Deafblind girl refuses to go to school after teachers BAN guide dog from dining hall

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
5
Molly Watt: Deafblind girl refuses to go to school over guide dog ban | Mail Online

A deaf and blind teenager is refusing to go to school after teachers banned her guide dog from the dining hall.

Molly Watt, 17, says she was left to eat lunch alone in a separate room because another pupil who uses the canteen is allergic to the dog.

She has since been signed off sick by a doctor after suffering a panic attack when she was separated from her black Labrador-retriever cross named Unis.

The A-level student, from Maidenhead, Berkshire, has not attended classes at Mary Hare School in Newbury, Berkshire, since November 3.

And the pupil, who has been nominated by deafblind charity Sense to carry the Olympic flame, says she will not return until the ban is lifted.

Her mother Jane, 46, said Molly is ‘besotted’ with her dog and becomes ‘distressed’ when her companion is not by her side.

Jane, a charity worker, said: ‘The school has banned Molly from taking Unis into the dining room.

‘The dog gives her independence and freedom and means everything to her.

‘She has been left to eat alone in a separate room and that stress has left her feeling incredibly down.

‘She should be able to socialise with friends at lunchtime like everybody else.

‘She was shaking, having panic attacks and was unable to sleep after being asked to leave Unis in a sideroom. Her doctor has signed her off sick.

‘My main concern is Molly's well-being and education. She doesn't deserve what is happening to her.’

Molly - who is studying English, textiles and performing - was born deaf and lost her sight aged 14.

That prompted her to move from mainstream education to the specialist boarding school for deaf children.

She initially relied on a cane or a friend to guide her between rooms but was ‘embarrassed’ to be seen with the stick.

She was given Unis in July and returned to school before the start of term in September so the two-year-old dog could learn the layout of the buildings.

But concerns were raised about the welfare of another pupil who has a ‘hyper sensitivity to allergens’ - particularly animals.

It means he is at risk of a fatal anaphylactic shock if he comes into contact with the dog.

Her mother said: ‘Molly used to bump into things and be covered in bruises.
‘She is a young girl who is fashion conscious and did not like to be seen with a cane. She would rather fall over.

‘The alternative arrangements the school has put in place are not good enough.’

School principal Tony Shaw says he consulted medical experts and charity groups before making alternative arrangements, which included re-timetabling lessons and banning the dog from the dining room.

He said it leaves Molly without Unis for less than two hours a week and he believes she could use alternative support - such as a stick or friend - to guide her during this time.

Mr Shaw said it was ‘regretful’ that restrictions were necessary but stressed they had the backing of the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association.

He added: ‘One pupil has recently been provided with a guide dog to ensure her safe mobility and the school has been working hard to accommodate her needs.

‘Another student has a current medical diagnosis of hyper sensitivity to allergens and in particular to the allergens from animals, including dogs.

‘Mary Hare has an equal duty of care to both students and a duty to ensure that any adjustments affecting the use of a guide dog are reasonable and proportionate.

‘The solution has involved re-timetabling and changes of class locations to avoid use of the same rooms and two restrictions on the movements of the guide dog.

‘These restrictions involve the hall used for weekly assembly and the main dining hall.

‘The expert medical advice has been that if the dog enters either room, the other pupil cannot use them.’

Molly was named Young Deafblind Person of the Year 2010 by deafblind charity Sense and was nominated to carry the Olympic flame.

A petition called Justice 4 Deafblind guide-dog Owner Molly Watt has been signed by more than a thousand people, including former alumni.

Can't believe this girl has been placed in an oral school for the deaf!
 
I just have one thing to say

Life over Comfort, no one has the right to jeopardize a persons life to avoid using a cane because of embarrassment.
 
Okay, here's an important question, how does that allergic student deal with the dog being in the same classroom? And why does the lunch room have to be treated differently?
 
Perhaps that student (allergic) isn't in the same classes as the girl with the dog.
 
Okay, here's an important question, how does that allergic student deal with the dog being in the same classroom? And why does the lunch room have to be treated differently?

Is the allergic student even in the same classroom? Some schools have the ability to keep classes separate but only have 1 lunchroom.
 
Sweetie, just suck it up and use a CANE!!!!! Lots of blind and high functioning deaf-blind folks do so. Also, Molly sounds SUPER co-dependent on the dog. She can't be seperated from the dog for mealtimes?!?!
 
Sweetie, just suck it up and use a CANE!!!!! Lots of blind and high functioning deaf-blind folks do so. Also, Molly sounds SUPER co-dependent on the dog. She can't be seperated from the dog for mealtimes?!?!

No need to be so judgmental. Perhaps she is not as high-functioning as you might think. Not enough details in the article.
 
We're talking about 1) a teenager and 2) an obviously co-dependancy on her guide dog who is probably her only confidant in the world. This girl needs support, encouragement... and love... and not just lip service (only words I could think of at the moment). Compassion and inclusiveness and an willingness to work together for all children, of all cultures, no matter what their challenges. I'm sorry, I shed tears thinking of her being locked away alone for her lunch. There's no "sucking it up" here. Either the school will work to help this girl or it should pay for her to attend a school that can and admit it is unable to.

Just my opinion is all.
 
My hunch is that there's more to this story than we're being told. For example, I read somewhere else that the pupil who has the allergy to dogs was seen happily playing with animals elsewhere and it was only after several weeks that a complaint was made. I've no idea how true this is, but it makes me cautious to pass judgment on this incident. As AlleyCat wrote: Not enough details
 
Didn't the article say the school changed locations of some classes, so those two wouldn't be in the same room?
I think the school is really trying! She should meet them half way in this case. Seriously, she doesn't have to eat lunch alone, just the dog needs to stay out of this one room. If she chooses to stay with her dog, okay, but what would be the other option? To allow her to bring the dog and tell the other student: "We are sorry, from now on you can't go in there anymore, the dog is inside, you could die."
I don't think another school would do any good, because anywhere can be a person who reacts allergic in such a way.

It would be a different situation if she had to leave her dog at home or outside the classrooms, but I really think the school is trying.
I wouldn't put it the way deafdyke did, but he has a point. The girl can choose between having lunch with her friends and be without her dog, or to stay with him and eat alone. After all, there IS this other student.
 
Going solely off of what is in the article, I am going to say that the girl needs to grow up and get over it.

The school is being more than accommodating with the dog. She is lucky that they have done as much as they have, honestly. They have worked very hard to make things fair for both students and should be commended for that. But unfortunately they couldn't get around a couple of situations so they did the next best thing they could, and asking her to leave her dog in another room for 30 minutes a day is NOT unreasonable.

The fact is, an allergy to a dog is a health issue, in some cases a matter of life or death. That should ALWAYS take precedence over someone else's convenience and preferences. She managed for most of her life without a dog and there are acceptable alternatives, especially for such a short amount of time each day. Yes, relying on another person or a cane sucks, but it's only temporary and it's the right thing to do to prevent impeding on someone else's health issue. It's not right to expect the allergic student to risk getting sick just because this immature little girl is "embarrassed to be seen with a cane."

Additionally, this girl has an unhealthy obsession or dependency on her dog. I HAD a service dog, I know what the bond is like, but I would have had no problem leaving Daisy in a nearby room for 30 frickin' MINUTES a day for the sake of someone else, especially after the school went to such great lengths to accommodate us elsewhere. Even if I DID have a problem with doing so, I certainly wouldn't have had a panic attack, or done the whole crying, shaking, drama queen bit over it. Give me a break.

In the end, this really has nothing to do with the dog or the job it does for her. Her needs can be sufficiently (even if not conveniently or fashionable) met with a person guide or a cane. It's not unreasonable to ask her to do that for the sake of another student. I bet what this is really about is that she just is throwing a spoiled brat fit because she doesn't want to give up what she has apparently come to see as her PET and not her working dog, or a status symbol, or some other reason like that. The dog is NOT necessary for 30 minutes of lunch, and they are not asking HER to not be with her peers, they are just asking her to leave the dog in another room for a very small amount of time out of the whole day.

She just needs to grow the hell up.
 
I just have one thing to say

Life over Comfort, no one has the right to jeopardize a persons life to avoid using a cane because of embarrassment.

What about putting the allergic student in a different room to eat lunch? After all, that student is the one with the problem requiring a special environment.
 
We're talking about 1) a teenager and 2) an obviously co-dependancy on her guide dog who is probably her only confidant in the world. This girl needs support, encouragement... and love... and not just lip service (only words I could think of at the moment). Compassion and inclusiveness and an willingness to work together for all children, of all cultures, no matter what their challenges. I'm sorry, I shed tears thinking of her being locked away alone for her lunch. There's no "sucking it up" here. Either the school will work to help this girl or it should pay for her to attend a school that can and admit it is unable to.

Just my opinion is all.

She does not have a co-dependancy on her dog. She relies on her dog for assistance. The dog is an accommodation.

But, like a few others have said, there is not enough information to form an opinion one way or the other.
 
going solely off of what is in the article, i am going to say that the girl needs to grow up and get over it.

That should always take precedence over someone else's convenience and preferences. She managed for most of her life without a dog and there are acceptable alternatives, especially for such a short amount of time each day. Yes, relying on another person or a cane sucks, but it's only temporary and it's the right thing to do to prevent impeding on someone else's health issue. It's not right to expect the allergic student to risk getting sick just because this immature little girl is "embarrassed to be seen with a cane."

additionally, this girl has an unhealthy obsession or dependency on her dog.in the end, this really has nothing to do with the dog or the job it does for her. Her needs can be sufficiently (even if not conveniently or fashionable) met with a person guide or a cane. It's not unreasonable to ask her to do that for the sake of another student. I bet what this is really about is that she just is throwing a spoiled brat fit because she doesn't want to give up what she has apparently come to see as her pet and not her working dog, or a status symbol, or some other reason like that. The dog is not necessary for 30 minutes of lunch, and they are not asking her to not be with her peers, they are just asking her to leave the dog in another room for a very small amount of time out of the whole day.

She just needs to grow the hell up.

thank you lily!!!!!!!
 
I agree, there is not as much information as would be required to really take a stand here. I do feel there is a mental illness at hand that needs to be addressed, regardless. It is nothing to shame, but I think the girl needs professional help and it has nothing to do with growing up. Hopefully she can get her help and all can be at peace again and with harmony.
 
Going solely off of what is in the article, I am going to say that the girl needs to grow up and get over it.

The school is being more than accommodating with the dog. She is lucky that they have done as much as they have, honestly. They have worked very hard to make things fair for both students and should be commended for that. But unfortunately they couldn't get around a couple of situations so they did the next best thing they could, and asking her to leave her dog in another room for 30 minutes a day is NOT unreasonable.

The fact is, an allergy to a dog is a health issue, in some cases a matter of life or death. That should ALWAYS take precedence over someone else's convenience and preferences. She managed for most of her life without a dog and there are acceptable alternatives, especially for such a short amount of time each day. Yes, relying on another person or a cane sucks, but it's only temporary and it's the right thing to do to prevent impeding on someone else's health issue. It's not right to expect the allergic student to risk getting sick just because this immature little girl is "embarrassed to be seen with a cane."

Additionally, this girl has an unhealthy obsession or dependency on her dog. I HAD a service dog, I know what the bond is like, but I would have had no problem leaving Daisy in a nearby room for 30 frickin' MINUTES a day for the sake of someone else, especially after the school went to such great lengths to accommodate us elsewhere. Even if I DID have a problem with doing so, I certainly wouldn't have had a panic attack, or done the whole crying, shaking, drama queen bit over it. Give me a break.

In the end, this really has nothing to do with the dog or the job it does for her. Her needs can be sufficiently (even if not conveniently or fashionable) met with a person guide or a cane. It's not unreasonable to ask her to do that for the sake of another student. I bet what this is really about is that she just is throwing a spoiled brat fit because she doesn't want to give up what she has apparently come to see as her PET and not her working dog, or a status symbol, or some other reason like that. The dog is NOT necessary for 30 minutes of lunch, and they are not asking HER to not be with her peers, they are just asking her to leave the dog in another room for a very small amount of time out of the whole day.

She just needs to grow the hell up.

No two people handle things the same way. We do not whole the whole story
there could be others things going at home or at school that was not written about. You can't judge a person from just this story.
 
No two people handle things the same way. We do not whole the whole story
there could be others things going at home or at school that was not written about. You can't judge a person from just this story.

That's why I prefaced my reply with "going solely off of what is in the article". ;) Reading comprehension FTW.
 
I just have one thing to say

Life over Comfort, no one has the right to jeopardize a persons life to avoid using a cane because of embarrassment.

I agree.

I understand that she needs the dog, but we also have to make compromises to meet the needs of others.

Sounds like she would rather that other student die just so that she can bring the dog in the room.

I see nothing wrong with not bringing the dog into the cafeteria just to eat. It's only 30 minutes out of a whole day. The dog can stay in an assigned room during that time.
 
Okay, here's an important question, how does that allergic student deal with the dog being in the same classroom? And why does the lunch room have to be treated differently?
From the article, it sounds like they're in a higher-level school like high school. If that's the case, aren't the classes different for everyone?
 
Back
Top