Suit: Chase Bank ransacked home of Wash. man on his death bed

yizuman

Active Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,345
Reaction score
2
SEATTLE -- J.D. Butler was on his death bed when JP Morgan Chase invaded his home, according to his daughter, who said the invasion left the waterfront home in shambles.

Celeste Butler says she couldn't get any answers from Chase, so her only option was to sue.

"I'm praying and hoping that this never happens to anyone else again," she said.

Butler says she took home video to document what happened to her father's waterfront home, which was ransacked while he fought for his life in the hospital. Drawers were turned upside down, and a locked china cabinet was broken into.

"They took 17th-century paintings," said Celeste.

Items that had been collected during a lifetime of service in the U.S. Navy were destroyed.

"When I left this house, everything was neat and clean in this room," said Celeste.

Celeste's attorney says Chase, J.D.'s mortgage company, is to blame.

"One of the terms in the mortgage papers is that the bank has the right to enter the property if it appears that the home is abandoned, so we believe that this event was orchestrated by the bank to allow the bank to initiate action against the Butler home," said Chris Davis, Celeste's attorney.

Chase says J.D. had fallen behind in payments. And if a loan is delinquent, Chase says it has the right to enter a house.

"We followed our policy to maintain a mortgaged property, especially during winter months when cold weather can damage property," Chase said.

The contractor Chase hired left orange stickers where the plumbing had been winterized. The mortgage company insists the house was disorganized when it initially checked on it.

But Celeste insists the payments had been made, and the Port Angeles house was neat when she left it.

"And the bank told me the mortgage was current," she said.

Now a court will have to decide who is in the right.

Celeste's father died in January. Her lawsuit claims Chase and its contractors unlawfully entered the house and caused her emotional stress.

"It's shocking because you don't expect a bank with a good reputation like Chase to be involved in this sort of thing," Davis said.

"It's pretty terrible when this happens to you lose a lot of things, so yeah, I'm praying and hoping that this never happens to anyone again," said Celeste.

Butler is now selling the house her father left behind. Her lawsuit, filed in King County, seeks unspecified damages from Chase and two contractors.

Source: Suit: Chase Bank ransacked home of Wash. man on his death bed | KATU.com - Portland News, Sports, Traffic Weather and Breaking News - Portland, Oregon - Portland, Oregon | Local & Regional

Can a bank actually do this????? This sounds alot like the mafia!

Yiz
 
Yes, a bank can do this. Maybe not in the sense in the article above (damaging property), but they can enter a home that appears abandoned. I speak from experience.

I sold my house nearly a year ago, and packed everything and moved out about a week before closing. Unfortunately, in that very last week before closing, the sale fell through. (Buyer's underwriter ended up declining their loan.) And because I'd already moved out, the house sat empty for many months. I eventually moved back to my home. But in that duration with the house being empty, my lender (very same lender as above) came in and winterized the house with antifreeze, and put neon orange stickers everywhere they'd been. I had to de-winterize it all. Now the bank knows I'm back, so nobody has tried to enter since.
 
Agree with AlleyCat on the legal issue. The purpose behind them having access is to protect their investment. You know, check for broken water pipes, structural damage, etc. This case sounds really extreme.
 
It happened to my friend laying off the job. Mortgage people come in and kicked her out of the house.... They won't let her or friend tried rescue her own four horses, and they didn't eat and water for three days! :mad:
 
Agree with AlleyCat on the legal issue. The purpose behind them having access is to protect their investment. You know, check for broken water pipes, structural damage, etc. This case sounds really extreme.

You said it perfect. A lender has to protect their investment. (Just maybe not in an extreme sense! :) )

It happened to my friend laying off the job. Mortgage people come in and kicked her out of the house.... They won't let her or friend tried rescue her own four horses, and they didn't eat and water for three days! :mad:

If a lender "kicked her out of the house", the only reason I can see for that would be that it foreclosed. And, a notice has to be given 6 months before that can happen. It's called a "sheriff's sale" and then there is a 6 month redemption period after. A homeowner is "protected" during this time in case they can redeem their home. So to ultimately get kicked out and locks changed and no access to the horses, etc., the home had to have been foreclosed. (I have a real estate license so I know this stuff. But only in my state, though.)
 
You said it perfect. A lender has to protect their investment. (Just maybe not in an extreme sense! :) )



If a lender "kicked her out of the house", the only reason I can see for that would be that it foreclosed. And, a notice has to be given 6 months before that can happen. It's called a "sheriff's sale" and then there is a 6 month redemption period after. A homeowner is "protected" during this time in case they can redeem their home. So to ultimately get kicked out and locks changed and no access to the horses, etc., the home had to have been foreclosed. (I have a real estate license so I know this stuff. But only in my state, though.)

However common sense would dictate and say "hey animal welfare is involved in this case, lets just allow the owner to come and feed their horses until they can have them moved to another property or can be housed at a horse rescue." This could have easily turned into a nasty case if the horses health deteriorated to the point of no return. I'm glad it was sorted out though. :)

I am also thinking real estate laws vary by state as well. I have no knowledge of real estate laws though, so maybe one could edumucate me?
 
However common sense would dictate and say "hey animal welfare is involved in this case, lets just allow the owner to come and feed their horses until they can have them moved to another property or can be housed at a horse rescue." This could have easily turned into a nasty case if the horses health deteriorated to the point of no return. I'm glad it was sorted out though. :)

I am also thinking real estate laws vary by state as well. I have no knowledge of real estate laws though, so maybe one could edumucate me?

Unfortunately I don't think a lot of lenders know or care. Somebody would have to notify them that animals (those that can't be moved at the drop of a pin like dogs and cats) need care. I'm glad too that it only took 3 days to get those horses fed again. But when it comes to foreclosures, I think the mindset of the lenders is "you screwed us by not paying, we screw you," more or less. Until something gets addressed either by a phone call or in front of a judge.
 
In a Sign of Foreclosure Flaws, Suits Claim Break-Ins by Banks

TRUCKEE, Calif. — When Mimi Ash arrived at her mountain chalet here for a weekend ski trip, she discovered that someone had broken into the home and changed the locks.

When she finally got into the house, it was empty. All of her possessions were gone: furniture, her son’s ski medals, winter clothes and family photos. Also missing was a wooden box, its top inscribed with the words “Together Forever,” that contained the ashes of her late husband, Robert.

The culprit, Ms. Ash soon learned, was not a burglar but her bank. According to a federal lawsuit filed in October by Ms. Ash, Bank of America had wrongfully foreclosed on her house and thrown out her belongings, without alerting Ms. Ash beforehand.

In an era when millions of homes have received foreclosure notices nationwide, lawsuits detailing bank break-ins like the one at Ms. Ash’s house keep surfacing. And in the wake of the scandal involving shoddy, sometimes illegal paperwork that has buffeted the nation’s biggest banks in recent months, critics say these situations reinforce their claims that the foreclosure process is fundamentally flawed.

“Every day, smaller wrongs happen to people trying to save their homes: being charged the wrong amount of money, being wrongly denied a loan modification, being asked to hand over documents four or five times,” said Ira Rheingold, executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates.

Identifying the number of homeowners who were locked out illegally is difficult. But banks and their representatives insist that situations like Ms. Ash’s represent just a tiny percentage of foreclosures.

Many of the incidents that have become public appear to have been caused by confusion over whether a house is abandoned, in which case a bank may have the right to break in and make sure the property is secure.

Some of the cases appear to be mistakes involving homeowners who were up to date on their mortgage — or had paid off their home — but who still became targets of a bank.

In Texas, for example, Bank of America had the locks changed and the electricity shut off last year at Alan Schroit’s second home in Galveston, according to court papers. Mr. Schroit, who had paid off the house, had stored 75 pounds of salmon and halibut in his refrigerator and freezer, caught during a recent Alaskan fishing vacation.

“Lacking power, the freezer’s contents melted, spoiled and reeking melt water spread through the property and leaked through the flooring into joists and lower areas,” the lawsuit says. The case was settled for an undisclosed amount.

More common are cases like Ms. Ash’s, in which a homeowner was behind on payments, perhaps trying to work out a modification, when bank crews changed the locks.

In Florida, contractors working for Chase Bank used a screwdriver to enter Debra Fischer’s house in Punta Gorda and helped themselves to a laptop, an iPod, a cordless drill, six bottles of wine and a frosty beer, left half-empty on the counter, according to assertions in a lawsuit filed in August. Ms. Fisher was facing foreclosure, but Chase had not yet obtained a court order, her lawyer says.

The break-in was discovered when a Canadian couple renting the house returned from the beach.

Chase officials said such behavior by its contractors, if determined to be true, would be considered unacceptable and corrective action would be taken.

Banks and their contractors insist that the number of mistakes is minuscule given the hundreds of thousands of new foreclosure cases filed each month. Bank of America, for instance, says it works with third-party contractors to inspect and maintain more than one million properties each month and has enhanced its controls in the last year to prevent mistakes.

Alan Jaffa, chief executive of Safeguard Properties, which inspects and maintains foreclosed properties for mortgage servicers, acknowledged that a handful of mistakes had been made. In most instances, he said, his company provided a valuable service that protected properties and neighborhoods.

“There is a stigma that we go in, kick the door in and throw grandma out head first and board up the windows,” Mr. Jaffa said. “We are doing a lot of good out there.”

But Alan M. White, a consumer law expert at Valparaiso University in Indiana, says: “Volume is not an excuse for violating someone’s rights.”

A clause in most mortgages allows banks that service the loan to enter a home and secure it if it is in default, meaning if the mortgage payment is 45 to 60 days late, and if the house has been abandoned, authorities said.

Banks do so to protect the property from vandalism or damage for which the bank could be liable.

But determining when a house is abandoned is not always easy and is often left to inexperienced contractors, said Carlin Phillips, a Massachusetts lawyer who represents Ms. Ash, who is 45.

“It’s sometimes as little as someone looking through the windows, or knocking on the door of a neighbor and saying, “Where are they?’ ” Mr. Phillips said.

In Washington, Celeste Butler went to check on her father’s house after he spent months in the hospital and ultimately died.

“The house was ransacked,” Ms. Butler said, adding that it had been neatly maintained beforehand. “They had destroyed furniture, broken into china cabinet. They had looted jewelry.”

In her lawsuit, Ms. Butler is accusing Safeguard, a contractor for JP MorganChase, of breaking into her father’s house. Ms. Butler asserts that Chase failed to properly credit payments made when she switched to an automatic system in June 2009, but that she and the bank worked quickly to rectify the problem.

Officials at Chase said its contractors, dispatched to inspect the house when payments were late, found it in disarray. When no one responded to a letter asking if the property had been abandoned, Chase said, its crews went back in the house to put antifreeze in the pipes.

The clearing out of Ms. Ash’s Truckee home, on Ski Slope Way high above Lake Tahoe, came after several horrific years of personal and professional hardships.

During the California real estate boom, Ms. Ash and her husband, Robert, thrived. Mr. Ash bought the house in Truckee in 2003. Two years later, he was stabbed to death in a road-rage incident near Truckee. (The driver was convicted of second-degree murder and is in prison.)

From there, Ms. Ash’s troubles with the Truckee house became tangled in her worsening financial situation and, she claims, the bungling of the bank, originally Countrywide Financial, which was bought by Bank of America in 2008.

She intended to assume the mortgage on the house, which landed in probate court after her husband’s death. The bank required that she catch up on payments and taxes, so she sent a check for $15,000.

Hearing nothing from the bank for many months and not having ownership of the house, she made no more payments, she said. By the time Countrywide reached Ms. Ash, the real estate market was collapsing, so she sought a loan modification.

Months and years of frustration followed. The bank lost documents and rarely returned her e-mails and phone messages, she said.

When Countrywide issued a default notice in 2007, it went to the wrong address, her lawsuit says. Later, Ms. Ash said, the bank assured her it would not foreclose while she pursued the loan modification.

Even so, the bank conducted a foreclosure sale on the property in May 2008. Again, Ms. Ash said she had not been notified and learned of the sale during a summer visit. She said she had been told the sale would be rescinded.

Near Halloween 2008, work crews broke in and cleaned out the place, taking Persian rugs, china, furniture bought on a trip in Peru, skis, photos of her marriage and childhood in Iran. Her husband’s ashes were taken from the couple’s master bedroom.

A bank spokeswoman, Jumana Bauwens, said, “We take the allegations made by Ms. Ash very seriously and are thoroughly researching her claims. Bank of America will work with Ms. Ash and her counsel to determine the extent and cause of her claims and move toward an appropriate resolution of the case.”

Although the original foreclosure was rescinded, as promised, Ms. Ash, who discovered the break-in in January 2009, says it is hard for her to visit the house anymore and she will probably let it lapse into foreclosure. At this point, she said, it is just a “sad reminder that 22 years of my history vanished.”

“This is in essence a burglary,” said Ms. Ash, walking through the vacant home, with its four levels and commanding mountain views. “But when a burglar goes in, they don’t take your photos and your husband’s ashes.”

“This used to be my haven I’d run away to,” she said. “Now I run away from it.”

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/22/business/22lockout.html?_r=1

This really burns me up. Banks have no right to do this to people like this. This just shows how corporate greed actually works. This kind of crap needs to be stopped and give people a fair shake at working out problems with the banks. Especially within the court system if need be.

Yiz
 
There was a story once where an old lady was boarded up in her own house while she was sleeping and couldn't get out. They found her remains a year later after the winter thaw.
 
While I feel sorry for what happened to the lady, if she had two homes and her financial situation was becoming dire, she should have sold the second home to get it off of her hands.

But I have to agree that banks should be keeping absolute proper paperwork and ensuring contact with all customers to make sure these sorts of mistakes do not happen. The government bailed them out of their stupidity. I think if banks cannot keep proper paperwork then the the bank of Obama needs to clamp down and tell these banks to get it together or go under and fail and be shut down. If they are going to do this, then they need to do it right or face consequences.
 
Back
Top