Dear Media: Stop Describing the Deaf as 'Mute'

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
An unusual tale about a young Indian woman named Geeta has been making its way around the internet after a Bollywood film helped spark interest in her story. As a child, Geeta accidentally crossed the border into Pakistan all alone. She lived there in the care of a social welfare group for more than ten years years until last month, when she finally returned to India.
2015-11-01-1446419365-156161-Geeta.png

Geeta is deaf and uses sign language to communicate, and the way the mainstream media has chosen to portray her is quite revealing. Major news outlets from CNN to CBS to Al Jazeera all decided to utilize the outdated terms "deaf" and "mute" in their stories about the woman.

For centuries, people with different abilities, intellectual skills or physical features were forced to live on the fringes of society. They were labeled "defective" or "freaks" by the mainstream, and their families were shamed by their existence. These labels kept people isolated, and they opened the door for abuse and neglect. People who were deaf were never even given the opportunity to learn or socialize. They were denied humanity just because they were a little bit different.

Thankfully we have come a long way over the past hundred years and our culture is learning to appreciate the beauty of diversity. When our perspectives on disability began to evolve, so too did the language we use to discuss people who are disabled. While reading news stories about the "deaf, mute girl" in mainstream American outlets, however, I can't help but feel like we've transported a half century backwards in our acceptance of deafness.

The phrase "deaf-mute" is problematic, and it is not an appropriate way to discuss a person. Calling someone "mute" silences them and strips them of their agency -- it sticks a label on them that devalues their autonomy. Mute is a loaded term which carries the distinct connotation that people who are deaf don't have anything to say.
According to the National Association of the Deaf (NAD), a civil rights organization created by and for deaf people:

"Mute... means silent and without voice. This label is technically inaccurate, since deaf and hard of hearing people generally have functioning vocal chords. The challenge lies with the fact that to successfully modulate your voice, you generally need to be able to hear your own voice. Again, because deaf and hard of hearing people use various methods of communication other than or in addition to using their voices, they are not truly mute. True communication occurs when one's message is understood by others, and they can respond in kind."

When photos of Geeta's family were shown to her, she recognized them, and was able to communicate that she knew who they were. Her message was successfully sent and received without words. Although major media outlets decided to call her mute, Geeta was in fact communicating and cooperating with a number of different agencies to find her way home. The ethical and appropriate terminology in this instance would be "non-verbal." If she were unable to use sign language, she would be called "non-verbal, non-signing."

Mute is just one offensive term that regularly pops up in news stories about deafness from supposedly reputable news agencies. The archaic phrase "deaf and dumb" also occasionally makes its way into headline news. It seems obvious why deaf people do not want to be called dumb, yet clueless reporters continue using the term.
NAD explains:

"A relic from the medieval English era, this is the granddaddy of all negative labels pinned on deaf and hard of hearing people. The Greek philosopher, Aristotle, pronounced us 'deaf and dumb,' because he felt that deaf people were incapable of being taught, of learning, and of reasoned thinking. To his way of thinking, if a person could not use his/her voice in the same way as hearing people, then there was no way that this person could develop cognitive abilities."


Hearing-impaired is another commonly seen phrase. When you hear the word "impaired," what do you think? Broken? Incomplete? According to NAD:

"The term 'hearing-impaired' is viewed as negative. The term focuses on what people can't do. It establishes the standard as 'hearing' and anything different as 'impaired,' or substandard, hindered, or damaged. It implies that something is not as it should be and ought to be fixed if possible."

Hearing-impaired is a label created by the hearing community to be more "politically correct" about deafness. Although some deaf/ HoH individuals may choose to call themselves hearing-impaired, particularly those who lose their hearing later in life, it has gone out of favor within the larger deaf community, who (depending on their level of hearing and use of sign language) generally prefer to be called either deaf, Deaf, or hard of hearing.

Had the reporters at the major publications glanced in the AP Stylebook, they would have seen, under the entry for Deaf: "avoid using deaf-mute." If the journalists and editors working for mainstream outlets had any deaf consultants proof reading their articles about deafness, they almost certainly would not be running stories calling deaf people "mute" "dumb" or "impaired."

Use of these damaging terms actually says far more about the perspective of the author and the lack of diversity within the news organization than anything else.

The story of Geeta is framed as a heroic rescue where the "deaf-mute girl" was saved by hearing parties. Geeta is portrayed as an object to be traded across borders, instead of a grown woman capable of feelings and thought. She is dehumanized in these stories to enhance the reputation of her "saviors." She has lived her whole life without hearing or speech, and then the media choose to tell her story in a way that further denies her voice.

Deaf is not a bad word and being deaf isn't a bad thing! All around the world, I see deaf pride bursting out of people who are finally gaining the opportunities they deserve. People who are deaf continue to fight for their rights, struggle for access, and work toward acceptance in mainstream society. Just because hearing people decide to put them on "mute" doesn't mean they have nothing to say.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lydia-l-callis/how-the-media-mutes-deaf-voices_b_8447342.html
 

O

New Member
Yeah, I always give any publishing body the serious side eye when they use outdated terms like that. It tells me a lot about the quality of the research they have done and how connected they are to communities (hint: NOT culturally sensitive and is disconnected from their own people). I don't want none of that.

There is also a reason newspapers and articles are not considered scholarly/peer reviewed via universities and serious scholars. We are encouraged against using this as our reference in our scholarly papers unless we can warn our reader that the source is NOT peer reviewed or scholarly.
 

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
To some deafies the word "mute" does offend them. Same as for "hearing impaired"....Some HOH people get offended if someone says they are "Deaf"....

It was always my understanding that "mute" means non-verbal (Vocal)....and "impaired" to suggest something "doesn't work".....

Bring into the conversation..."Deaf and Dumb" really does get my gander up, tho'!

My boss did call me a "deaf mute" once and I corrected him on the spot!....(I'm an oral deafie)....
 

O

New Member
To some deafies the word "mute" does offend them. Same as for "hearing impaired"....Some HOH people get offended if someone says they are "Deaf"....

It was always my understanding that "mute" means non-verbal (Vocal)....and "impaired" to suggest something "doesn't work".....

Bring into the conversation..."Deaf and Dumb" really does get my gander up, tho'!

My boss did call me a "deaf mute" once and I corrected him on the spot!....(I'm an oral deafie)....
I do consider myself verbal even though I don't do oral. Because I still can communicate with a language (signed, that is). I think it's fine to challenge biases (White/Heterosexual/Socioeconomic status Privilege for example) and that's how we can change as a society.

I love that you think quick on your feet and can speak up for yourself immediately. I wish I had your skill and confidence so I am still working on that!
 

whatdidyousay!

Well-Known Member
I don't want people calling deaf at my condo b/c then people living over my head will think they can drop weights on the their floor and stomp around like a herd of elephants . There was one couple with a small kid and my daughter said the kid sounded like an elephant the way he was jumping off of things. I once saw a doctor and the first thing he said to me was "YOU'RE NOT DEAF!" My rehab case worker told the doctor I was deaf. That Dr. was a jerk .
 

DeafNerdMommy

Well-Known Member
I find it hard when people accuse me of lying about my hearing lose even calling my ha fakes because I can talk fine. When I try to explain I have had speech therapy as a child, they tell that even hoh have a deaf accent. Our voices and accent level is the same as our hearing lose, a little different from person to person.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using AllDeaf App mobile app
 

Bottesini

Old Deaf Ranter
Premium Member
Something new? sign language now "verbal"?
Is this correct for those who utilize "voice off"

No it's not accurate, and it's an unfortunate effect of our society who puts all things hearing above deaf.

It's a visual , gestural language, which should stand equal on its own merits.
 

whatdidyousay!

Well-Known Member
I find it hard when people accuse me of lying about my hearing lose even calling my ha fakes because I can talk fine. When I try to explain I have had speech therapy as a child, they tell that even hoh have a deaf accent. Our voices and accent level is the same as our hearing lose, a little different from person to person.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using AllDeaf App mobile app

LOL! You should had ask the person if their brain was fake! That is one of dumbest thing I heard , wearing fake hearing aids. I was told if I had speech therapy long enough as a child I wouldn't have hoh accent.
That is great you got speech therapy as a child.
 

DeafNerdMommy

Well-Known Member
I wonder if people who are actually mute get offended when they are lumped with deafies that can use their voices lol

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using AllDeaf App mobile app
 

HOH2000

Member
Ugh, I hate whenever people call deaf people mute and dumb. Sooo...ugh, I don't know, annoying. Yeah it's better now than it used to be, but we still need to be advocates for the deaf and HOH. As for me, I don't mind the term hearing impaired though I prefer deaf or HOH I don't find it offensive myself though I see why others are offended by it.
 

DeafNerdMommy

Well-Known Member
I have heard verbal and non verbal, but that also doesn't help in my opinion

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using AllDeaf App mobile app
 
Top