The insurance promise fallout...the making of a lie to look good

[kokonut]

Barack Obama is only halfway through his term, but it's not too early to ask: What is the biggest whopper he has told as president? So far, the hands-down winner is:

"No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people. If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what."

Obama made that particular pledge in a speech to the American Medical Association in June 2009, but he said the same thing, with slight variations, dozens of times during the health care debate. And now, exactly eight months after he signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law, we're seeing just how empty the president's promise was.

The New York Times reports there is a "growing frenzy of mergers" in the health care field in which hospitals and other care providers, pressured by the new law's provisions, are joining forces to save money. "Consumer advocates fear that the health care law could worsen some of the very problems it was meant to solve," the paper reports, "by reducing competition, driving up costs and creating incentives for doctors and hospitals to stint on care, in order to retain their cost-saving bonuses."

The Obama administration's answer to the problem will undoubtedly be more regulation. But the wave of mergers is just one of many signs of trouble with the new law.

For example, we know that the government's Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services has found that the new law will increase health care costs, rather than reduce them, in the coming decade. We know that cuts in Medicare, with the money saved going to pay for expanding coverage to the poor, will jeopardize seniors' access to care. We know the law will make it impossibly expensive for companies that currently offer bare-bones health coverage to low-income employees to keep doing so. We know several corporations are taking giant write-downs because the bill will increase the cost of providing prescription drug coverage to retired employees. And perhaps most important, we know the law offers an enormous incentive for employers who currently provide coverage to workers to stop doing so, sending those workers to buy coverage in government-subsidized health care exchanges.

In sum, what the law means for millions of Americans is: No matter what the president said, if you like the coverage you have now, you can't keep it.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/polit...es-health-care-will-haunt-obama#ixzz169X8LEio

 

[Foxrac]

Just other right wing bullshit.

 

[netrox]

First, the premiums have ALWAYS increased in the past two decades.. where have you been living? Under a rock?

Health premiums up 131% in last 10 years - SFGate

Second, you STILL keep your insurance - the difference though is that insurance companies have to modify their policies to cover what public healthcare does not cover. For example, if the national healthcare will cover the costs of a surgery, there's no point for a private insurance company to cover it because the government will pay for it. That's how it works with Medicare. That's why there are MediGap insurances. If you want better services, you pay more.

Sorry that you don't seem to get it.

This one explains why the premiums are rising (and that's WHY we seriously need regulations on healthcare - it is estimated that 30% of it is unnecessary and abused) and that Americans are getting FAT:

http://www.aetna.com/news/2010/CostDrivers.pdf

Without national healthcare, the private insurance premiums will simply be non-affordable for most people.

There's a lot of abuse going on.