WWIII...hmmmmm

Calvin said:
The soldiers were obeying the orders from higher up and brainwashed them. Not all soldiers are evil. Even there is some good Nazis soldiers that saved some Jews from holocaust.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's true. However you compared that to Japanese camp. That's not comparable because those Japanese people who were sent to the camp were innocent civilians.

US was still worse, remember Hiroshima/Nagasaki? Over 250,000 dead civilians.
 
Our government compensated them years later. At the time they were worried about invasion and spying for Japan. That's how they rounded up as a security for the Americans. Pearl Harbor angered Americans and joined WWII.

Japan first refused to surrender... after negotiations they are stubborn. US Government had no choice. The atom bomb was a lesson for them and get them to surrender finally ending WWII. This saving lives of the innocent people as well as soldiers around the world from war if it continues.

CrazyPaul said:
Yeah, that's true. However you compared that to Japanese camp. That's not comparable because those Japanese people who were sent to the camp were innocent civilians.

US was still worse, remember Hiroshima/Nagasaki? Over 250,000 dead civilians.
Click to expand...
 
CrazyPaul said:
Yeah, that's true. However you compared that to Japanese camp. That's not comparable because those Japanese people who were sent to the camp were innocent civilians.

US was still worse, remember Hiroshima/Nagasaki? Over 250,000 dead civilians.
Click to expand...

So are you saying all Muslims are innocent civilians?
You dont know that for a fact, and like I said... the government took it as a precaution. The Japs were treated very well, not like criminals, they just wanted to make sure they werent planted to attack from the inside like the muslims are now doing.... which IS fact.
Yeah, not all are bad people, but times have changed from 1940.
 
sonocativo said:
So are you saying all Muslims are innocent civilians?
You dont know that for a fact, and like I said... the government took it as a precaution. The Japs were treated very well, not like criminals, they just wanted to make sure they werent planted to attack from the inside like the muslims are now doing.... which IS fact.
Yeah, not all are bad people, but times have changed from 1940.
Click to expand...
You FAIL to acknowledge that there were lawsuits and human rights watch involved when cops stopped and frisked any Muslims they suspected after 9/11. Later Homeland Security told law enforcements to back off because it was illegal.
 
sonocativo said:
So are you saying all Muslims are innocent civilians?
You dont know that for a fact, and like I said... the government took it as a precaution. The Japs were treated very well, not like criminals, they just wanted to make sure they werent planted to attack from the inside like the muslims are now doing.... which IS fact.
Yeah, not all are bad people, but times have changed from 1940.
Click to expand...

time has changed indeed... like Gitmo Camp and assassination via drones :Ohno:
 
CrazyPaul said:
You FAIL to acknowledge that there were lawsuits and human rights watch involved when cops stopped and frisked any Muslims they suspected after 9/11. Later Homeland Security told law enforcements to back off because it was illegal.
Click to expand...

But you fail to see the government can do as they please.
 
I don't think rounding up Muslims and making them live in a concentration camp in New Mexico or Arizona is the answer.

Maybe New Zealand?

J/k

I do know there are plenty of Muslims who speak out against the atrocities being done in the name of Islam. But they are very few .... Their voices are weak. It might even be because they live in fear of their brethren.
 
sonocativo said:
But you fail to see the government can do as they please.
Click to expand...
WTF are you saying? Our government can tell law enforcements to enter a home of a Muslim family just because they are Muslim? It doesn't work that way. It's an act of discrimination against religion. This is America. We don't do that anymore due to human rights watch. I suspect that you were involved to burn stores owned by Muslim-Americans after 9/11. Weren't you?











 
Is it ok to bash radical muslims that behead children? Or is that too controversial?
 
Steinhauer said:
Is it ok to bash radical muslims that behead children? Or is that too controversial?
Click to expand...
There are many kinds of Muslims. Kurds, Shiite, blah..... and finally Islam extremists.

For example, KKK is a violent group and they are made up of white people so is it OK to bash white people?
 
CrazyPaul said:
There are many kinds of Muslims. Kurds, Shiite, blah..... and finally Islam extremists.

For example, KKK is a violent group and they are made up of white people so is it OK to bash white people?
Click to expand...

its never stopped anyone before ...
 
Back
Top