The horrors!

Nothing new here...I can remember when they jumped all over Palin about her clothes.
 
Nothing new here...I can remember when they jumped all over Palin about her clothes.

but.... the difference is..... Palin's clothes weren't paid by herself for herself.
 
but.... the difference is..... Palin's clothes weren't paid by herself for herself.

But they still feel the sting of her critics, 4 years later, almost on a personal level.
 
but.... the difference is..... Palin's clothes weren't paid by herself:shock: for herself.

Nothing new about that. Even you knew back in 2008 when Obama was running that
he had plenty of things for himself that he himself did not pay for.
Please, no double standard.
 
Nothing new about that. Even you knew back in 2008 when Obama was running that
he had plenty of things for himself that he himself did not pay for.
Please, no double standard.

so you're saying it's ok for Palin and Romney too?
 
Is anyone this reckless with money that they have to spend this much on a piece of cloth?

Do they've such a low self esteem that they cannot just go out and buy clothes and create their own identity?
 
Is anyone this reckless with money that they have to spend this much on a piece of cloth?

Do they've such a low self esteem that they cannot just go out and buy clothes and create their own identity?

Oh, you mean people like Obama who got herself a $540 pair of sneakers by designer Lanvin to a D.C. food bank"

Or wear her favorite $2,330 dusty blue Rick Owens leather ves?

Or the $900 dress by designer Chris Benz she wore on an episode of “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition” benefiting homeless veterans?

Or outfitted herself in motorcycle boots, slim black trousers and a ribbon embellished t-shirt from Lanvin wich retails for more than $1,400 at Barneys?

Or the time when she visited a third-grade class in 2009 she wore her navy polka dot Lanvin dress that retailed for $3,643 on luxury online designer retailer, My Theresa?

Or her special order of thigh high boots?

Or what about recently on March 13th when she wore a $2,720 L’Wren Scott cardigan to play tennis at a mini-Olympics event with school children? Heaven forbid should she fall down and scuff up her expensive cardigan

So, maybe, just maybe the press might do better than to feign mock outrage about Romney's wife choice selection of clothes that they buy with their own money. Lucky for Obama, taxpayers get their tabs. Maybe she forgets the magnitude of the recession? Good thing mostly the media ignored her expensive designer clothing apparels.
 
Last edited:
Not by me but, as you well know, it is the apathy of the American voters that allows this system to continue.

since this thread is about Ann Romney... would it be possible to stick with only criticizing Ann Romney rather than always finger-pointing at Obama this, Obama that?
 
since this thread is about Ann Romney... would it be possible to stick with only criticizing Ann Romney rather than always finger-pointing at Obama this, Obama that?

You want to make it about Ann Romney and you are out of luck.
In case you mises the link in the OP, CBS/ABC did mention Mrs. Obama and her choice of clothes. So the way I see the OP, is a cirque about women involved in the presidential election. Of you disagree, fine, but don't even try to make the rules.
 
You want to make it about Ann Romney and you are out of luck.
In case you mises the link in the OP, CBS/ABC did mention Mrs. Obama and her choice of clothes. So the way I see the OP, is a cirque about women involved in the presidential election. Of you disagree, fine, but don't even try to make the rules.

Michelle Obama.... not Barack Obama...

so where's your finger-pointing at Ann Romney?
 
You want to make it about Ann Romney and you are out of luck.
In case you mises the link in the OP, CBS/ABC did mention Mrs. Obama and her choice of clothes. So the way I see the OP, is a cirque about women involved in the presidential election. Of you disagree, fine, but don't even try to make the rules.

Yep.
 
Michelle Obama.... not Barack Obama...
so where's your finger-pointing at Ann Romney?

The finger has already been pointed at Ann by CBS/ABC in the OP.

I'm making sure there is no double standard.

Michelle got plenty of things she herself did not pay for.
Barack got plenty of things he himself did nor pay for.
And, getting ahead of you, M. Romney will certainly get plenty of things he himself did not pay for....even with all his personal wealth.
That is the way the game is played:roll:
 
The finger has already been pointed at Ann by CBS/ABC in the OP.

I'm making sure there is no double standard.

Michelle got plenty of things she herself did not pay for.
Barack got plenty of things he himself did nor pay for.
And, getting ahead of you, M. Romney will certainly get plenty of things he himself did not pay for....even with all his personal wealth.
That is the way the game is played:roll:
feel free to create a new thread about it then.
 
feel free to create a new thread about it then.

Why don't you. You were the one who posted "weren't paid" in #3 post.
Since you are the one who took it off topic, you should be the one to start a new thread
 
Why don't you. You were the one who posted "weren't paid" in #3 post.
Since you are the one who took it off topic, you should be the one to start a new thread

Perhaps you missed Post #2 :lol:
 
Back
Top