's fund?

Sorenson against other VRS, I don't think so but other VRS is whining because of Sorenson have that fund ready for technology. What more benefit of that E911 which he misunderstood. CSDVRS explaining clear that E911, have the information ready. Our name, Home address, and phone number where can be reach at...

Should we say VRS WAR Again?
 
Why would SVRS want to re-consider this? Just that is it too hard for them, no?
 
No, it not just too hard for just SVRS.

It will hard for all VRS due pressure of neutral system mean any device can call without ip address. It not that just simple to run around the server to tap the neutral server.

For example; you will notice some loading on our device or viable to log in that pick up information. Once a while you will see strange charts of contact people list while the website start reading the CSS program to make look normal.

It running on SQL of our information into their server. The problem is Neutral system that is big issue due for example... If our videophone run on MAC ID base on account number due to get our contact list, keep update itself... while if we want the different default VRS. They have to set up the MAC ID to new account for that specific VRS by user's wish.

Image, if I have over thousand Sorenson product, they have caution with all database that running around with neutral server. Remember, we get several time by crash because SQL read the error and got down. Now it seem promise to improve, now we will all have problem again like Sorenson does with another VRS possible down with 10 digital number until they figure the bug to sorta out until improve and smooth.

Same thing with our pager went down, name one which company is perfect? I would say the perfect is galaxies why, because it didn't hit our home yet.. (hopefully not too soon to say!)



JClarke said:
Why would SVRS want to re-consider this? Just that is it too hard for them, no?
Click to expand...
 
Sorenson Communications has filed a petition for reconsideration and clarification of certain E911 rules adopted in the Commission’s June 24, 2008 Report and Order. Sorenson is asking the Commission to continue to allow the use of proxy numbers; recognize that 911 calls must be routed over administrative lines in certain circumstances; and clarify the date by which E911 must be fully implemented.
 
dbarovian said:
Sorenson Communications has filed a petition for reconsideration and clarification of certain E911 rules adopted in the Commission’s June 24, 2008 Report and Order. Sorenson is asking the Commission to continue to allow the use of proxy numbers; recognize that 911 calls must be routed over administrative lines in certain circumstances; and clarify the date by which E911 must be fully implemented.
Click to expand...

where the link that "reconsideration"
 
I read about that link you shared, it point about Proxy system that would impossible for VRS success. Without Proxy, how will remote where the interpreter we dial the VRS and where the interpreter come from?

Once one of us dial, it will remote the nearest VRS to their place where they can be reach...

Similar to wireless.att.com/learn/popups/push-talk-faq.jsp as Sorenson example of those...

Possible they try to make easier for 911 purpose... instead waiting for the interpreter on screen and then dial 911. I would rather just dial 911 and 911 get information ready and wait for interpreter ready...

Without information, it could delay...


dbarovian said:
You may read this FCC filing about it.

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6520038528
Click to expand...
 
Possible they try to make easier for 911 purpose... instead waiting for the interpreter on screen and then dial 911. I would rather just dial 911 and 911 get information ready and wait for interpreter ready...


Without information, it could delay...[/QUOTE]

Better make e911 instead of traditional 911. use dial it in VP before emergency servce will come faster .

I still wait to listen when FCC will announce it before dec 31.
 
zerodog said:
I read about that link you shared, it point about Proxy system that would impossible for VRS success. Without Proxy, how will remote where the interpreter we dial the VRS and where the interpreter come from?

Once one of us dial, it will remote the nearest VRS to their place where they can be reach...

Similar to wireless.att.com/learn/popups/push-talk-faq.jsp as Sorenson example of those...

Possible they try to make easier for 911 purpose... instead waiting for the interpreter on screen and then dial 911. I would rather just dial 911 and 911 get information ready and wait for interpreter ready...

Without information, it could delay...
Click to expand...

If I understand what you talking about... please view CSDVRS's E911 link.

911vrs: now from CSDVRS

This link did mention if you dial 911 on your videophone, it will jump to priority. No how long the waiting time is... it immediately override and be first to capture an Interpreter.

Just view the link and review it because it explain a lot how it works. I am not sure if its official released as standard practice at this point.
 
Deaf Mortgage said:
If I understand what you talking about... please view CSDVRS's E911 link.

911vrs: now from CSDVRS

This link did mention if you dial 911 on your videophone, it will jump to priority. No how long the waiting time is... it immediately override and be first to capture an Interpreter.

Just view the link and review it because it explain a lot how it works. I am not sure if its official released as standard practice at this point.
Click to expand...

Well, I need e911 system which automatically associates a physical address with the calling party's telephone number, and routes the call to the most appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) for that address, to dial on videophone. I dislike that wasting time to send info on address, city and state to VRS. I still wait to get new e911 system after December 31.
 
Deaf Mortgage said:
If I understand what you talking about... please view CSDVRS's E911 link.

911vrs: now from CSDVRS

This link did mention if you dial 911 on your videophone, it will jump to priority. No how long the waiting time is... it immediately override and be first to capture an Interpreter.

Just view the link and review it because it explain a lot how it works. I am not sure if its official released as standard practice at this point.
Click to expand...

Yes, That one I am talking about that information isn't IMMEDIATLEY to capture interpreter... I dial 911 and wait wait wait.. I try SVRS, HOVRS, VIABLE, CSDVRS and put me wait for 15 minutes!

So I don't think E-911 is effective!

I rather override the point to point from 911 system and videophone instead the interpreter.

Again, I don't think any VRS are enable of what Sorenson can.
 
dbarovian said:
Well, I need e911 system which automatically associates a physical address with the calling party's telephone number, and routes the call to the most appropriate Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) for that address, to dial on videophone. I dislike that wasting time to send info on address, city and state to VRS. I still wait to get new e911 system after December 31.
Click to expand...

I am start looking and wonder if youtube is actually a "YOU" due you were former Sorenson employee.

Again -- if you remember Sorenson capable of business and largest VRS than any VRS.

Again, compare of what you remember in past to today and they are different?

Beside; Sorenson did well... 911 is still pointless, again Sorenson is just asking FCC issue with PROXY due remote...

Do you know what Remote is? Due as route to the near center, not mean waiting for interpreter... mean it go to 911.
 
Back
Top