Testing for genetic deafness for unborn gets easier....

[kokonut]

Researchers at the University of Washington mapped the DNA of a fetus simply using a blood sample from a pregnant mother and saliva from the father.

This revolutionary technique could become an alternative to procedures like amniocentesis.

.
.
.

While the ability to identify chromosomal abnormalities before birth has its benefits, some warn these types of scientific advances open the door to a host of ethical concerns.

That's because parents could potentially get information on genetic markers that might increase the risk of heart disease or certain types of cancer.

“What about heredity deafness? We can tell you your fetus is going to be born deaf. Some people may say, ‘I don't want a deaf child,’ Other people may say the child's still otherwise a normal child. Where do we draw the line?” said Dr. Robert Klitzman.

“This technology is not ready to go until next year, and as a consequence I think that kind of buys us some time,” said Dr. Shendure.

Read more: WHDH-TV 7NEWS Boston Special Reports - 7 Healthcast - Genetic testing

WHDH-TV 7NEWS Boston Special Reports - 7 Healthcast - Genetic testing

 

[Reba]

I think the question that is more important than whether or not genetic deafness can be tested, is what is the reason behind the testing?

 

[kokonut]

I think the question that is more important than whether or not genetic deafness can be tested, is what is the reason behind the testing?

Well, people for "pro-choice" should be quite happy about this simple genetic testing prospect. But certainly this opens up a Pandora's Box.