NEW limited poll on sexually explicit avatars & signatures

[Liebling:-)))]

And you and I BOTH travel for the cook-offs and we use the computer at the library and Alldeaf wasn't block at all...


And when RR and I go on our honeymoon to Hawaii, Ill be sure to stop at the library to see if it's block or not....I rather to believe it when I see it....

Yeah, Alldeaf forum doesn't block at workplace, too... It shows that everyone knows that Alldeaf forum is not dirty forum but they need to log in if they want to see the view at Pictures and Adult Sections.

 

[Angel]

Yeah, Alldeaf forum doesn't block at workplace, too... It shows that everyone knows that Alldeaf forum is not dirty forum but they need to log in if they want to see the view at Pictures and Adult Sections.

Exactly...

 

[JeepGirl]

suit urself im done with this thread u want to keep fighting fine keep fighting i dont care anymore u all have close minded concept of respect..... others do not like it u dont care what others things its pretty obvious ur all narrow minded on respect!!!!!!!!

Vice Versa.... goes both ways... as if you guys don't care about how we feel either, hon.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

suit urself im done with this thread u want to keep fighting fine keep fighting i dont care anymore u all have close minded concept of respect..... others do not like it u dont care what others things its pretty obvious ur all narrow minded on respect!!!!!!!!

Anyone who disrespect nudity as nutural is closed minded... It's sad that anyone teach the children to be ashamed, not proud of their bodies...

I know Americans would consider it as sex harassment or sexual abusvie when the parents allow their children watch nudity/soft sex movies on TV.

 

[Maria]

After I read all these posts - Gee, some of you are sooo immature and have NO moral to CARE about the kids ! I find that hard to believe. Some of you have NO feelings. All you want to think about is YOURSELF, not the kids. Some of you CARE about yourself what YOU want for your avatar/signature images, NOT the kids. Gee... that shows me how poor responsibility some of you are. :roll:

 

[Liebling:-)))]

After I read all these posts - Gee, some of you are sooo immature and have NO moral to CARE about the kids ! I find that hard to believe. Some of you have NO feelings. All you want to think about is YOURSELF, not the kids. Some of you CARE about yourself what YOU want for your avatar/signature images, NOT the kids. Gee... that shows me how poor responsibility some of you are. :roll:

Don't be prudish.

It will end children into immature and focus their curiously in wrong way, if the parents are paranoid and nudity/sexual denial etc.

You show yourself as paranoid and hypocritical in your post here how judge you are over nudity as a pervert or even worst… *shake my head*. I don't see nudity as "sexual thing" but merely as the way of nature.


Check this link

http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=479181&postcount=48

*shake my head*

 

[Maria]

Don't be prudish.

It will end children into immature and focus their curiously in wrong way, if the parents are paranoid and nudity/sexual denial etc.

You show yourself as paranoid and hypocritical in your post here how judge you are over nudity as a pervert or even worst… *shake my head*. I don't see nudity as "sexual thing" but merely as the way of nature.


Check this link

http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=479181&postcount=48

*shake my head*

And you call me that paranoid and hypocritical ? Wrong ! All I can see that is all bein' said in this thread and how some of you responded about your avatar/signature images. It shows obviously through the glasses. It's true that some of you have no morals when considerin' about your OWN avatar/signature images what eva YOU want rather than thinkin' about other people's children. Some of you should bein' considerate about other people's children. And, of course - I don't mean to say " off-topic" here where you created your new thread about a 6 years old boy was bein' suspended from school, just because he got the idea from the book where it might show an image in there, hmm ? That's INFLUENCE - at the same time, he was a quite innocent because he don't know anythin' about " sex " stuff. He is too young to understand. But, that enough got him into trouble. Gee - that gives the children a wrong impression.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

And you call me that paranoid and hypocritical ? Wrong !

No, I didn't call you paraniod and hypocritical. I only said that you show yourself in your post as paraniod and hypocritical. It's difference.

All I can see that is all bein' said in this thread and how some of you responded about your avatar/signature images. It shows obviously through the glasses. It's true that some of you have no morals when considerin' about your OWN avatar/signature images what eva YOU want rather than thinkin' about other people's children. Some of you should bein' considerate about other people's children.

It look like my signature is also dirty, too... :roll: All what I see all avators and signature here is sense of humors, passionate, caress, etc EXCEPT hard porn. We are adults and know what we doing with our avators and signatures becasue we know our limit. If we want talk dirty then go to Adult section.

And, of course - I don't mean to say " off-topic" here where you created your new thread about a 6 years old boy was bein' suspended from school, just because he got the idea from the book where it might show an image in there, hmm ? That's INFLUENCE - at the same time, he was a quite innocent because he don't know anythin' about " sex " stuff. He is too young to understand. But, that enough got him into trouble. Gee - that gives the children a wrong impression.

But I see different.

Sure, the child are innoncent and victim of stupid law system to consider it as sex harassment or sex abusive..... Thanks to closed minded teacher... :roll:

See the example:

Baby yanked from couple for kisses on belly button

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45477

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163844,00.html

What you say about this? Do you still want to say the father is an innocent because he didn't know that kiss baby's belly as sex abuse accord law system... ? :roll:

 

[Maria]

But I see different.

Sure, the child are innoncent and victim of stupid law system to consider it as sex harassment or sex abusive..... Thanks to closed minded teacher... :roll:

See the example:

Baby yanked from couple for kisses on belly button

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45477

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163844,00.html

What you say about this? Do you still want to say the father is an innocent because he didn't know that kiss baby's belly as sex abuse accord law system... ? :roll:

Well, you said I show myself in my post about me bein' paranoid/hypocritical. Ok, let me tell you - the answer is no. That's NOT what I feel when I posted to say somethin' when I see things in this thread. Ok ?

Well, from what I am seein' in this nowdays -- people are now seein' things backward. I don't want to type long post in this thread because, it will go off-topic and I don't want to do that. I don't mind doin' it in your thread where there's no poll involved. Thank you. ( I will respond in the link where you provided later. Thanks for providin' it to me. )

 

[Cheri]

After I read all these posts - Gee, some of you are sooo immature and have NO moral to CARE about the kids ! I find that hard to believe. Some of you have NO feelings. All you want to think about is YOURSELF, not the kids. Some of you CARE about yourself what YOU want for your avatar/signature images, NOT the kids. Gee... that shows me how poor responsibility some of you are. :roll:

Ahh really? Why don't you check your own post that you suggested an avatar for AJ. http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=386845&postcount=16

 

[Maria]

Ahh really? Why don't you check your own post that you suggested an avatar for AJ. http://www.alldeaf.com/showpost.php?p=386845&postcount=16

That was in 2005, not in 2006. The year of 2005 is too old. I want to see the year of 2006 to be the best than 2005 and before that.

 

[Mookie]

That was in 2005, not in 2006. The year of 2005 is too old. I want to see the year of 2006 to be the best than 2005 and before that.

Ow! RedCyber Cheri

Too late, you already posted for AJ's taste....

If you do not like, please go to clean forum....

 

[Maria]

Ow! RedCyber Cheri

Too late, you already posted for AJ's taste....

If you do not like, please go to clean forum....

Every person changed after learnin' some things in life. Some don't. Remember that...

 

[Mookie]

You don't know that, It could be for other reasons, Most Libraries don't accept certain website that they're not familiar with, I had to download deafchat when I was in the library, I had to ask for permission first, and they allowing me to download Java to order to get on deafchat.

Javapride, See Cheri's post.

I knew you are coming back to peek on this thread....

Javapride, did you inquire librarians about possibly to enter the AllDeaf website? They are not aware of AllDeaf since no body from the mainland would come to the public library since they only comes for vacation....

 

[Cheri]

That was in 2005, not in 2006. The year of 2005 is too old. I want to see the year of 2006 to be the best than 2005 and before that.

Does not matter, You can sit here and judge me about being responsible and doesn't care about other people kids Let me tell you something It's not my duty to watch lazy parent's children while they are on the Internet. It remind me of a friend of mine who comes to a family reunion, ignored her kids the entire reunion, and expect everyone else to watch her kids, I don't think so, She is a mother she takes care of her own kids.

 

[TweetyBird]

oh boy! still agrue over this??? *smh* i better go library and check myself and see if block or not TODAY!... then i will let yall know abt that.. when i am at library and check computer, i will be on SK2 and answer here quicky!

 

[Mookie]

oh boy! still agrue over this??? *smh* i better go library and check myself and see if block or not TODAY!... then i will let yall know abt that.. when i am at library and check computer, i will be on SK2 and answer here quicky!

Don't forget to ask for permission...

 

[TweetyBird]

Don't forget to ask for permission...

i wont forget.. i will ask them.. but thanks!

 

[Reba]

I voted few days ago.

Anyway two years ago I was student at College TAFE, and I can open to read AD there, but last year its block me out

I can open AD in the computer labs at the college where I work. However, I have to be careful of the content that shows because I can get in trouble for viewing obscene pictures or language. If anyone using the school computers is caught viewing those things, then they lose computer access privileges.

 

[MsGiglz]

I wondered if plenty of those who voted G and PG are using multiple accounts to increase the votes in their favors. Is that honestly? I don't think so.

you think so? Mods should overseen that.. since Mods have not said anything.. means its single account which includes me. I voted G/pg..

but honestly.. I think you guys take chill pill.. you guys asking us to vote.. and opnions.
not just bashing us or whine about it..

sigh.. you guys acting just like our kids.. whine over little things