IP-Relay vs SVRS Relay :-P

[apathrev]

Impressed? Was it much faster, more clarity and you were able to talk naturally and smoothly?

:boink:

 

[diehardbiker]

What do you really mean? Are you trying to say yes with humilation?

:boink:

 

[apathrev]

Why would I be humiliated? I've always conceded that I believe VRS is superior to TRS.

 

[diehardbiker]

I wasn't sure cause you chose that "bionk" face.

Why would I be humiliated? I've always conceded that I believe VRS is superior to TRS.

 

[diehardbiker]

So far, not even one person who used to have VP and hates it and speak out? Interesting!

 

[dkf747]

So far, not even one person who used to have VP and hates it and speak out? Interesting!

The issue some complain about is not the product, but rather the monopoly power Sorenson is gaining.

 

[diehardbiker]

Sorenson haven't entered monopoly power yet! It looks like so, but in reality NOPE! We got HOVRS, CSDVRS, HIPVRS, SprintVRS, IP-RelayVRS. How can Sorenson be monopoly while there is 7 other VRS providers exist?

The issue some complain about is not the product, but rather the monopoly power Sorenson is gaining.

 

[apathrev]

Has anyone happened to try www.http://www.ip-vrs.com?

 

[diehardbiker]

Yes, I have! Its been a while that I haven't used them. They are alrighty.

Has anyone happened to try www.http://www.ip-vrs.com?

 

[dkf747]

Sorenson haven't entered monopoly power yet! It looks like so, but in reality NOPE! We got HOVRS, CSDVRS, HIPVRS, SprintVRS, IP-RelayVRS. How can Sorenson be monopoly while there is 7 other VRS providers exist?

I cited an example in the other thread. (adding features to VP-100, that competitors can't add because the DLink is a Sorenson design) But, I agree, they are not yet a monopoly, however, thhhey are heading in that direction.