Science & Philosophy. Religion & Physics. XXIc.
- Thread starter socratus
- Start date
- Status
Epoches and the reference frames.
1
Ptolemee considered, that reference frame connected with the Earth
is absolute.
2.
Copernicus proved, that reference frame connected with the Sun
is absolute.
3.
Then they began to consider, that reference frame connected with
far stars is absolute.
4.
Now it is consider, that reference frame connected with
relict isotropic radiation T = 2,7K is absolute.
5.
But T = 2,7K is not a constant factor.
This relict isotropic radiation continues to extend and decrease
and, hence, approximately over a period of
20 billions years will reach T=0K.
* * *
From the Relativity theory we know, that “time” is a relative concept.
Therefore, dear reader, while you read these lines, the time
compressed up to zero t=0 and T=0K has already come.
1
Ptolemee considered, that reference frame connected with the Earth
is absolute.
2.
Copernicus proved, that reference frame connected with the Sun
is absolute.
3.
Then they began to consider, that reference frame connected with
far stars is absolute.
4.
Now it is consider, that reference frame connected with
relict isotropic radiation T = 2,7K is absolute.
5.
But T = 2,7K is not a constant factor.
This relict isotropic radiation continues to extend and decrease
and, hence, approximately over a period of
20 billions years will reach T=0K.
* * *
From the Relativity theory we know, that “time” is a relative concept.
Therefore, dear reader, while you read these lines, the time
compressed up to zero t=0 and T=0K has already come.
Endymion
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2005
- Messages
- 1,373
- Reaction score
- 0
socratus said:
Time is relative to the observer. It is somewhat plausible that, that time is all of its possible states at once, assuming you have the minimum number of observers required.
On a cartesian plane, let us define a finite number of possible time states (20 billion years) and furthermore define the minimal observation interval to be one year (which is very generous, seeing that we can take time units all the way down to hours, seconds, femtoseconds, and to the smallest quanta of time possible). For time to be in all of its states simultaneously, one must have twenty billion observers, and not only that. Each observer must be in an exact, correct position separate from each and every other observer to experience each interval.
Systems, however, are not orderly. They are not pleasant. There must be far, far more than twenty billion observers in order to occupy each temporal niche in a chaotic system like our universe. Now, what do you define as an observer? Every sentient being in the universe, or every fermion in the universe?
But maybe these electrons are World,
where there are five continents:
the art, knowledge, wars, thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.
/ V. Brusov./
=================================
To see a world in a grain of sand
and a heaven in a wild flower,
hold infinity in the palm of your hand
and eternity in an hour.
/ William Blake /
where there are five continents:
the art, knowledge, wars, thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.
/ V. Brusov./
=================================
To see a world in a grain of sand
and a heaven in a wild flower,
hold infinity in the palm of your hand
and eternity in an hour.
/ William Blake /
Forces of Nature : THE SPIN.
In 1687, the book "Mathematical beginnings of natural philosophy"
by Isaac Newton was printed out. This book has become the fundamental
scientific textbook. In the foreword to this book, Newton has written:
"All the difficulty of physics, as it will be seen, is in recognizing
forces of the nature by the phenomena of motion,
and then to explain other phenomena according to these forces".
"The First Newton's law" breaks on the spot
this well formulated logical thought.
It states:
"Any body, until it remains insulated,
saves its state of rest or rectilinear motion".
This law of motion is considered fundamental in classic physics.
However, it permanently causes critics of initial positions of mechanics.
Because in earthly conditions it is defaulted.
This law does not take into consideration influence of external forces
; it also says nothing about internal forces. The reason on which the body
is moving or rests is not clear. This law is abstract.
Newton perceived illusiveness of this law. His scientific slogan was:
"I do not invent hypotheses".
He said: "I shall not mix conjectures with reliability".
He aimed to build a building of science without hypotheses.
Therefore, he wanted to correct somehow, to change his formulation.
But all attempts were unsuccessful.
However, this law is useful and necessary to explain then accelerated motion.
For this reason, this postulate of Newton
was forced and wrongfully erected to a rank of the law.
And from a school bench the person learns this postulate
as the law (unproved supposition). Here we have the paradoxical situation.
The Bible begins with the unfounded statement
"In the Beginning there was a Word ",
and classic physics begins with the unfounded statement
" In the Beginning there was the First Newton's law ".
The science states that the origin of the World according
to the religious version is not reliable, and builds the scientific
foundations based on abstraction. As a result, both formulations
(religious and scientific) are unsatisfactory from the point of view of logic.
====================================
Newton,s dream was realized by Planck.
let us analyze the discovery of quantum of light by Planck.
M. Planck in 1900 offered to examine the radiation emanating from
absolutely black body (Vacuum radiation of Kirchhoff /Max Laue / ),
as separate portions (quantum).
If the quantum of light will penetrate inside this absolute black body
and will not reflect back, the radiation and heat will die.
That it will not happen, the ideal black body should reflect
(radiate) this quantum of light back. Then and only then,
this initial (natural) radiation of quantum of light is characterized
by the constant of Planck -h .
The quantity of this particle, s impulse is h=1.
Under influence of this impulse the particle moves with speed c=1.
The particle has the form of a circle.
This quantity is described with a formula (h=Et) and has a title of
“the least quantum of action”,“ internal impulse of particle”, “spin”.
================================
Einstein realized Newton,s dream in another way
For the basic point of his argumentations, Einstein
took the constant of Boltzmann R/N = k
and coefficient (b) from the formula of radiation of Wien.
The multiplication of these two quantities gives the formula
of “ internal impulse of particle”, “spin” h = kb.
================================
Quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad one.
Is he really mad?
========================================
No.
Another impulse (spin) in 1925 was found by
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck .
They came to a conclusion, that the particle should have other impulse.
Quantity of this impulse is described with a formula : ћ = h/ 2n,
forcing a particle to rotate around his diameter.
This means that it particle does not move rectilinearly,
but rotates around the diameter (has the form of a sphere).
The rotation of these particle creates electrical waves.
In 1687, the book "Mathematical beginnings of natural philosophy"
by Isaac Newton was printed out. This book has become the fundamental
scientific textbook. In the foreword to this book, Newton has written:
"All the difficulty of physics, as it will be seen, is in recognizing
forces of the nature by the phenomena of motion,
and then to explain other phenomena according to these forces".
"The First Newton's law" breaks on the spot
this well formulated logical thought.
It states:
"Any body, until it remains insulated,
saves its state of rest or rectilinear motion".
This law of motion is considered fundamental in classic physics.
However, it permanently causes critics of initial positions of mechanics.
Because in earthly conditions it is defaulted.
This law does not take into consideration influence of external forces
; it also says nothing about internal forces. The reason on which the body
is moving or rests is not clear. This law is abstract.
Newton perceived illusiveness of this law. His scientific slogan was:
"I do not invent hypotheses".
He said: "I shall not mix conjectures with reliability".
He aimed to build a building of science without hypotheses.
Therefore, he wanted to correct somehow, to change his formulation.
But all attempts were unsuccessful.
However, this law is useful and necessary to explain then accelerated motion.
For this reason, this postulate of Newton
was forced and wrongfully erected to a rank of the law.
And from a school bench the person learns this postulate
as the law (unproved supposition). Here we have the paradoxical situation.
The Bible begins with the unfounded statement
"In the Beginning there was a Word ",
and classic physics begins with the unfounded statement
" In the Beginning there was the First Newton's law ".
The science states that the origin of the World according
to the religious version is not reliable, and builds the scientific
foundations based on abstraction. As a result, both formulations
(religious and scientific) are unsatisfactory from the point of view of logic.
====================================
Newton,s dream was realized by Planck.
let us analyze the discovery of quantum of light by Planck.
M. Planck in 1900 offered to examine the radiation emanating from
absolutely black body (Vacuum radiation of Kirchhoff /Max Laue / ),
as separate portions (quantum).
If the quantum of light will penetrate inside this absolute black body
and will not reflect back, the radiation and heat will die.
That it will not happen, the ideal black body should reflect
(radiate) this quantum of light back. Then and only then,
this initial (natural) radiation of quantum of light is characterized
by the constant of Planck -h .
The quantity of this particle, s impulse is h=1.
Under influence of this impulse the particle moves with speed c=1.
The particle has the form of a circle.
This quantity is described with a formula (h=Et) and has a title of
“the least quantum of action”,“ internal impulse of particle”, “spin”.
================================
Einstein realized Newton,s dream in another way
For the basic point of his argumentations, Einstein
took the constant of Boltzmann R/N = k
and coefficient (b) from the formula of radiation of Wien.
The multiplication of these two quantities gives the formula
of “ internal impulse of particle”, “spin” h = kb.
================================
Quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad one.
Is he really mad?
========================================
No.
Another impulse (spin) in 1925 was found by
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck .
They came to a conclusion, that the particle should have other impulse.
Quantity of this impulse is described with a formula : ћ = h/ 2n,
forcing a particle to rotate around his diameter.
This means that it particle does not move rectilinearly,
but rotates around the diameter (has the form of a sphere).
The rotation of these particle creates electrical waves.
Loved your site, I'am sending it to Freddy who's a neuroscientist and owns the business (or started it) at www.reinodojo.com.
I bookmarked the site to, and just saw "What the Bleep do we know".
I also just heard too, that doctor's are started to tell people that the sun is safe, and eating too many eggs aren't dangerous for you, it's like when 20 years ago, doctor's didn't have a single clue brain cells rejuvenated or it just goes on and on, but it was probably recently too when they discovered or when we knew that the smallest thing inside a cell is light.
And then the mathematic's part of it, well I just have to read more on your site later, but I love it! Tired however at the moment.
Thanks.
I bookmarked the site to, and just saw "What the Bleep do we know".
I also just heard too, that doctor's are started to tell people that the sun is safe, and eating too many eggs aren't dangerous for you, it's like when 20 years ago, doctor's didn't have a single clue brain cells rejuvenated or it just goes on and on, but it was probably recently too when they discovered or when we knew that the smallest thing inside a cell is light.
And then the mathematic's part of it, well I just have to read more on your site later, but I love it! Tired however at the moment.
Thanks.
From ancient times the man aspired to understand the reason
of movement. Gradually in physics there were two points
of view on the reason of movement.
1. In classical physics the reason of movement of bodies
owing to external influence is considered.
2. In quantum physics it was required to enter the term
"an internal impulse of a particle".
It is not me, who has entered into physics representation
about an internal pulse of a particle. T
his term is used in all textbooks and books about physics.
But spelling these words nobody represents this process evidently.
I have simply decided to imagine, as this term,
this impulse looks evidently.
And with the claims I ask you to address to physicists.
They, to be honest before themselves, should decide:
a) or to refuse the term "an internal impulse of a particle".
b) or to accept this term as a reality, and then it is necessary
to understand its origin.
If we refuse a terminology "an internal impulse of a particle",
we shall transform into the people unable to express their ideas.
If we accept this term as a reality, then it is necessary
to reconsider the sights on the world.
of movement. Gradually in physics there were two points
of view on the reason of movement.
1. In classical physics the reason of movement of bodies
owing to external influence is considered.
2. In quantum physics it was required to enter the term
"an internal impulse of a particle".
It is not me, who has entered into physics representation
about an internal pulse of a particle. T
his term is used in all textbooks and books about physics.
But spelling these words nobody represents this process evidently.
I have simply decided to imagine, as this term,
this impulse looks evidently.
And with the claims I ask you to address to physicists.
They, to be honest before themselves, should decide:
a) or to refuse the term "an internal impulse of a particle".
b) or to accept this term as a reality, and then it is necessary
to understand its origin.
If we refuse a terminology "an internal impulse of a particle",
we shall transform into the people unable to express their ideas.
If we accept this term as a reality, then it is necessary
to reconsider the sights on the world.
- Status