I think I did the right thing

compLicaTed

New Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
289
Reaction score
0
excuse me for double checking and editing to make sure that the research i do was legit
 

Hear Again

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
20,114
Reaction score
5
<3 is ascii art for a heart. In internet lingo, <3 refers as a way of saying thanks, or you can use it to say "i heart you" ( <3 you ) or just love someone in general. It can go from jokes to serious.

oic. :ty: in that case, :giggle:
 

SFShawn13

New Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
749
Reaction score
0
excuse me for double checking and editing to make sure that the research i do was legit


Your behavior is very typical of someone who is married to their drug.

I have friends who smoke weed all the time, and they have never claimed the same outrageous facts you have.
 

Hear Again

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
20,114
Reaction score
5
jillio, if i deleted my post in which i said i was confused, would that enable you to regain your ability to feign feminimity? :giggle:
 

compLicaTed

New Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
289
Reaction score
0
Your behavior is very typical of someone who is married to their drug.

I have friends who smoke weed all the time, and they have never claimed the same outrageous facts you have.



actually, i'd say that i'm just a recreational smoker, i dont usually purchase weed, nor do i smoke everyday therefore i'm not "married" to it but then you'd just accuse me of being defensive
 

naisho

Forum Disorders M.D.,Ph.D
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
6,436
Reaction score
10
I would say you have an interesting stand on this compLicated. Your source seems somewhat credible. Though there are some things lacking in it.

I'm not here to harp on your fallacies, but much rather state my opinion in what I think that source should focus on.
Number one, it's based on 1993 data. The automobiles of 1993 =/= 2008-2009, but I know you knew that already. Now I don't know how they evaluated what vehicle would be the consensus there either. The drivers of 1993 =/= the drivers of 2009, especially in california!!

Number two, the article and abstract fails to state the city location or metropolitan area it was conducted in. SF is very metropolitan, it isn't a joke to drive around there. In Oakland sometimes I feel uneasy weaving with the traffic. It isn't like Southern California where I am used to long wide open lanes, people cutting each other off and flipping the bird. We're really hostile when it comes to the world of traffic here, and being a Southern Californian driver of 9 years I would say I feel scared of NorCal traffic. But that's also that I'm not used to it, though that's not the point.

Number three, race should probably play a factor in this. It is a well known stereotype that certain ethnicities are more likely to get induced or toxicated while the same amount for another race would just barely or ever so slightly buzz them.

Just my two cents.

We're really notorious here in California about our driving. I can share you a cool quote, though I forgot who I got it from.
"Southern California, a land built for automobiles and famously hostile to those who commute by other means. "
 

jillio

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,232
Reaction score
18
actually, i'd say that i'm just a recreational smoker, i dont usually purchase weed, nor do i smoke everyday therefore i'm not "married" to it but then you'd just accuse me of being defensive

Oh, you're just one of those freeloaders that smokes everyone else's weed. What little credibility you had just disappeared.:lol:
 

Smithtr

G.G.H.T
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
16,217
Reaction score
15
That is not good weed I hate weed I don't like about to drugs. I hate it. I wish be happy avoid to drugs. i don't want to trouble. i won't be again do no more no way i won't be smoke give you wreck your life on mind worst to bad. It it sometimes hard tell you. Be careful I figure out good choice best to life.
 

compLicaTed

New Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
289
Reaction score
0
Oh, you're just one of those freeloaders that smokes everyone else's weed. What little credibility you had just disappeared.:lol:

you need to read carefully cuz then that could contribute to your ignorance.

i said, quote, 'i dont usually purchase weed' unquote.

note the word USUALLY
not like my world revolves around that
 

jillio

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,232
Reaction score
18
you need to read carefully cuz then that could contribute to your ignorance.

i said, quote, 'i dont usually purchase weed' unquote.

note the word USUALLY
not like my world revolves around that

Then you usually freeload and smoke other people's weed. Same difference.

And,sweetie, I am not the one suffering from ignorance here.
 

compLicaTed

New Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
289
Reaction score
0
I would say you have an interesting stand on this compLicated. Your source seems somewhat credible. Though there are some things lacking in it.

I'm not here to harp on your fallacies, but much rather state my opinion in what I think that source should focus on.
Number one, it's based on 1993 data. The automobiles of 1993 =/= 2008-2009, but I know you knew that already. Now I don't know how they evaluated what vehicle would be the consensus there either. The drivers of 1993 =/= the drivers of 2009, especially in california!!

Number two, the article and abstract fails to state the city location or metropolitan area it was conducted in. SF is very metropolitan, it isn't a joke to drive around there. In Oakland sometimes I feel uneasy weaving with the traffic. It isn't like Southern California where I am used to long wide open lanes, people cutting each other off and flipping the bird. We're really hostile when it comes to the world of traffic here, and being a Southern Californian driver of 9 years I would say I feel scared of NorCal traffic. But that's also that I'm not used to it, though that's not the point.

Number three, race should probably play a factor in this. It is a well known stereotype that certain ethnicities are more likely to get induced or toxicated while the same amount for another race would just barely or ever so slightly buzz them.

Just my two cents.

We're really notorious here in California about our driving. I can share you a cool quote, though I forgot who I got it from.
"Southern California, a land built for automobiles and famously hostile to those who commute by other means. "

noted, considered and appreicated. :) that's all i was trying to ask for-- somebody just to consider the alternative that there could be at LEAST someone out there who does smoke and can handle it without endangering others.
 
Top