Bill: No snacks for food stamp users

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,433
Reaction score
544
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - Mae Walker uses food stamps to buy what she needs at her neighborhood market.

She likes the freedom of choosing her favorite snacks and is frustrated lawmakers might limit her options.

"Cupcakes, soda, candy -- that's food, so why should they do something like that?" Walker said.

Lawmakers are considering a bill to prevent poorer people from purchasing unhealthy foods with government assistance. As a result, snack foods may be stripped from the list of groceries people on food stamps can buy at the store.

The bill has already passed through a House subcommittee.

Its goal is to promote health and well-being. But store owners who sell the items say it's unfair to control what shoppers can buy.

"By it being unhealthy or healthy, that's up to the people to decide," store manager Tony Khazal said. "I don't think it's up to the government."

In Florida, food stamps are distributed by the Department of Children and Families, which said the program is already designed strictly to help needy families.

"Right now in Duval County, one out of every three children are being helped by food stamps," DCF spokesman John Harrell said. "We're talking about the necessities of life here. If not for this program, then children and families might go hungry."

According to DCF, the number of food stamp recipients has dramatically increased in Duval County over the last five years.

In 2006, just more than 100,000 people were receiving benefits. Now, that number has more than doubled to about 230,000 people.

Proposal aims to ban food stamp users from buying unhealthy food


There have always been restrictions on certain items that are not considered food, such as tobacco, alcohol or vitamins.

Those like Walker say it's unfair to take junk foods off the table, too.

If the bill passes, it's up to the federal government to decide whether or not to allow the state to put the restrictions in place.

Among the items some lawmakers would like to ban are soda, chips and sweets. For example, a cupcake is 180 calories, contains 7 grams of fat, 29 grams of carbohydrates and 240 milligrams of sodium. Its main ingredients are sugar, high fructose corn syrup and chocolate.


Bill: No snacks for food stamp users | News - Home
 
I doon't know about that one. Sounds like a step in the direction to control and regulate sugar. What's the difference in making your own candies, cakes, kool aid drinks, and cookies at home with all the ingredients you can buy at a store?

Here's something I heard over the radio today on a similar subject about a bill in the House to halt welfare payments at strip clubs, casinos, liquor stores and such.

The chamber will again vote Wednesday on a bill which would ensure that electronic withdrawals of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families dollars aren't allowed to be withdrawn from ATMs at strip clubs, casinos or liquor stores. TANF replaced national welfare programs after the welfare reforms of 1996.

House Set to Ban Welfare Payments at Strip Clubs - US News and World Report

In getting free money (at tax payers' expense) to get the necessary subsistence (i.e. food) for their family I'm sure they'd be willing to abide by the rules in order to continue receiving welfare support. If they don't like it then I suppose that'd be an incentive to go out and work instead (for those who are completely able to do so).
 
Maybe it's other countries look at us as greasy and fat people.
 
I doon't know about that one. Sounds like a step in the direction to control and regulate sugar. What's the difference in making your own candies, cakes, kool aid drinks, and cookies at home with all the ingredients you can buy at a store?

Here's something I heard over the radio today on a similar subject about a bill in the House to halt welfare payments at strip clubs, casinos, liquor stores and such.



House Set to Ban Welfare Payments at Strip Clubs - US News and World Report

In getting free money (at tax payers' expense) to get the necessary subsistence (i.e. food) for their family I'm sure they'd be willing to abide by the rules in order to continue receiving welfare support. If they don't like it then I suppose that'd be an incentive to go out and work instead (for those who are completely able to do so).

It's been proven over and over again that those who cook their own meals from scratch are generally lower in weight and have less health problems than those who buy premade foods and snacks.

:dunno:
 
It's been proven over and over again that those who cook their own meals from scratch are generally lower in weight and have less health problems than those who buy premade foods and snacks.

:dunno:

My point was about using sugar at home to make what you want using food stamps. If one cannot buy cookies at a store using food stamps because it is not allowed, nothing can be done to stop them from buying sugar and other ingredients to make their own cookies, cakes, ice cream, drinks, and so on. Not about cooking their own meals. Which led to me to wonder if such items cannot be bought using food stamps because of the sugar content (including fructose) then how long would it be until sugar would be regulated and controlled as the ultimate nannyism.
 
I doubt that will pass because GOP lets you to eat everything what you want.

Ice cream for dinner? sure, no problem.

People are free to eat whatever they like and no need for government to invade us about what we can eat or cannot eat.
 
My point was about using sugar at home to make what you want using food stamps. If one cannot buy cookies at a store using food stamps because it is not allowed, nothing can be done to stop them from buying sugar and other ingredients to make their own cookies, cakes, ice cream, drinks, and so on. Not about cooking their own meals. Which led to me to wonder if such items cannot be bought using food stamps because of the sugar content (including fructose) then how long would it be until sugar would be regulated and controlled as the ultimate nannyism.

contradiction in terms. p.s. food stamps is a form of nannyism anyway.
 
This country needs to make it illegal to purchase junk food. Maybe America`s obesity problem will end, heh?
 
I know Florida is trying to crack down on a lot of these loopholes or issues. I applaud them for that. Too many people are abusing the Food Stamp system to begin with. IT amazes me to see how many sodas, chips, cookies and stuff like that goes by on the belt at WalMart. Just the other day, I was behind 2 families. The first family did real well, they had lean meats, fresh produce, fresh fruits and some canned and frozen stuff as well. They got skim milk, and whole grain bread, Got a full cart load for around $150 all in food stamps and it will feed their family of 4 for 2 weeks the mother said. The next family, had a car load of jugs of koolaid, chips, cookies, ice cream, gum, soda, and a few cans of vegetables and 10 pounds of ground beef and some rice. They spent $140 and claim that what they got will feed their family of 4 for 2 weeks as well. Both these families had mother, father, son and daughter. The kids were each under 10 in both families. Looks kind of sad to me to see what some parents feed their children with funds from the government.
 
It's tricky. Government should not dictate what you can and cannot eat. On the other hand, if the children's health is being compromised by their parents not buying food with actual nutrition, should no one intervene? It's quite a dilemma.
 
It's tricky. Government should not dictate what you can and cannot eat. On the other hand, if the children's health is being compromised by their parents not buying food with actual nutrition, should no one intervene? It's quite a dilemma.

Yeah, I have seen children who are 4 or 5 and they look like the Michigan Man. It's sad.
 
Yeah, I have seen children who are 4 or 5 and they look like the Michigan Man. It's sad.

Yeah. Or their growth is stunted. I've seen that as well. I remember once on a bus, being absolutely shocked by a young mother giving her three month old baby a bottle of coke. her baby's skin was actually greyish in tone. I had my baby with me as well and I couldn't help noticing how pink my baby looked and how grey hers looked. It was really heartbreaking. In such cases, one can't but want to step in and say "hell no, you're not feeding that to your child."
 
Yeah. Or their growth is stunted. I've seen that as well. I remember once on a bus, being absolutely shocked by a young mother giving her three month old baby a bottle of coke. her baby's skin was actually greyish in tone. I had my baby with me as well and I couldn't help noticing how pink my baby looked and how grey hers looked. It was really heartbreaking. In such cases, one can't but want to step in and say "hell no, you're not feeding that to your child."

That's a sign of poor circulation and low oxygenation.
 
Yeah. Or their growth is stunted. I've seen that as well. I remember once on a bus, being absolutely shocked by a young mother giving her three month old baby a bottle of coke. her baby's skin was actually greyish in tone. I had my baby with me as well and I couldn't help noticing how pink my baby looked and how grey hers looked. It was really heartbreaking. In such cases, one can't but want to step in and say "hell no, you're not feeding that to your child."

My mom sees parents of little kids in the inner city giving them Fritos or Doritos for breakfast?!?!?
 
My mom sees parents of little kids in the inner city giving them Fritos or Doritos for breakfast?!?!?

Disgusting. My mother would have never, never let me eat anything like that for breakfast.
 
Support this 100%

You're free to buy all the junk food you want with your own money, but my tax dollars will not contribute to your obesity and poor health, which puts strains on healthcare, which in turn takes more of my tax dollars.
 
Support this 100%

You're free to buy all the junk food you want with your own money, but my tax dollars will not contribute to your obesity and poor health, which puts strains on healthcare, which in turn takes more of my tax dollars.

True, true.
 
Back
Top