Florida teacher who had sex with three teens sentenced to 22 years in prison

she 22 and he 17 legally of age to marry and have children and die for his country,not sure he a child

Nothing was said about her marrying the teenagers!...All she wanted was Sex...and that was NOT what she was hired for...Schooling and Sex are 2 different things....She had Sex with 3 different teenagers...a total of 37 times....37 offenses, and bet my bottom dollar there were others too....
 
she 22 and he 17 legally of age to marry and have children and die for his country,not sure he a child
They couldn't be married in the state of Florida without parents' permission for under 18 years old.
 
What she did was wrong but do the 17yr old see himself as victim is he pressing charges..i think very grey area when over 16 and consenual..there is a known syndrome call it what you will that causes some women to pursue the under 16yr old boy it is serious problem that being recognized some boys suffer serious problems..
teacher friend of mine said lot more common than people think it the power the woman holds that is the addiction and from that standpoint she needs punishment as a pariah..Anyhow as you say she there to teach and get these boys in to collage that should been her only concern
 
We wont agree on this reba...
22 years is NUTs for this.
Anyway

It wouldn't be "nuts" if she were HIV positive and gave it to the students she slept with. A teacher's profession is not a dating scene. It's to prepare them for the next level of learning and anyone that abuses that trust should face strict jail time.

Laura
 
What she did was wrong but do the 17yr old see himself as victim is he pressing charges..
I think the parents filed the complaint, not the boys.

i think very grey area when over 16 and consenual..there is a known syndrome call it what you will that causes some women to pursue the under 16yr old boy it is serious problem that being recognized some boys suffer serious problems..
teacher friend of mine said lot more common than people think it the power the woman holds that is the addiction and from that standpoint she needs punishment as a pariah..Anyhow as you say she there to teach and get these boys in to collage that should been her only concern

Example of damage to student:

He was abused by a teacher
 
Impact of Sexual Abuse on Students

Whatever justification or rationalization a teacher claims,
the hurt, the harm, and the devastation to the child is the same.


Male or Female Victims. Sexual abuse of a child is the same whether the offender or victim is a male or female. The impact on boys is just as harmful and serious as it is on girls, because both will have lifetime issues.

We need to correct the wrongful thinking that boys have not been harmed. It is against the law, and morally indefensible. Teachers who have abused boys put them in high-risk situations and at high-risk for emotional difficulty, including suicide. Sexually victimized boys experience later difficulty in developing age-appropriate relationships and gravitate toward pornography and one-night stands.

If boys do not receive counseling, when they age into sexual maturity they will realize that this experience was not pleasurable and it was simply sexual abuse. At that point society must deal with the resulting problems including depression, crime, suicide, drug addiction and more sexual abuse. Studies have shown that 33% of juvenile delinquents, 40% of sexual offenders, and 76% of serial rapists report they were sexually abused as youngsters.

When male or female sexually-abused children reach sexual maturity and adulthood, they will suffer from issues such as depression, and loss of self-esteem. The damage is caused by the exploitation, the abuse of power, and the abuse of trust from a teacher or other adult in a position of authority using and exploiting either a male or a female. These victims will then lose trust in adults and authority figures.

Victims are often labeled liars by both classmates and sometimes by staff. They may also be blamed for “bringing down” popular educators. Ironically, the characteristics that make a good teacher are the same characteristics that make educators successful in getting close enough to kids to abuse them.

Educator Sexual Misconduct
 
It wouldn't be "nuts" if she were HIV positive and gave it to the students she slept with. A teacher's profession is not a dating scene. It's to prepare them for the next level of learning and anyone that abuses that trust should face strict jail time.

Laura

Or vice versa. Essentialy your arguing she deserves 22 years on the tax oyers dime because she was a teacher..
Im sorry laura
But i just csnt see how thats a good fr society. Fire her sure. And force her to do whwt ever. But im of the opinion prison should only be used for violent crininals. Not consensual sex with someone a few years apart...
I know we wont agree. In this.
all cool
 
Oh please...17 year old males. Dream of bining their teaches....
Ssre me the victim nonsense....really….
Not everyone lives, thinks, believes, or feels the same way as you do. We don't all have the same life experiences. You can't lump all 17-year-old boys together.

This is outragous....
22 years?
Yet rapist get offten kess, as as murderers...
Yes
This is nuts.
You're right, it is outrageous that rapists and murderers don't get longer sentences.
 
. . . But im of the opinion prison should only be used for violent crininals. Not consensual sex with someone a few years apart...
I know we wont agree. In this.
all cool
Minors cannot consent to sex with an adult. No matter what the minor says, sex with an adult, especially in a position of authority, is not consensual.

Since the teacher was the adult, the teacher was responsible for everything that happened.
 
Not everyone lives, thinks, believes, or feels the same way as you do. We don't all have the same life experiences. You can't lump all 17-year-old boys together.


You're right, it is outrageous that rapists and murderers don't get longer sentences.

Why not. The state does by brsnding them all children....
This is crAzy..normal 17 year okd males generalky get boners over every female they come.across...its normal...really....

Its just part of being that age....
 
Minors cannot consent to sex with an adult. No matter what the minor says, sex with an adult, especially in a position of authority, is not consensual.

Since the teacher was the adult, the teacher was responsible for everything that happened.

Riiiiiggghhhht....yet these same children. These very same minors, if they commited a crime, the state would easly and often does argue, that they acted as adults and thus should be tried as adults...
I see...
So a 17 year old child (snickers), can never ever ever consent to sex due to them being wee children. Yet do a crime.and adult the state will seek to have you tried as...so what it is it?
these children can be adults and.consent to commit crimes, yet never ever consent to possibly to having sex?
Absurd...
It truly is...
And this women got 22 years???
Nuts...
 
Why not. The state does by brsnding them all children....
This is crAzy..normal 17 year okd males generalky get boners over every female they come.across...its normal...really....

Its just part of being that age....
Having a teacher take advantage of a student is never justified no matter what excuses you try to create.
 
Having a teacher take advantage of a student is never justified no matter what excuses you try to create.

Im not creating any Excuses, im sure those 17 year ol children coukd just as easilybtake advantage of her..
Anyway...
She is mere a few years apart from them...
 
This teacher knew what she was doing...taking advantage of teenage boys and their hormones....She "made the move first"...they didn't...You make it seem "just fine and dandy" if teenage boys screw their teacher...the principal...whatever....Just because they got boners....these boys know how to use "that hand"...and now-a-days, many teenagers are having sex at a younger age....but definetly not with their teachers, neighbors...aunts...etc. Some do, without question...but the adults should be prosecuted for it.

She had 37 charges against her...not 1...this teacher. a school "HO"...She's got a problem!....and believe me...after awhile in prison...she'll forget all about these boys she raped and molested....:giggle:...the women in there will take care of "her problem".
 
This teacher knew what she was doing...taking advantage of teenage boys and their hormones....She "made the move first"...they didn't...You make it seem "just fine and dandy" if teenage boys screw their teacher...the principal...whatever....Just because they got boners....these boys know how to use "that hand"...and now-a-days, many teenagers are having sex at a younger age....but definetly not with their teachers, neighbors...aunts...etc. Some do, without question...but the adults should be prosecuted for it.

She had 37 charges against her...not 1...this teacher. a school "HO"...She's got a problem!....and believe me...after awhile in prison...she'll forget all about these boys she raped and molested....:giggle:...the women in there will take care of "her problem".

Raped? Oh stop it!!!!
Yet those same.wee boys woukd be tried as an adult if they commited a serious crime...in other words...the state is as usual full of it....
When it suits it these chikdren are adults...
When it doesnt they are wee raped chikdren at 17 who can never ever possibly consent.......
Riiiiiggghhhhht.......
 
Riiiiiggghhhht....yet these same children. These very same minors, if they commited a crime, the state would easly and often does argue, that they acted as adults and thus should be tried as adults...
I see…
Another rabbit trail diversion.

It's not working.

So a 17 year old child (snickers), can never ever ever consent to sex due to them being wee children. Yet do a crime.and adult the state will seek to have you tried as...so what it is it?
these children can be adults and.consent to commit crimes, yet never ever consent to possibly to having sex?
Absurd...
It truly is...
And this women got 22 years???
Nuts...
As usual, you defend the perpetrators rather than the victims, so there is no reasoning with you. You have no heart for victims, that's clear.
 
Im not creating any Excuses, im sure those 17 year ol children coukd just as easilybtake advantage of her..
Anyway...
She is mere a few years apart from them...
Could have? How? They had no authority over her. Besides, they didn't. The reality is she took advantage of them; they didn't take advantage of her.

So what if she was a mere few years older. She was old enough to know better, especially as a teacher.
 
Another rabbit trail diversion.

It's not working.


As usual, you defend the perpetrators rather than the victims, so there is no reasoning with you. You have no heart for victims, that's clear.

Look. Its simple really. If 17 year olds can be held responsiblw and tried as adulta which they often are depending on the crime, then the idea that 17 year olds are mere children and can never ever ever possibly consent to having sex with a women mere years apart from them is utter nonsense.
How does this work reba?
They are minors and children in everythinf but commiting crimes?
Then by some maricle they are adults?
Its very relavant actually..dismiss.it all you want...
Cool
 
Could have? How? They had no authority over her. Besides, they didn't. The reality is she took advantage of them; they didn't take advantage of her.

So what if she was a mere few years older. She was old enough to know better, especially as a teacher.

Yet tthese same 17 year old child victims if they commited a crime woukd.be old enough to know better and tried as adults...
 
Back
Top