NEW limited poll on sexually explicit avatars & signatures

Should sexually explicit material (pics/words) be permitted in avatars/signatures?

  • No, such material should stay in the PENISARIUM only

    Votes: 32 54.2%
  • Yes, my right to free speech is more important than offending others

    Votes: 27 45.8%

  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Checkin my poll result, so far 50% of voters favors of pg-13 while 25% favors keep it G as all clean... cough cough!
 
web730 said:
Maybe. I think I was distracted by that post somehow. And that I still don't find it relevent. :confused:

But heck, debunk and forget it, okay? :deal:

Well my friend,

You need to read whole threads and posts so that you would understand. Just like you read your whole Bible.....
 
Mookie said:
Well my friend,

You need to read whole threads and posts so that you would understand. Just like you read your whole Bible.....

Ha. You wouldn't. Too, too many posts to catch up ... no way lol.
 
Let me set this straight! First of all, Alex has asked us to set up the poll so he can listen to everybody's feedback, and he didn't disallow these kinds of avatar/signature at this time. Unfortunatley one of the poll was locked down because it was biased, and this poll was targeting against Penisarium section rather than avatar/signature on how much is acceptable. So I set up my own poll to help Alex make the final decision on what to set the limitation. I have no problem with that, BUT I mean BIG BUT what offends me is that one of Mod decided to delete GA and my avatar without asking us, Whats worse, Alex didn't say that these kinds of avatar/signature can not be posted!!! WTF? who gives these mod right to remove our avatar/signature? What should be done is that we continue post avatar/signature whatever we want UNTIL Alex makes the final decision based on your feedbacks. Why can't this be done what Alex orignally wanted?
 
Wal, wal... Both MizzDeaf and I are on our way to KC for the MAAD basketball tournament ~ and I got an AIM from one of my beloved friends abt this thread... Since I'm on my SK2, it took me a while to wade through all this ... I could line a few flower gardens with all this fertilizer piling up here.

Never have I seen so many quotes used over and over and so many accusations flung back and forth... *smh*

Actually, the problem is this... And I think some will agree with me ~ at least I hope. It seems that we have three groups ~ two of whom doesn't like each other, and one that is keeping their heads down and out of range.

And we seem to be using this thread to show how much we dislike each other, and will just not listen to one another, but continue hurling wads at each other.

I don't even think we're talking about avs and sigs anymore, just venting, ranting and in general, letting everyone know how we feel about everyone else here.

Maybe we are finally clearing the air here, maybe we're not.

But...in the end, will it have been woth it all? The final decision rests with... ALEX. It is his forum, after all. He already has a winning formula in the present forum, and he may not be so willing to change it.

So far, the avs and sigs all look fine to me, and I think we don't need to change anything.

If you wanna rant on, go ahead and be my guest. Alex is the decision maker, not us, period.
 
Here are the basic ground rules that will be enforced on the Forum. First of all, the Administrator and Moderators reserve the right to remove, edit or move posts without explanation. If you have any questions, please contact me at webmaster@alldeaf.com
( alex has the right to remove without asking) this is in reference to the forum rules
 
No, Alex isn't one who removed it! I know who it was and I am not stupid! That mod wasn't following Alex's decision and was in favor of a member! That is really pissing me off.

javapride said:
Here are the basic ground rules that will be enforced on the Forum. First of all, the Administrator and Moderators reserve the right to remove, edit or move posts without explanation. If you have any questions, please contact me at webmaster@alldeaf.com
( alex has the right to remove without asking) this is in reference to the forum rules
 
see it says adminstrator AND MODERATOR has the right to remove it... so therefore.. they do not have to explain... let it go ... its done and will not be *UNDONE*
 
javapride said:
Here are the basic ground rules that will be enforced on the Forum. First of all, the Administrator and Moderators reserve the right to remove, edit or move posts without explanation. If you have any questions, please contact me at webmaster@alldeaf.com
( alex has the right to remove without asking) this is in reference to the forum rules


It says nothing about avatars and signature, again you talking off point. ;) As I remember Vampy had posted twice about our sizes in signature and how many we are allow to have, some member decide to ignored him and he removed the signature that was breaking the rules that Vampy had announced. Therefore nobody not even Alex said to remove any avatar and signature that shown any sexual, All Alex had said was, let's create a poll and vote. ;)
 
javapride said:
Here are the basic ground rules that will be enforced on the Forum. First of all, the Administrator and Moderators reserve the right to remove, edit or move posts without explanation. If you have any questions, please contact me at webmaster@alldeaf.com
( alex has the right to remove without asking) this is in reference to the forum rules


But it did not say allow to remove avatar/signature images without any explanation, since one of them removed both of their signature images without any explation whatsoever....It has nothing to do with post Javapride....
 
let's get back on topic..... this is abt avtars and sigs not abt alex and mods...
 
^Angel^ said:
But it did not say allow to remove avatar/signature images without any explanation, since one of them removed both of their signature images without any explation whatsoever....It has nothing to do with post Javapride....
granted you have a point but apparently someone filed a bad post report causing the removal... so all i can say is :-X thats all
 
javapride said:
cheri again.... pls don't put ur foot in your mouth... like eve said we mature as we grow... therefore changes are changes and we change along the way.. we got kids to think about... yes ofc like liebling said its not wrong to show them things but to make it sound like its nothing to expose the gentials and masturbation and heated behind the doors sexual legs suggesting there is sex going on. come on, pls , at the least consider the aspect of families who haven't been in here or already has been in here thier tired of seeing more and more sexual contents showing.... locking with password for penisurarium will make the parents feel better. and those who don't want to go into that section... will not have to worry abt going in and know that the kids won't be going in there either. concept wise... wheres the decorum and pride of alldeaf if your going to degrade us posters who don;t want to see those explicted crap on the avtars?


Huh? do you mean that I allow my children watch us in the bed... :confused: I´m not talk about our sex life in the bed but nudity and discuss sex issues openly with my children, that´s all...

Please don´t confused between porn. and nudity because they are total difference.

Nudity is natural...

Of course I allow my children to watch soft sex/nudity (not porn.) on TV... I can´t see the sense why should I deny sex issues and hide it from my children...

Yes, my children sees avators and signatures at AD forum.

I find so sad that the parents hide sex issues from children ...
 
javapride said:
let's get back on topic..... this is abt avtars and sigs not abt alex and mods...


You are the one who brought it up, therefore you opened a can of worms. ;)
 
javapride said:
granted you have a point but apparently someone filed a bad post report causing the removal... so all i can say is :-X thats all

It doesn't mater Javapride it didnt say that on the rules, and therefore those two members did not break no rules, so why was it removed?
 
Right! Not even single rule on what kind of images can be put in Avatar/signautre. There is rule on the sizing, and how many u can post in signature! At this time Alex has NOT made any decision... WTF why my signature was removed even though it was censored?

^Angel^ said:
It doesn't mater Javapride it didnt say that on the rules, and therefore those two members did not break no rules, so why was it removed?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top