VP/Spy/FBI

diehardbiker65 said:
You don't understand how the networking system works. All of the Sorenson VP goes straight though Sorenson Server WHILE the rest of VRS don't have any server to deal with point to point VP calls. Only that VRS use server for all of VRS calls only, not point to point like Sorenson system.

I have sorenson VP, and if I want to call you and you got Sorenson VP then my call is really going though Sorenson server first then your VP. See where the problem is? While Dlink using IP address, they search where your IP address and found you, not server of any VRS.
Don't need to do "you don't understand how the networking system works."

the base thing I am saying is that going VRS using Sorenson server cuz they will dail to the request by caller to their relative calls. So-- I am saying that I saw that website of CSDVRS.com that show us how to using the new way. It show a VP-100 but its cover on sticker. So it seem they are using Sorenson's VP include the systeM?
 
Ok, As far as I know that Sorenson got real bad security on their server.
If you wonder why I said "Should I?" on reporting to Sorenson? The real reasion is that they despise on people who are expert with network and refused to hire them and wants to hire people with BS degree, or AAS degree. So, they pay huge money to them and they don't even know how? what a shame!


ideafspy said:
Don't need to do "you don't understand how the networking system works."

the base thing I am saying is that going VRS using Sorenson server cuz they will dail to the request by caller to their relative calls. So-- I am saying that I saw that website of CSDVRS.com that show us how to using the new way. It show a VP-100 but its cover on sticker. So it seem they are using Sorenson's VP include the systeM?
 
diehardbiker65 said:
Ok, As far as I know that Sorenson got real bad security on their server.
If you wonder why I said "Should I?" on reporting to Sorenson? The real reasion is that they despise on people who are expert with network and refused to hire them and wants to hire people with BS degree, or AAS degree. So, they pay huge money to them and they don't even know how? what a shame!

If Sorenson knew its weak spot of crack, would FCC still approve that fund?
 
Next time look who make the sorenson vp-100 and vp-200 and inside will stated made by D-link and you have nothing to worry about. The hardware inside are copy protected.

Doc
 
Good question! I was wondering what these technicans at Sorenson's server are competent even with their BS degree, or really it was a *B(censored)T* degree they were holding? I wish that Sorenson would be smart enough to focus on those who are good with networking like those who may hold N+ certificate.

ideafspy said:
If Sorenson knew its weak spot of crack, would FCC still approve that fund?
 
diehardbiker65,

Interested to learn about sorenson's lack of security, care to give me a url pertaining sorensons' security from NSA or FCC? I need a hard evidence (article or reports) from federal or security sites rather than having to listen to your own side of story to believe anything. From what I've been reading you're siding with Dlink *ALONE* and seem to advertise Dlink to us.

Please do not tell me any more of your "My friend told me", "I'm with agency", "I saw it with my own eyes" or any incontrovertible excuses. Posting a solid url that INDICATES that sorenson's security is failing from any federal, or security sites would be GREATLY appreciated. With these sites, I will be EASILY convienced, otherwise no.
 
Well, I am sorry and this is just a warning. I have witness, and don't believe me?, then go on your own risk! I really don't care because the practice that Sorenson placed on hiring employees is seriously flawed. And I am not supporting Sorenson anyway. BTW, those hackers are hearing people that I know showed me and asked me what they are talking about.

*Since I didn't met Sorenson's requirement of having BS degree, therefore I am not qualified to say technical related information. End of discuss!

LinuxGold said:
diehardbiker65,

Interested to learn about sorenson's lack of security, care to give me a url pertaining sorensons' security from NSA or FCC? I need a hard evidence (article or reports) from federal or security sites rather than having to listen to your own side of story to believe anything. From what I've been reading you're siding with Dlink *ALONE* and seem to advertise Dlink to us.

Please do not tell me any more of your "My friend told me", "I'm with agency", "I saw it with my own eyes" or any incontrovertible excuses. Posting a solid url that INDICATES that sorenson's security is failing from any federal, or security sites would be GREATLY appreciated. With these sites, I will be EASILY convienced, otherwise no.
 
diehardbiker65 said:
Well, I am sorry and this is just a warning. I have witness, and don't believe me?, then go on your own risk! I really don't care because the practice that Sorenson placed on hiring employees is seriously flawed. And I am not supporting Sorenson anyway. BTW, those hackers are hearing people that I know showed me and asked me what they are talking about.

*Since I didn't met Sorenson's requirement of having BS degree, therefore I am not qualified to say technical related information. End of discuss!

DB, When you saw what your friends show you...Are you saying your hearing friends were watching two deaf people chatting on VP from your hearing friends' computer? How did they do that? I'm curious... :dunno:
 
By the way, I'm Computer Network Engineer. You can say "end of discussion" (grammar fix here) and you can warn us all you want, it is our common practice to report and research off security sites like NSA , Security Focus and the like. I've seen similiar arguementation like this in irc.freenode.net and similiar channels and the most common solution is to research off professional sites abeforementioned. I've been around hackers since 1995 and they often depend on these security sites to find more holes, to innovate more hacks and the like. They often seek for fame by having sites mention their nick or hacker's group name on news or something. So far I found nothing with Sorenson' security and you probably are drawing the attention to YOU claiming false things (no such a thing exists unless you provide URL to it). It doesn't matter whether they are hearing or not, GoAmerica.com have deaf vice president (Mark Stern) and what do it have to do anything with being able to hear? Now, UNTIL you provide solid and useful URL to your claims, END OF DISCUSSION. Any further claims made by you will be deleted UNTIL you provide URL to sites that performed review on Sorenson services (because this is not debating thread). If you do provide url to these things, then I will be GREATLY appreciated, believe me, I will thank you a million for it!

diehardbiker65 said:
Well, I am sorry and this is just a warning. I have witness, and don't believe me?, then go on your own risk! I really don't care because the practice that Sorenson placed on hiring employees is seriously flawed. And I am not supporting Sorenson anyway. BTW, those hackers are hearing people that I know showed me and asked me what they are talking about.

*Since I didn't met Sorenson's requirement of having BS degree, therefore I am not qualified to say technical related information. End of discuss!
 
coloravalanche said:
DB, When you saw what your friends show you...Are you saying your hearing friends were watching two deaf people chatting on VP from your hearing friends' computer? How did they do that? I'm curious... :dunno:
Yeah, hacker has the tendency to hold their "Secrets" to themselves to prevent discovery. But Sorenson, FCC, NSA or any security sites has not validated this claim so far.
 
Oh really? go ahead and delete, then your not helping at all. Whats more you forgot something! Dlink do NOT have the server to handle the video relay service like Sorenson have, that is why it is impossible for hacker to break in if it is done by Dlink. PLUS Sorenson DO have relationship with Dlink, and it is not because I am in favor of Dlink, just that it happens that Dlink don't have the server for hacker to break in.

Your right Hacker never leaves trail behind, that is why there is no way they can be traced! I personally have witness with my jaw dropped. But again, there is no way to trace it... Most hackers uses fake proxy server, how can you trace it back?

I am saying is that this is a warning to make sure deafies don't fall victim in scams.

LinuxGold said:
By the way, I'm Computer Network Engineer. You can say "end of discussion" (grammar fix here) and you can warn us all you want, it is our common practice to report and research off security sites like NSA , Security Focus and the like. I've seen similiar arguementation like this in irc.freenode.net and similiar channels and the most common solution is to research off professional sites abeforementioned. I've been around hackers since 1995 and they often depend on these security sites to find more holes, to innovate more hacks and the like. They often seek for fame by having sites mention their nick or hacker's group name on news or something. So far I found nothing with Sorenson' security and you probably are drawing the attention to YOU claiming false things (no such a thing exists unless you provide URL to it). It doesn't matter whether they are hearing or not, GoAmerica.com have deaf vice president (Mark Stern) and what do it have to do anything with being able to hear? Now, UNTIL you provide solid and useful URL to your claims, END OF DISCUSSION. Any further claims made by you will be deleted UNTIL you provide URL to sites that performed review on Sorenson services (because this is not debating thread). If you do provide url to these things, then I will be GREATLY appreciated, believe me, I will thank you a million for it!
 
diehardbiker65 said:
Oh really? go ahead and delete, then your not helping at all. Whats more you forgot something! Dlink do NOT have the server to handle the video relay service like Sorenson have, that is why it is impossible for hacker to break in if it is done by Dlink. PLUS Sorenson DO have relationship with Dlink, and it is not because I am in favor of Dlink, just that it happens that Dlink don't have the server for hacker to break in.

What do network topology (paths) have to do with hacking? Network security is based on how Network Administrator configure their system, REGARDLESS on how things was handled. If you care so much to warn us, then simply provide URL indicating that Sorenson VRS has serious problem OR to warn Sorenson about this activity.

diehardbiker65 said:
Your right Hacker never leaves trail behind, that is why there is no way they can be traced! I personally have witness with my jaw dropped. But again, there is no way to trace it... Most hackers uses fake proxy server, how can you trace it back?

If you personally witnessed it and your jaws dropped to the floor, then report it. Faked proxy server can be hard to backtrack, so the true the same with dlink, it will be hacked eventually. Similiar to Pentagon, it WAS hacked, something that was thought impossible.

diehardbiker65 said:
I am saying is that this is a warning to make sure deafies don't fall victim in scams.

Then provide us the url concerning Sorenson -- something that is VALIDATED or RELIABLE over your own claims.
 
Tinfoil hats for sales! 1 bucks!! pm me your address and will provide you addy for paypal payment then you will get it in your mailbox in 4 weeks!

Tinfoil hats is custom made.. one size fits all! actually really shield everything from your brain!
 
Back
Top