Right copy Vp phone for conversation... to Court?

Phillips

Phillips

Lets ride horses!
Premium Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
11,162
Reaction score
1
My friend asked me to leave thread here for your opinions! :):):)


Here

My friend has his Vp Sorenson VRS phone and can make record copy tape from conversation with him or her that about agreement about matters of Money or others.......

If He made to copy a record Tape VCR or DVD from Vp phone .... If there is screwing up and can he brought an evident Vp phone record copy to Court?


Thanks ;)
 
Very interesting about recording VP conversation into VCR or DVD. May I ask how do that do that? Do they have VP100 or VP200?

Btw I'm sure they can bring that copy to court for proof of their conversation involving money situation. I'm sure the court will hire a professional interpreter to interpret the conversation on both sides.

Let me know how's things go. I would like to hear for future just in case. Thanks.
 
I am not a lawyer, but I would guess this falls under the same regulations as phone tapping. If that's the case, then it depends on your state - in some states, you can do this; in other states, you have to inform the other person you're calling and then they can ask you to stop recording.
 
Videophone is treated as Telephone as viewed by FCC, and will be used same way in the court of law.

FYI, generally you need to inform the caller that you have intention to record the conversation. It is up to caller to continue the conversation or not.

Consent means asking for permission.

But if your going to tape by eavesdropping other calls (Tapping), you could risk yourself huge lawsuit liablity, and criminal charges. Don't bother with that, unless you get court approval.

American Legal Guide on Recording Telephone Conversations (USA)

Personally, I won't bother trying to do this annyway. And I am no lawyer or anything to do with legal system, and I just said from my understand, :) The best advise I could give to you is to talk with your attorney and that attorney would give you best answer not us.
 
As a VRS interpreter, I'm not sure how useful the taped conversation would be in court.

First of all, the tape would only show the interpreter signing. There would be no audio. So you would only have HALF of the conversation.

Second of all, there isn't any proof of the identity of the other person. With a recorded telephone conversation, a forensic scientist can use technology to verify the identity of a person whose voice is recorded on tape. With a tape of an interpreter signing, you don't have any way to verify which hearing person the interpreter is signing for.
 
Back
Top