That's probably something to do with the fact that they would chop anyone's hands off for stealing a loaf of bread.
What's wrong with men!!!!
- Thread starter Phillips
- Start date
That's probably something to do with the fact that they would chop anyone's hands off for stealing a loaf of bread.
If people want to add more legal regulations to the concept of marriage, then maybe marriage shouldn't be recognized by the government at all. The more regulations you add to a marriage, the less sacred it becomes. Like I said, the government has no place meddling in people's marriages.
katz4life
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 0
Thinking of chimps in jeans and it is vaguely erotic.
Yeah, it applies to some women and men who are into beastitly thinking of red carrot dicks are erotic to them.
katz4life
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 0
Right....sounds like chopping some men's head while they are caught licking other mistress's clit.
Try to not resort to using vulgar terms, okay?
MmmmCoffee
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 0
I think they should opt out of government-recognized marriages entirely. They seem to cause more financial burden on couples and families than benefit. Child support laws should never go away... but really... families have changed since the marriage laws were made.
I think marriage is great if it works... but why does it have to be financially bonding and government recognized?
I think marriage is great if it works... but why does it have to be financially bonding and government recognized?
katz4life
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 0
Haven't you heard? South Dakota and Missouri State bans it.
I feel you on this one, BUT there are so many things tied to the legality of marriage, i.e taxes and whole bunch of things govt deems necessary to link marriage with. It's whatever.
Don't look like it's going to happen in South Dakota according to this article.
Federal judge blocks South Dakota abortion law | Reuters
It only seems to affect the late-term abortions in Missouri which is 20 weeks and above.
New Missouri late-term abortion restrictions to become law - KansasCity.com
So... abortions still aren't illegal.
Well, you know, common-law couples are given the same rights as well in a lot of places.
Right. Plus you need to be "officially recognized" in order to be compensated for the death of a spouse. Plus many fool women need the darn respectability of a ring and a marriage license.
katz4life
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 0
Living on tiny island won't charge you a dime and your marriage.
We need more places. But dang, it can get sticky.
katz4life
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah, but you know how the looney pro-lifers are still stubborn trying to fight their win. *lips zipped*
Seems like you've forgotten what you were talking about. Adultery within the marriage is not the same as an abortion. However, it is a personal matter and the government should stay out of it. Most of the times, it's a He Said, She Said situation, so how is the government expected to know who to side with?
Really, it's not worth the effort.
Right. Plus you need to be "officially recognized" in order to be compensated for the death of a spouse. Plus many fool women need the darn respectability of a ring and a marriage license.
For many years its been engraved in young childrens' heads especially little girls that you're suppose to get married. How can you tell anyone different.
I'd like to get married in the future because It's just better to be a wife than a gf of ten twenty years. Although it's something so simple as a piece of paper it means plenty.