jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
I'm a firm believer in sex education. And I think that just teaching abstinence is asking for trouble. Just because you only teach abstinence doesn't mean that kids will all be abstinent, and it's extremely naive to think otherwise. A lot of those kids also probably aren't getting info from their parents or other sources, so then you wind up with kids getting into some serious messes because they weren't properly informed.
When I lived in England I saw a documentary on sex education in Europe. The UK admitted that it's sex ed was basically non-existent, and that teen pregnancy rates were really high. They also took a good look at the Netherlands. Sex ed there was *really* thorough- they even discussed things like homosexual relations and masturbation. It so happens that they also had the lowest teen pregnancy rate in Europe.
Read a study a year or so ago, and in fact, posted the link around here somewhere. Longitudinal reasearch followed 2 groups, one provided comprehensive sex ed, one provided abstinence ed only. Across measures of things like "age first engaged in sexual intercourse/activity", "number of partners", "frequency of sexual activity", etc. both groups reported the same results. Only difference? Those who had abstinence only training became pregnant at younger ages and more frequently.