Who is the worst child actress?
- Thread starter ravensteve1961
- Start date
Serendipity
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 579
- Reaction score
- 0
Um, shouldn't this thread be fall under the enterainment category?
And no, RavenSteve, Power Rangers is NOT a cartoon.
And no, RavenSteve, Power Rangers is NOT a cartoon.
ravensteve1961
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2004
- Messages
- 3,916
- Reaction score
- 0
Explain this.Serendipity said:
Serendipity
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 579
- Reaction score
- 0
ravensteve1961 said:Explain this.
It looks like it's more of Sex Rangers or something, at least it is to me. Also, you didn't clarify which ONE what you are talking about.
powerrangers are not cartoons. u got the pix above right.
Off point. My son likes Bugs Bunny and Scooby Doo cartoons better (he seems like older cartoons better than current cartoons, he doesn't mind Dora, Oswald or Disney)....I limit his viewing two hrs a day...no more than 2 hrs because I wanna him to play with his toys and go outside in backyard under supervision. Cuz exercises are good for kiddies.
Off point. My son likes Bugs Bunny and Scooby Doo cartoons better (he seems like older cartoons better than current cartoons, he doesn't mind Dora, Oswald or Disney)....I limit his viewing two hrs a day...no more than 2 hrs because I wanna him to play with his toys and go outside in backyard under supervision. Cuz exercises are good for kiddies.
Steel X
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2003
- Messages
- 13,829
- Reaction score
- 55
it's true that the power rangers isn't a cartoon.shezzbeav said:Here is a proper picture of the Power Rangers
Get your bloody facts straight!
the power rangers were first invented in Japan before it went to America around late 1992, and that was when andrew and I watched this show in elementary school. we were crazy about them, but since we grew up, we out grew them, but andrew still loves batman and I still love spider-man ever since.
Malfoyish
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2004
- Messages
- 2,665
- Reaction score
- 1
I don't know who the worst child actors and actresses are - I would have to say the ones who grow up to be drug addicts, booze inhalers, or as Katzie put it so eloquently in another thread, - "nuck futs." LOL. Those are the ones, IMO, that have let stardom get to their heads and are abusing the fame and fortune that they were fortunate enough to acquire as a child. Not all of them do, and those are the ones that I respect.
Everyone has problems. Everyone. Child, adult, teenager, adolescent, geriatric. They've all got an issue, one way or another.
As far as talent - we can't expect a kid to know everything about acting, especially on their first movie. I think Emma Watson is a good enough actress and I do see a lot of improvement on her part in movie 2 and then even more in movie 3. NO one knows where she'll be when the Harry Potter movies are finished filming. Perhaps she'll settle down and focus on schooling, or perhaps she'll continue with her acting and try her luck at different roles. It is entirely up to her. She does have a foot in the door, though. She'll succeed in whatever she chooses to do.
Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is - kids are kids. Acting is something they do for fun, and because they're capable of doing a believeable job. They also get paid for it, which is awesome. They're still kids. Some kids have more skill and talent than others, that's a given. It's when they become adults that we really look at them and say whether they're good actors and actresses. It's when they're adults that we look back at them and say, "aww, wow, look at that, she did pretty good as a kid!"
Look at Ashley and Mary-Kate Olsen. We actually saw them on the small screen when they were just babies. For babies, I'm impressed. Now, though, I'm not entirely impressed with Mary-Kate's drinking issues.
Everyone has problems. Everyone. Child, adult, teenager, adolescent, geriatric. They've all got an issue, one way or another.
As far as talent - we can't expect a kid to know everything about acting, especially on their first movie. I think Emma Watson is a good enough actress and I do see a lot of improvement on her part in movie 2 and then even more in movie 3. NO one knows where she'll be when the Harry Potter movies are finished filming. Perhaps she'll settle down and focus on schooling, or perhaps she'll continue with her acting and try her luck at different roles. It is entirely up to her. She does have a foot in the door, though. She'll succeed in whatever she chooses to do.
Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is - kids are kids. Acting is something they do for fun, and because they're capable of doing a believeable job. They also get paid for it, which is awesome. They're still kids. Some kids have more skill and talent than others, that's a given. It's when they become adults that we really look at them and say whether they're good actors and actresses. It's when they're adults that we look back at them and say, "aww, wow, look at that, she did pretty good as a kid!"
Look at Ashley and Mary-Kate Olsen. We actually saw them on the small screen when they were just babies. For babies, I'm impressed. Now, though, I'm not entirely impressed with Mary-Kate's drinking issues.
Serendipity
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 579
- Reaction score
- 0
Malfoyish said:Look at Ashley and Mary-Kate Olsen. We actually saw them on the small screen when they were just babies. For babies, I'm impressed. Now, though, I'm not entirely impressed with Mary-Kate's drinking issues.
Mary-Kate and Ashley were too adorable to watch at. When I was watching FH as a kid I would notice one of them (when they were about 3) would look at camera or someone off the stage and it was obvious. Anyways, that unique "off-the-stage-eye-contact" eventually disappeared as they were getting older and able to know about acting better. It was learning in process for them and it was normal, but yet looked not too professional.